PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of stroke pattern on handrim biomechanics and upper limb electromyography (EMG) in experienced wheelchair users. METHOD: Subjects propelled their own wheelchair on a level, motor-driven treadmill using each of four identified stroke patterns: arcing, double loop (DL), semi-circular (SC) and single loop (SL). Upper limb EMG and measurements taken from an instrumented wheelchair wheel were compared for each pattern. A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05) was used to check for significant differences. RESULTS: The DL and SC patterns produced the best overall results. The DL pattern led to a significantly longer contact angle and significantly less braking moment than the SL and arcing patterns, and a significantly lower cadence than the SL pattern. The SC pattern led to a significantly longer contact angle than the SL pattern and the lowest peak force and impact of any pattern. There were no significant differences in integrated EMG (IEMG); however, the DL and arcing patterns produced lower combined IEMG values. CONCLUSIONS: When traversing level terrain, wheelchair users should push with either the DL or SC patterns. Between the two, the DL pattern required less muscle activity and may be a better choice for experienced wheelchair users.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of stroke pattern on handrim biomechanics and upper limb electromyography (EMG) in experienced wheelchair users. METHOD: Subjects propelled their own wheelchair on a level, motor-driven treadmill using each of four identified stroke patterns: arcing, double loop (DL), semi-circular (SC) and single loop (SL). Upper limb EMG and measurements taken from an instrumented wheelchair wheel were compared for each pattern. A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05) was used to check for significant differences. RESULTS: The DL and SC patterns produced the best overall results. The DL pattern led to a significantly longer contact angle and significantly less braking moment than the SL and arcing patterns, and a significantly lower cadence than the SL pattern. The SC pattern led to a significantly longer contact angle than the SL pattern and the lowest peak force and impact of any pattern. There were no significant differences in integrated EMG (IEMG); however, the DL and arcing patterns produced lower combined IEMG values. CONCLUSIONS: When traversing level terrain, wheelchair users should push with either the DL or SC patterns. Between the two, the DL pattern required less muscle activity and may be a better choice for experienced wheelchair users.
Authors: Shelby L Walford; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Yaejin Moon; Ian M Rice; Elizabeth T Hsiao Wecksler; Carolyn L Beck; Jacob J Sosnoff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Saulo Fernandes Melo Oliveira; Afonso Augusto Guimarães Bione; Lúcia Inês Guedes Leite Oliveira; Adalberto Veronese da Costa; Fernando José de Sá Pereira Guimarães; Manoel da Cunha Costa Journal: Sports Med Int Open Date: 2017-07-05
Authors: Emma Fortune; Beth A Cloud-Biebl; Stefan I Madansingh; Che G Ngufor; Meegan G Van Straaten; Brianna M Goodwin; Dennis H Murphree; Kristin D Zhao; Melissa M Morrow Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 2.368