Literature DB >> 26230975

Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.

Yan Bai1, Yusong Lin1, Jie Tian1, Dapeng Shi1, Jingliang Cheng1, E Mark Haacke1, Xiaohua Hong1, Bo Ma1, Jinyuan Zhou1, Meiyun Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitatively compare the potential of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the grading of gliomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Both diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging were performed in 69 patients with pathologically proven gliomas by using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true ADC, pseudo-ADC, and perfusion fraction were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and distributed diffusion coefficient were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis were calculated from diffusion kurtosis images. All values were compared between high-grade and low-grade gliomas by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluations.
RESULTS: ADC, true ADC, perfusion fraction, water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index, distributed diffusion coefficient, and mean diffusivity values were significantly lower in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 109, 56, 129, 6, 206, and 229, respectively; P < .05). Pseudo-ADC and mean kurtosis values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 98 and 8, respectively; P < .05). Both water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.993) and mean kurtosis (AUC = 0.991) had significantly greater AUC values than ADC (AUC = 0.866), mean diffusivity (AUC = 0.722), and fractional anisotropy (AUC = 0.500) in the differentiation of low-grade and high-grade gliomas (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and mean kurtosis values may provide additional information and improve the grading of gliomas compared with conventional diffusion parameters. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26230975      PMCID: PMC4734159          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Derek K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Jens H Jensen; Anita Ramani; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; P Grenier; E Cabanis; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Anita Ramani; Hanzhang Lu; Kyle Kaczynski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Gliomas: histopathologic evaluation of changes in directionality and magnitude of water diffusion at diffusion-tensor MR imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Stadlbauer; Oliver Ganslandt; Rolf Buslei; Thilo Hammen; Stephan Gruber; Ewald Moser; Michael Buchfelder; Erich Salomonowitz; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Do cerebral blood volume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma?

Authors:  S J Mills; T A Patankar; H A Haroon; D Balériaux; R Swindell; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Effects of physiologic challenge on the ADC of intracellular water in the Xenopus oocyte.

Authors:  Jonathan V Sehy; Lin Zhao; Junqian Xu; Heidi J Rayala; Joseph J H Ackerman; Jeffrey J Neil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Clinical relevance of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in assessing intra-axial brain tumors.

Authors:  N Rollin; J Guyotat; N Streichenberger; J Honnorat; V-A Tran Minh; F Cotton
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  67 in total

1.  Mono-exponential, diffusion kurtosis and stretched exponential diffusion MR imaging response to chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ararat Chakhoyan; Davis C Woodworth; Robert J Harris; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Liver fibrosis: stretched exponential model outperforms mono-exponential and bi-exponential models of diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Nieun Seo; Yong Eun Chung; Yung Nyun Park; Eunju Kim; Jinwoo Hwang; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Stretched-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential imaging marker in preoperative grading and assessment of proliferative activity of gliomas.

Authors:  Xiaowei Chen; Jingjing Jiang; Nanxi Shen; Lingyun Zhao; Jiaxuan Zhang; Yuanyuan Qin; Shun Zhang; Li Li; Wenzhen Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Radiomics assessment of bladder cancer grade using texture features from diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Xiaopan Xu; Qiang Tian; Baojuan Li; Yuxia Wu; Zengyue Yang; Zhengrong Liang; Yang Liu; Guangbin Cui; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging as a Tool in Neurotoxicology.

Authors:  Brian Hansen
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.911

6.  Effect of Perfusion on Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Estimates for In Vivo Assessment of Integrated 2016 WHO Glioma Grades : A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Authors:  Johann-Martin Hempel; Jens Schittenhelm; Cornelia Brendle; Benjamin Bender; Georg Bier; Marco Skardelly; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Ulrike Ernemann; Uwe Klose
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) incorporation into an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR model to measure cerebral hypoperfusion induced by hyperventilation challenge in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Aude Pavilla; Giulio Gambarota; Alessandro Arrigo; Mehdi Mejdoubi; Régis Duvauferrier; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained from high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of gliomas at 3T: comparison with standard b value diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Qiang Zeng; Fei Dong; Feina Shi; Chenhan Ling; Biao Jiang; Jianmin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter.

Authors:  Ileana O Jelescu; Matthew D Budde
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2017-11-28

10.  Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Lamiaa El-Serougy; Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Amani Ezzat; Hany Eldawoody; Ahmad El-Morsy
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.