Literature DB >> 26225007

Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Darpan Bhargava1, Nupur Chakravorty2, Elangovan Rethish3, Ashwini Deshpande4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ropivacaine belongs to pipecoloxylidide group of local anesthetics. There are reports supporting the use of ropivacaine as a long acting local anesthetic in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures, with variable data on the concentration that is clinically suitable.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized double-blind study protocol was undertaken to assess the efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % ropivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. A total of 60 procedures were performed, of which thirty patients received 0.5 % and thirty received 0.75 % concentration of the study drug.
RESULTS: All the patients in both the study groups reported subjective numbness of lip and tongue. The time of onset was longer for 0.5 % ropivacaine when compared to 0.75 % solution. 90 % of the study patients in 0.5 % ropivacaine group reported pain corresponding to VAS ≥3 during bone guttering and 93.3 % patients reported pain corresponding to VAS >4 during tooth elevation. None of the patients in 0.75 % ropivacaine group reported VAS >3 at any stage of the surgical procedure. The duration of soft tissue anesthesia recorded with 0.75 % ropivacaine was average 287.57 ± 42.0 min.
CONCLUSION: 0.75 % ropivacaine was found suitable for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental; Inferior alveolar nerve block; Local anesthesia; Oral surgery; Ropivacaine

Year:  2013        PMID: 26225007      PMCID: PMC4518782          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0534-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  7 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Eman El-Sharrawy; John A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Ropivacaine.

Authors:  J H McClure
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Ropivacaine: the next dental local anesthetic?

Authors:  Amir All-Atabakhsh; Morton B Rosenberg
Journal:  J Mass Dent Soc       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J McClellan; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Maxillary infiltration anaesthesia by ropivacaine for upper third molar surgery.

Authors:  B M B Brkovic; M Zlatkovic; D Jovanovic; D Stojic
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  The efficacy of ropivacaine as a dental local anaesthetic.

Authors:  Susanna Axelsson; Göran Isacsson
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2004

7.  Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Malin Ernberg; Sigvard Kopp
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.895

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Anesthetic Management of a Patient With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Yoshiki Shionoya; Kaoru Hirayama; Kaho Saito; Eriko Kawasaki; Yoko Kantake; Hazuki Okamoto; Takahiro Goi; Katsuhisa Sunada; Kiminari Nakamura
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

Authors:  K Varun Reddy; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Apoorva Mishra; Prachet Dakshinkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine (0.75% & 0.5%) with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) in surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using IANB:a prospective, randomized, single blind study.

Authors:  Kamil N Rajpari; Neelam N Andrade; Trupti Nikalje
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aniket Narayan Kakade; Sanjay S Joshi; Charudatta Shridhar Naik; Bhupendra Vilas Mhatre; Arsalan Ansari
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.