Literature DB >> 26225079

Study of Efficacy and the Comparison Between 2.0 mm Locking Plating System and 2.0 mm Standard Plating System in Mandibular Fractures.

B Pavan Kumar1, K A Jeevan Kumar1, V Venkatesh1, A P Mohan1, K Ramesh1, K Mallikarjun1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and comparison between 2.0 mm locking plate system and 2.0 mm Champy's titanium mini plating system in mandible fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients with mandibular fractures were selected and divided into two groups A and B on randomized basis. Group A was treated with open reduction internal fixation using 2.0 mm locking plates and group B with 2.0 mm Champy's titanium miniplates. All patients were followed up for 12 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Results of the study show less screw loosening, less precision in plate adaptation and less alteration of the osseous or occlusal relationship upon screw tightening in group A. Chi square test was applied to compare the results between the two groups. Statistical analysis did not show significant difference of incidence of malocclusion between the two groups (p value = 0.606). Statistical analysis using un-paired t test showed significant difference of working time between the two groups (p value = 0.00296). When comparing the overall complication rates according to plates used, the χ(2) test showed no statistically significant difference between the locking and nonlocking plates (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: It is observed in our study that the locking plate/screw system offers significant advantages over the conventional plating system. The precise adaptation required for using conventional plates is not needed when this locking plate/screw system is used. Locking plate/screw system provides better stability than the conventional plate/screw system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Champy’s mini plates; Locking plate and screw system; Mandibular fractures; Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)

Year:  2014        PMID: 26225079      PMCID: PMC4511910          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0718-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  35 in total

1.  Principle and stability of locking plates.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Brian Alpert; Rainer Schmelzeisen
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  2003-03

2.  Delayed miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  W P Smith
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  [Mandibular osteosynthesis according to the Michelet technic. I. Biomechanical bases].

Authors:  M Champy; J P Lodde; J H Jaeger; A Wilk
Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac       Date:  1976 Apr-May

4.  Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yener Oguz; Sina Uckan; Ahmet Utku Ozden; Eren Uckan; Atilim Eser
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-08

5.  [Mandibular osteosynthesis and compression].

Authors:  M Champy; J P Loddé; D Grasset; D Muster; A Mariano
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast       Date:  1977

6.  [Study of stresses in the fractured mandible in man. Theoretical measurement and verification by extensometric gauges in situ].

Authors:  M Champy; J P Lodde
Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac       Date:  1977

7.  Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  V Singh; I Kumar; A Bhagol
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures. An analysis of 270 fractures treated using the AO/ASIF method.

Authors:  T Iizuka; C Lindqvist
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 9.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Use of a single 2.0-mm locking AO reconstruction titanium plate in linear, non-comminuted, mandible fractures.

Authors:  Babu S Parmar; Kalpesh G Makwana; Aditi M Patel; Ramanuj C Tandel; Jay Shah
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Stabilization of anterior mandibular fracture using different osteosynthesis devices: perioperative clinical notes.

Authors:  Shadia Abdel-Hameed Elsayed; Emad Hussein Elsayed; Alaa Abdelqader Altaweel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patiguli Wusiman; Dilidaer Taxifulati; Li Weidong; Adili Moming
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.080

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.