BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to assess the current state of quality and outcomes measures being reported for hepatic resections in the recent literature. METHODS: Medline and PubMed databases were searched for English language articles published between 1 January 2002 and 30 April 2013. Two examiners reviewed each article and relevant citations for appropriateness of inclusion, which excluded papers of liver donor hepatic resections, repeat hepatectomies or meta-analyses. Data were extracted and summarized by two examiners for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies were identified with suitable reporting to assess peri-operative mortality in hepatic resections. In only 35% (19/55) of the studies was the follow-up time explicitly stated, and in 47% (26/55) of studies peri-operative mortality was limited to in-hospital or 30 days. The time period in which complications were captured was not explicitly stated in 19 out of 28 studies. The remaining studies only captured complications within 30 days of the index operation (8/28). There was a paucity of quality literature addressing truly patient-centred outcomes. CONCLUSION: Quality outcomes after a hepatic resection are inconsistently reported in the literature. Quality outcome studies for a hepatectomy should report mortality and morbidity at a minimum of 90 days after surgery.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to assess the current state of quality and outcomes measures being reported for hepatic resections in the recent literature. METHODS: Medline and PubMed databases were searched for English language articles published between 1 January 2002 and 30 April 2013. Two examiners reviewed each article and relevant citations for appropriateness of inclusion, which excluded papers of liver donor hepatic resections, repeat hepatectomies or meta-analyses. Data were extracted and summarized by two examiners for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies were identified with suitable reporting to assess peri-operative mortality in hepatic resections. In only 35% (19/55) of the studies was the follow-up time explicitly stated, and in 47% (26/55) of studies peri-operative mortality was limited to in-hospital or 30 days. The time period in which complications were captured was not explicitly stated in 19 out of 28 studies. The remaining studies only captured complications within 30 days of the index operation (8/28). There was a paucity of quality literature addressing truly patient-centred outcomes. CONCLUSION: Quality outcomes after a hepatic resection are inconsistently reported in the literature. Quality outcome studies for a hepatectomy should report mortality and morbidity at a minimum of 90 days after surgery.
Authors: Hideki Nishio; Ernest Hidalgo; Zaed Z R Hamady; Kadiyala V Ravindra; Anil Kotru; Dowmitra Dasgupta; Ahmed Al-Mukhtar; K Rajendra Prasad; Giles J Toogood; J Peter A Lodge Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Nuh N Rahbari; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Mark Brooke-Smith; Michael Crawford; Rene Adam; Moritz Koch; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ronald P Dematteo; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Sheung Tat Fan; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Lorenzo Capussotti; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Jennifer E Heckman; Andrew D Shore; Hari Nathan; Alexander A Parikh; John F P Bridges; Robert A Anders; Daniel A Anaya; Natasha S Becker; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Ryan S Turley; Srinevas K Reddy; Cynthia K Shortell; Bryan M Clary; John E Scarborough Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-06-30 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Rebecca A Schroeder; Carlos E Marroquin; Barbara Phillips Bute; Shukri Khuri; William G Henderson; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Michael A Choti; Martin A Makary; Joseph M Herman; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Thomas A Aloia; Bridget N Fahy; Craig P Fischer; Stephen L Jones; Andrea Duchini; Joseph Galati; A Osama Gaber; R Mark Ghobrial; Barbara L Bass Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Yoji Kishi; Eddie K Abdalla; Yun Shin Chun; Daria Zorzi; David C Madoff; Michael J Wallace; Steven A Curley; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bolanle Asiyanbola; David Chang; Ana Luiza Gleisner; Hari Nathan; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kim M C van Mierlo; Toine M Lodewick; Dipok K Dhar; Victor van Woerden; Ralph Kurstjens; Frank G Schaap; Ronald M van Dam; Soumil Vyas; Massimo Malagó; Cornelis H C Dejong; Steven W M Olde Damink Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Allison N Martin; Matthew J Kerwin; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; George J Stukenborg; Victor M Zaydfudim Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Julie N Leal; Eran Sadot; Mithat Gonen; Stuart Lichtman; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Travis A Shutt; Prejesh Philips; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.452