Literature DB >> 28801885

Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Active surveillance is now widely utilized for the management of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The limits of surveillance for men with intermediate risk cancer are controversial. While there is a broad consensus that men with low-risk disease can be safely managed with AS, many potential candidates, including those with Gleason 3 + 4 disease, PSA >10, younger men and African-Americans are often excluded. RECENT
FINDINGS: Outcome data for intermediate-risk patients managed by active surveillance demonstrate reasonable outcomes, but these men clearly are at higher risk for progression to metastatic disease. The use of biomarkers and multiparametric MRI will enable a more precise and personalized risk assessment. Literature describing the effects of young age on outcomes is limited, but the experience reported in prospective series with 15-20 year follow-up suggests it is a safe approach. African-American men are at greater risk for occult co-existent higher-grade disease, but in the absence of this their outcome is favorable. Patients with intermediate-risk PCa should not be excluded from active surveillance based on a single criterion. Treatment decisions should be based on multiple parameters, including percent Gleason 4, PSA density, cancer volume on biopsy, MRI findings, and patient age and co-morbidity. Genetic tissue-based biomarkers are also likely to play a role in enhancing decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Intermediate risk; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28801885     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0726-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  37 in total

1.  Insignificant disease among men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Emily Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.

Authors:  Adam I Cole; Todd M Morgan; Daniel E Spratt; Ganesh S Palapattu; Chang He; Scott A Tomlins; Alon Z Weizer; Felix Y Feng; Angela Wu; Javed Siddiqui; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi P Kunju; David C Miller; Brent K Hollenbeck; John T Wei; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Active Surveillance in Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Janet E Cowan; Hao G Nguyen; Katsuto K Shinohara; Nannette Perez; Matthew R Cooperberg; William J Catalona; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them?

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The biopsy Gleason score 3+4 in a single core does not necessarily reflect an unfavourable pathological disease after radical prostatectomy in comparison with biopsy Gleason score 3+3: looking for larger selection criteria for active surveillance candidates.

Authors:  R Schiavina; M Borghesi; E Brunocilla; D Romagnoli; D Diazzi; F Giunchi; V Vagnoni; C V Pultrone; H Dababneh; A Porreca; M Fiorentino; G Martorana
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Decipher Genomic Classifier Measured on Prostate Biopsy Predicts Metastasis Risk.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Zaid Haddad; Kasra Yousefi; Lucia L C Lam; Qiqi Wang; Voleak Choeurng; Beatrix Palmer-Aronsten; Christine Buerki; Elai Davicioni; Jianbo Li; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Stephenson; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Toshihiro Yamamoto; H Bindu Musunuru; Danny Vesprini; Liying Zhang; Gabriella Ghanem; Andrew Loblaw; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng Huang; Max Xiangtian Kong; Ming Zhou; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Jonathan Melamed; Fang-Ming Deng
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort.

Authors:  J Cuzick; D M Berney; G Fisher; D Mesher; H Møller; J E Reid; M Perry; J Park; A Younus; A Gutin; C S Foster; P Scardino; J S Lanchbury; S Stone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Nicole Benfante; Ricardo Alvim; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michal Wiseman; Maha Mamoor; Behfar Ehdaie; Vincent Laudone; Peter Scardino; James Eastham; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Glenda Kith; Sarah Lisker; Urmimala Sarkar; Jill Barr-Walker; Benjamin N Breyer; Nynikka R Palmer
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-06

3.  Reduction of MRI-targeted biopsies in men with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance by stratifying to PI-RADS and PSA-density, with different thresholds for significant disease.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Daniel F Osses; Frank-Jan H Drost; Jan F M Verbeek; Sebastiaan Remmers; Geert J L H van Leenders; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

4.  Assessment of suicidal behavior and factors associated with a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marilia Zendron; Stênio C Zequi; Gustavo C Guimarães; Maria Teresa C Lourenço
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Changes in risk-group stratification of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology over time.

Authors:  Benjamin Shiff; Premal Patel; Kiril Trpkov; Geoffrey T Gotto
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-20

6.  PCASTt/SPCG-17-a randomised trial of active surveillance in prostate cancer: rationale and design.

Authors:  Mats Steinholtz Ahlberg; Hans-Olov Adami; Kerri Beckmann; Helena Bertilsson; Ola Bratt; Declan Cahill; Lars Egevad; Hans Garmo; Lars Holmberg; Eva Johansson; Antti Rannikko; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Fredrik Jäderling; Cecilia Wassberg; Ulrika W N Åberg; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.

Authors:  Muammer Altok; Patricia Troncoso; Mary F Achim; Surena F Matin; Graciela N Gonzalez; John W Davis
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  [MRI-guided minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  Fabian Tollens; Niklas Westhoff; Jost von Hardenberg; Sven Clausen; Michael Ehmann; Frank G Zöllner; Anne Adlung; Dominik F Bauer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Dominik Nörenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela K Shill; Monique J Roobol; Behfar Ehdaie; Andrew J Vickers; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

10.  Excessive waitlists and delays to treatment with low-dose-rate brachytherapy predict an increased risk of recurrence and metastases in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Rutvij A Khanolkar; Harvey Quon; Kundan Thind; Michael Sia; Michael Roumeliotis; Siraj Husain; Philip McGeachy; Tyler Meyer; Kevin Martell
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.