| Literature DB >> 28871484 |
Agnieszka Boś-Liedke1,2, Magdalena Walawender3, Anna Woźniak3, Dorota Flak3, Jacek Gapiński3,4, Stefan Jurga3,4, Małgorzata Kucińska5, Adam Plewiński5, Marek Murias5, Marwa Elewa6, Lisa Lampp7, Peter Imming7, Krzysztof Tadyszak8,9.
Abstract
Oxygenation is one of the most important physiological parameters of biological systems. LowEntities:
Keywords: Cytotoxicity; EPR oximetry; Oxygenation sensor; TAM derivative
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28871484 PMCID: PMC5913390 DOI: 10.1007/s12013-017-0824-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biochem Biophys ISSN: 1085-9195 Impact factor: 2.194
Fig. 1Molecular structure of PTMTC optimized in Gaussian visualized in GaussView (gray C, green Cl, red O, and white H) [30]. Inset shows radial distance through space from the center C atom with sources of isotropic shfs (color figure online)
Fig. 2a EPR signal of PTMTC in PBS solution pH 7.4 (~18.5% O2) inset: b free induction decay (T 2* = (21 ± 1) ns); c T 1 = (63 ± 7) ns (from FID—saturation); d powder EPR line and simulation
Isotropic hyper- and super hyperfine coupling constants (ν = 1.09 GHz, 18.5% O2)
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B [G] | 382.63 | 383.95 | 388.00 | 388.46 | 389.60 | 390.78 | 391.29 | 394.61 | 395.76 |
| ΔB [G] | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| A [a. u.] | 0.016 | 0.030 | 0.0022 | 0.0075 | 1 | 0.0075 | 0.0022 | 0.030 | 0.016 |
| I [a. u.] | 0.0034 | 0.0063 | 97 × 10−6 | 0.00036 | 0.22 | 0.00036 | 97 × 10−6 | 0.0063 | 0.0034 |
| a1 [G] | 2.32 | ||||||||
| a2 [G] | 3.29 | ||||||||
| a3 [G] | 10.66 | ||||||||
| a4 [G] | 13.08 | ||||||||
No. is the number of line in the Fig. 2, B is the field where the signal appears, ΔB is the peak–peak linewidth, A is the amplitude, I is the intensity from equation [31], ai is the isotropic Fermi coupling constants. For the assignment of couplings No. 1–9 to 13C atoms in PTMTC, see [32]
Fig. 3Central line broadening of the main EPR line component; (inset) linewidth vs. saturation with oxygen in PBS pH 7.4
Stability of the radical in different solutions
| Time | 0 (h) | 24 | 48 | 72 | 93.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent | % | % | % | % | % | |
| 1 | PBS buffer pH = 7.4 | 100 | 99 | 99 | 98 | 97 |
|
| EMEM FBS 10% P/S 1% (0.75 mL) + PBS (0.25 mL) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 94 | 94 |
| 3 | McCoy’s FBS 10% P/S 1% (0.75 mL) + PBS (0.25 mL) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 94 | 94 |
| 4 | Rat blood + heparin (0.75 mL) + PBS (0.25 mL) | 100 | 64 | 34 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 5 | Blood plasma + heparin (0.75 mL) + PBS (0.25 mL) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Fig. 4UV–Vis spectra of fresh and month old samples held under natural light conditions
Fig. 5a Fluorescence vs. multiple excitation wavelengths; b The strongest fluorescence for the excitation at 410 nm (black) and PBS fluorescence (blue); inset shows fluorescence of PBS pH 7.4 buffer in larger scale; c Count in maximum absorption ~632 nm vs. excitation wavelength, inset shows proposed Jablonski diagram for this system (not in scale) (color figure online)
Fig. 6Viability of HT-29 (a) and FaDu (b) cell lines after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation with PTMTC
Fig. 7Emission spectra of the membrane of HT-29 cell incubated with PTMTC for 24 h and stained with concanavaline A (black squares) and of the PTMTC suspension in medium (red circles). Inset: LSM image of a HT-29 cell taken in the lambda mode
Fig. 8Effect of PTMTC on activity of AlAT, AspAT, ALP, and LDH 3 days after i.p. and i.v. administration of tested compound at dose 250 µg/kg BW. *Significantly different from control, p < 0.05