Literature DB >> 26225451

Influence of Cardiac MR Imaging on DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Human Blood Lymphocytes.

Michael Brand1, Stephan Ellmann1, Matthias Sommer1, Matthias S May1, Achim Eller1, Wolfgang Wuest1, Christina Engert1, Stephan Achenbach1, Michael A Kuefner1, Tobias Baeuerle1, Michael Lell1, Michael Uder1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in patients who underwent cardiac MR imaging in daily routine by using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was performed according to local ethics committee approval. Informed patient consent was obtained. Blood samples from 45 patients (13 women, 32 men; mean age, 50.3 years [age range, 20-89 years]) were obtained before and after contrast agent-enhanced cardiac MR imaging. MR imaging-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) were quantified in isolated blood lymphocytes by using immunofluorescence microscopy after staining the phosphorylated histone variant γ-H2AX. Twenty-nine patients were examined with a myocarditis protocol (group A), 10 patients with a stress-testing protocol (group B), and six patients with flow measurements and angiography (group C). Paired t test was performed to compare excess foci before and after MR imaging.
RESULTS: The mean baseline DSB level before MR imaging and 5 minutes after MR imaging was, respectively, 0.116 DSB per cell ± 0.019 (standard deviation) and 0.117 DSB per cell ± 0.019 (P = .71). There was also no significant difference in DSBs in these subgroups (group A: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.114 and 0.114, P = .91; group B: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.123 and 0.124, P = .78; group C: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.114 and 0.115, P = .36).
CONCLUSION: By using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy, no DNA DSBs were detected after cardiac MR imaging. © RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225451     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Cardiac MR Imaging and the Specter of Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Ruth A Kleinerman; Dorothea McAreavey; Preetha Rajaraman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Absence of DNA double-strand breaks in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging assessed by γH2AX flow cytometry.

Authors:  Martin Fasshauer; Thomas Krüwel; Antonia Zapf; Vera C Stahnke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Wieland Staab; Jan M Sohns; Michael Steinmetz; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Andreas Schuster; Christian Ritter; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Moderate Dose Irradiation Induces DNA Damage and Impairments of Barrier and Host Defense in Nasal Epithelial Cells in vitro.

Authors:  Yue-Ying Yang; Jing Liu; Yi-Tong Liu; Hsiao-Hui Ong; Qian-Min Chen; Ce-Belle Chen; Mark Thong; Xinni Xu; Sui-Zi Zhou; Qian-Hui Qiu; De-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 4.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes induced by two-day 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Lisa Hartmann; Dominik Geisel; Felicitas Richter; Winfried Brenner; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The effect of 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance on human circulating leucocytes.

Authors:  William R Critchley; Anna Reid; Julie Morris; Josephine H Naish; John P Stone; Alexandra L Ball; Triin Major; David Clark; Nick Waldron; Christien Fortune; Jakub Lagan; Gavin A Lewis; Mark Ainslie; Erik B Schelbert; Daniel M Davis; Matthias Schmitt; James E Fildes; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Comments on potential health effects of MRI-induced DNA lesions: quality is more important to consider than quantity.

Authors:  M A Hill; P O'Neill; W G McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR exams of human subjects are associated with significant increases in the DNA repair marker 53BP1, but not the damage marker γH2AX.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Jacob B Ekins; Anthony S Tin; Sylvain Costes; Tamara M Hudson; Dana J Schroeder; Kevin Kallmes; Scott H Kaufmann; Philip M Young; Aiming Lu; Ramanathan Kadirvel; David F Kallmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Effect of Contrast Enhanced Abdominopelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Expression and Methylation Level of ATM and AKT Genes.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Jalali; Hossein Mozdarani; Hossein Ghanaati
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.