Literature DB >> 29165554

The effect of 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance on human circulating leucocytes.

William R Critchley1,2, Anna Reid3,4, Julie Morris5, Josephine H Naish4, John P Stone1,2, Alexandra L Ball1,2, Triin Major1,2, David Clark6, Nick Waldron3, Christien Fortune4, Jakub Lagan3,4, Gavin A Lewis3,4, Mark Ainslie3, Erik B Schelbert7,8, Daniel M Davis1, Matthias Schmitt3, James E Fildes1,2, Christopher A Miller3,4,9.   

Abstract

Aims: Investigators have proposed that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) should have restrictions similar to those of ionizing imaging techniques. We aimed to investigate the acute effect of 1.5 T CMR on leucocyte DNA integrity, cell counts, and function in vitro, and in a large cohort of patients in vivo. Methods and results: In vitro study: peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from healthy volunteers, and histone H2AX phosphorylation (γ-H2AX) expression, leucocyte counts, and functional parameters were quantified using flow cytometry under the following conditions: (i) immediately following PBMC isolation, (ii) after standing on the benchside as a temperature and time control, (iii) after a standard CMR scan. In vivo study: blood samples were taken from 64 consecutive consenting patients immediately before and after a standard clinical scan. Samples were analysed for γ-H2AX expression and leucocyte counts. CMR was not associated with a significant change in γ-H2AX expression in vitro or in vivo, although there were significant inter-patient variations. In vitro cell integrity and function did not change with CMR. There was a significant reduction in circulating T cells in vivo following CMR.
Conclusion: 1.5 T CMR was not associated with DNA damage in vitro or in vivo. Histone H2AX phosphorylation expression varied markedly between individuals; therefore, small studies using γ-H2AX as a marker of DNA damage should be interpreted with caution. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was not associated with loss of leucocyte viability or function in vitro. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was associated with a statistically significant reduction in viable leucocytes in vivo. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; DNA ; Double-strand breaks; Leucocytes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29165554      PMCID: PMC5837583          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  26 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental causes of variation in basal levels of blood cells.

Authors:  D M Evans; I H Frazer; N G Martin
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2002

3.  Exposure to acute hypoxia induces a transient DNA damage response which includes Chk1 and TLK1.

Authors:  Isabel M Pires; Zuzana Bencokova; Chris McGurk; Ester M Hammond
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging causing DNA damage?

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Antti Saraste; Marko Kallio; Heikki Minn
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  DNA damage foci: Meaning and significance.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Stephen Barnard; Jayne Moquet; Michele Ellender; Zohaib Rana; Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Biological Effects of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance on Human Blood Cells.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Alain Nchimi; Céline Delierneux; Alexandre Hego; Christian Gosset; André Gothot; Luaba Jean-Flory Tshibanda; Cécile Oury
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  Bioeffects of static magnetic fields: oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies.

Authors:  Soumaya Ghodbane; Aida Lahbib; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Comments on potential health effects of MRI-induced DNA lesions: quality is more important to consider than quantity.

Authors:  M A Hill; P O'Neill; W G McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Brandon J Baird; Christophe E Redon; Valeriya Avdoshina; Guillermo Palchik; Junfang Wu; Alexei Kondratyev; William M Bonner; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DNA-PK triggers histone ubiquitination and signaling in response to DNA double-strand breaks produced during the repair of transcription-blocking topoisomerase I lesions.

Authors:  Agnese Cristini; Joon-Hyung Park; Giovanni Capranico; Gaëlle Legube; Gilles Favre; Olivier Sordet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Cardiac MR imaging genotoxicity?

Authors:  Mark A Hill
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role.

Authors:  Francesca Baessato; Marco Guglielmo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Stefano Scafuri; Mario Babbaro; Rocco Mollace; Ada Collevecchio; Andrea I Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.