Literature DB >> 27272270

Central Hepatectomy versus Extended Hepatectomy for Malignant Tumors: A Propensity Score Analysis of Postoperative Complications.

Nicola de'Angelis1, Gérard Pascal1, Chady Salloum1, Eylon Lahat1, Philippe Ichai2,3, Faouzi Saliba1,4, René Adam4,2, Denis Castaing2,3, Daniel Azoulay5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The specific definition of central hepatectomy (CH) (i.e., resection of segments 4-5-8 ± 1) is not uniformly used, resulting in conflicting comparisons with the more commonly performed extended hepatectomy (EH). The study aimed to compare, using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, the incidence of postoperative complications between CH and EH for centrally located liver tumors (CLLT).
METHODS: All consecutive CH and EH procedures for CLLT performed from 1980 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Independent predictors of postoperative complications were identified. CH was compared to EH after PSM.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 373 patients, 44 (11.8 %) of whom underwent CH and 329 (88.2 %) of whom underwent EH. Before PSM, the overall 90-day mortality was 7.2 % (27 patients) without a group difference (2 (4.5 %) for CH vs. 25 (7.6 %) for EH, p = 0.756). The CH and EH groups had similar postoperative morbidity rates (43.2 vs. 55.3 %; p = 0.108). Blood transfusion was the only independent predictor of postoperative complications (Hazard Ratio: 1.73; 95 % confidence interval: 1.11-2.68; p = 0.014). After PSM, 43 CH patients were matched with 43 EH patients. No group difference was observed for the postoperative mortality, morbidity, or duration of hospital stay. A higher number of EH patients (30.2 vs. 9.3 %, p = 0.028) presented with more than one postoperative complication.
CONCLUSIONS: CH and EH yield similar mortality and morbidity. For CLLT, CH may be an attractive procedure with the advantage of sparing the liver parenchyma compared with EH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272270     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3584-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  45 in total

1.  Mesohepatectomy.

Authors:  C H Scudamore; A K Buczkowski; H Shayan; S G Ho; G M Legiehn; S W Chung; D A Owen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Fusion of Information from 3D Printing and Surgical Robot: An Innovative Minimally Technique Illustrated by the Resection of a Large Celiac Trunk Aneurysm.

Authors:  Chady Salloum; Chetana Lim; Liliana Fuentes; Michael Osseis; Alain Luciani; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center study with propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Rony Eshkenazy; Francesco Brunetti; Roberto Valente; Mara Costa; Mara Disabato; Chady Salloum; Philippe Compagnon; Alexis Laurent; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  In situ hypothermic perfusion of the liver versus standard total vascular exclusion for complex liver resection.

Authors:  Daniel Azoulay; Rony Eshkenazy; Paola Andreani; Denis Castaing; René Adam; Philippe Ichai; Salima Naili; Eric Vinet; Faouzi Saliba; Antoinette Lemoine; Marie-Christine Gillon; Henri Bismuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Peter Jüni
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Treatment of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma with central hepatectomy.

Authors:  Rey-Heng Hu; Po-Huang Lee; Yue-Cune Chang; Ming-Chih Ho; Sen-Chang Yu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Tumor progression after preoperative portal vein embolization.

Authors:  Lisette T Hoekstra; Krijn P van Lienden; Ageeth Doets; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Liver failure after partial hepatic resection: definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  Maartje A J van den Broek; Steven W M Olde Damink; Cornelis H C Dejong; Hauke Lang; Massimo Malagó; Rajiv Jalan; Fuat H Saner
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.828

10.  Kidney failure following liver resection.

Authors:  F Saner
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  2 in total

1.  The use of robot-assisted surgery for visceral abdominal aneurysms treatment.

Authors:  Valentina Pucci; Roberto D'Ischia; Lorenzo Maria Fatucchi; Michele Marconi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma: a multicenter propensity score adjustment analysis by the AFC-HCA-2013 study group.

Authors:  Filippo Landi; Nicola De' Angelis; Olivier Scatton; Xavier Vidal; Ahmet Ayav; Fabrice Muscari; Safi Dokmak; Guido Torzilli; Nicolas Demartines; Olivier Soubrane; Daniel Cherqui; Jean Hardwigsen; Alexis Laurent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.