Literature DB >> 27506991

Validation of the peak bilirubin criterion for outcome after partial hepatectomy.

Kim M C van Mierlo1, Toine M Lodewick2, Dipok K Dhar3, Victor van Woerden1, Ralph Kurstjens1, Frank G Schaap1, Ronald M van Dam1, Soumil Vyas4, Massimo Malagó4, Cornelis H C Dejong5, Steven W M Olde Damink6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative liver failure (PLF) is a dreaded complication after partial hepatectomy. The peak bilirubin criterion (>7.0 mg/dL or ≥120 μmol/L) is used to define PLF. This study aimed to validate the peak bilirubin criterion as postoperative risk indicator for 90-day liver-related mortality.
METHODS: Characteristics of 956 consecutive patients who underwent partial hepatectomy at the Maastricht University Medical Centre or Royal Free London between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed by uni- and multivariable analyses with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (3.7%) met the postoperative peak bilirubin criterion at median day 19 with a median bilirubin level of 183 [121-588] μmol/L. Sensitivity and specificity for liver-related mortality after major hepatectomy were 41.2% and 94.6%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 22.6%. Predictors of liver-related mortality were the peak bilirubin criterion (p < 0.001, OR = 15.9 [95%CI 5.2-48.7]), moderate-severe steatosis and fibrosis (p = 0.013, OR = 8.5 [95%CI 1.6-46.6]), ASA 3-4 (p = 0.047, OR = 3.0 [95%CI 1.0-8.8]) and age (p = 0.044, OR = 1.1 [95%CI 1.0-1.1]).
CONCLUSION: The peak bilirubin criterion has a low sensitivity and positive predictive value for 90-day liver-related mortality after major hepatectomy.
Copyright © 2016 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506991      PMCID: PMC5061023          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  35 in total

1.  Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation.

Authors:  C Couinaud
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  The predictive value of postoperative clinical risk scores for outcome after hepatic resection: a validation analysis in 807 patients.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Christoph Reissfelder; Moritz Koch; Heike Elbers; Fabian Striebel; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Split decision.

Authors:  U P Neumann; C H C Dejong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS).

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Mark Brooke-Smith; Michael Crawford; Rene Adam; Moritz Koch; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ronald P Dematteo; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Sheung Tat Fan; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Lorenzo Capussotti; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Identification of fibroblast growth factor 15 as a novel mediator of liver regeneration and its application in the prevention of post-resection liver failure in mice.

Authors:  Iker Uriarte; Maite G Fernandez-Barrena; Maria J Monte; Maria U Latasa; Haisul C Y Chang; Simone Carotti; Umberto Vespasiani-Gentilucci; Sergio Morini; Eva Vicente; Axel R Concepcion; Juan F Medina; José Juan G Marin; Carmen Berasain; Jesus Prieto; Matías A Avila
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Consequences of chemotherapy on resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  P Pessaux; M-P Chenard; P Bachellier; D Jaeck
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.043

7.  Novel three-dimensional imaging technique improves the accuracy of hepatic volumetric assessment.

Authors:  Bernard J DuBray; Rebecca V Levy; Parvathi Balachandran; Kendra D Conzen; Gundumi A Upadhya; Christopher D Anderson; William C Chapman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Predictive indices of morbidity and mortality after liver resection.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schroeder; Carlos E Marroquin; Barbara Phillips Bute; Shukri Khuri; William G Henderson; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Liver failure after partial hepatic resection: definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  Maartje A J van den Broek; Steven W M Olde Damink; Cornelis H C Dejong; Hauke Lang; Massimo Malagó; Rajiv Jalan; Fuat H Saner
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.828

10.  Bile acid-induced liver toxicity: relation to the hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance of bile acids.

Authors:  A F Attili; M Angelico; A Cantafora; D Alvaro; L Capocaccia
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.538

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging predicts individual future liver performance after liver resection for cancer.

Authors:  Damian J Mole; Jonathan A Fallowfield; Ahmed E Sherif; Timothy Kendall; Scott Semple; Matt Kelly; Gerard Ridgway; John J Connell; John McGonigle; Rajarshi Banerjee; J Michael Brady; Xiaozhong Zheng; Michael Hughes; Lucile Neyton; Joanne McClintock; Garry Tucker; Hilary Nailon; Dilip Patel; Anthony Wackett; Michelle Steven; Fenella Welsh; Myrddin Rees
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.