Literature DB >> 9831052

Choice of anaesthetic and healthcare facility for third molar surgery.

D J Edwards1, M R Brickley, J Horton, M J Edwards, J P Shepherd.   

Abstract

A prospective investigation was carried out to find out which factors affected the choice of anaesthetic for 444 consecutive patients (153 male, 291 female, age range 15-85) listed for extraction of third molars. Two hundred and seventy-two were listed for treatment under general anaesthesia, 120 (44%) as inpatients and 152 (60%) as day cases. The remaining 144 (32%) patients were to be treated under local anaesthesia and 28 (6%) with additional intravenous sedation. Logistic regression analysis showed that difficulty of surgery, patients' anxiety, patients' preferences, medical history, and number of teeth to be removed were important predictors of choice of anaesthetic. From an anaesthetist's perspective, many more patients should have been treated under local anaesthesia with intravenous sedation and fewer should have been listed for inpatient extraction under general anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9831052     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90643-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  8 in total

1.  Importance of Clinical and Radiological Parameters in Assessment of Surgical Difficulty in Removal of Impacted Mandibular 3rd Molars: A New Index.

Authors:  Indraniil Roy; Shridhar D Baliga; Archana Louis; Sanjay Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 2.  Gender-specific differences in the central nervous system's response to anesthesia.

Authors:  Lana J Mawhinney; Davita Mabourakh; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.829

3.  Anaesthesia: over prescription.

Authors:  T Renton; G Gerrard; O Obisesan; I Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  [Treatment anxiety in oral and maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  Dirk Hermes; Bassam Saka; Ludger Bahlmann; Michael Matthes
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-09

5.  Impact of third molar removal on demands for postoperative care and job disruption: does anaesthetic choice make a difference?

Authors:  D J Edwards; J Horton; J P Shepherd; M R Brickley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Review of Difficulty Indices for Removal of Impacted Third Molars and a New Classification of Difficulty Indices.

Authors:  Sonal Priya Bhansali; Sumit Bhansali; Archit Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

7.  Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables.

Authors:  Thiago de Santana-Santos; adson-Alípio-Santana de Souza-Santos; Paulo-Ricardo-Saquete Martins-Filho; Luiz-Carlos-Ferreira da Silva; Emanuel-Dias de Oliveira E Silva; Ana-Claudia-Amorim Gomes
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Dental general anaesthetic receipt among Australians aged 15+ years, 1998-1999 to 2004-2005.

Authors:  Lisa M Jamieson; Kaye F Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.