Literature DB >> 26224323

Complicated vascular access port removals: incidence, antecedents and avoidance.

Warwick J Teague1, Dina Fouad, Fraser D Munro, Amanda J McCabe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Port removal is usually a straightforward procedure delegated to trainees. However, some port removals are complicated by central venous catheter (CVC) fragmentation, a challenge for even experienced surgeons. This study aimed to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, complicated port removal in children.
METHODS: A single-centre study assessed the outcome of removal for all paediatric ports inserted from 1996 to 2012. Data were recorded detailing patient, insertion, device and removal characteristics. Risk factors for complicated removals were scrutinised using Chi-square tests; p < 0.05 significant.
RESULTS: Of 628 ports inserted from 1996 to 2012, 443 were subsequently removed at the same centre. 8/443 (1.8%) removals were complicated by CVC fragmentation, a median of 3.3 (2.4-3.9) years after insertion. Of complicated cases, 8/8 underwent formal neck dissection, 3/8 intravascular dissection, and 1/8 endovascular retrieval. 2/8 cases have retained intravascular CVC fragments. Risk factors for complication were CVC caliber <6Fr (p < 0.001) and use duration >2 years (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Greatest care and senior supervision should be ensured when removing ports with CVC caliber <6Fr and/or >2 years since insertion. However, complications also occur with larger CVCs or after shorter durations. Therefore, the key to avoiding complicated port removal may simply be: preparation, preparation, neck preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224323     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3754-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  14 in total

Review 1.  A complication associated with central line removal in the pediatric population: retained fixed catheter fragments.

Authors:  Sarah A Jones; Michael Giacomantonio
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  The mechanisms of failure of totally implantable central venous access system: analysis of 73 cases with fracture of catheter.

Authors:  C H Lin; H S Wu; D C Chan; C B Hsieh; M H Huang; J C Yu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Difficult central venous access removal: case reports of the use of endovascular snare shearing of endothelialized tetherings.

Authors:  Erin A Teeple; William E Shiels; Benedict C Nwomeh; Dorothy V Rocourt; Donna A Caniano
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 4.  Retained central venous lines (CVLs) after attempted removal: an 11-year series and literature review.

Authors:  B K Y Chan; S N Rupasinghe; I Hennessey; I Peart; C T Baillie
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.

Authors:  Patrick A Dillon; Robert P Foglia
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Central venous catheter-related complications in children with oncological/hematological diseases: an observational study of 418 devices.

Authors:  G Fratino; A C Molinari; S Parodi; S Longo; P Saracco; E Castagnola; R Haupt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Difficult extraction of long-term central venous catheters in children--case report.

Authors:  Ilan Maizlin; Heather Carpentier; David Bliss
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 9.  A multiinstitutional review of central venous line complications: retained intravascular fragments.

Authors:  Kris Milbrandt; Paul Beaudry; Ron Anderson; Sarah Jones; Mike Giacomantonio; David Sigalet
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Increased complication rates associated with Port-a-Cath placement in pediatric patients: location matters.

Authors:  Sara C Fallon; Emily L Larimer; Natalie R Gwilliam; Jed G Nuchtern; J Ruben Rodriguez; Timothy C Lee; Monica E Lopez; Eugene S Kim
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.