Literature DB >> 26221439

Validity and Feasibility of the Minicard Direct Observation Tool in 1 Training Program.

Anthony A Donato, Yoon Soo Park, David L George, Alan Schwartz, Rachel Yudkowsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Availability of reliable, valid, and feasible workplace-based assessment (WBA) tools is important to allow faculty to make important and complex judgments about resident competence. The Minicard is a WBA direct observation tool designed to provide formative feedback while supporting critical competency decisions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to collect validity and feasibility evidence for use of the Minicard for formative assessment of internal medicine residents.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of Minicard observations from 2005-2011 in 1 institution to obtain validity evidence, including content (settings, observation rates, independent raters); response process (rating distributions across the scale and ratings by month in the program); consequences (qualitative assessment of action plans); and feasibility (time to collect observations).
RESULTS: Eighty faculty observers recorded 3715 observations of 73 residents in the inpatient ward (43%), clinic (39%), intensive care (15%), and emergency department (3%) settings. Internal medicine residents averaged 28 (SD=8.4) observations per year from 9 (SD=4.1) independent observers. Minicards had an average of 5 (SD=5.1) discrete recorded observations per card. Rating distributions covered the entire rating scale, and increased significantly over the time in training. Half of the observations included action plans with action-oriented feedback, 11% had observational feedback, 9% had minimal feedback, and 30% had no recorded plan. Observations averaged 15.6 (SD=9.5) minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Validity evidence for the Minicard direct observation tool demonstrates its ability to facilitate identification of "struggling" residents and provide feedback, supporting its use for the formative assessment of internal medicine residents.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26221439      PMCID: PMC4512794          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00532.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  15 in total

1.  Construct validity of the miniclinical evaluation exercise (miniCEX).

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Stephen Huot; Jeff Chung; John Norcini; Richard E Hawkins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?

Authors:  Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Monica Yepes; Frederick Williams; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.

Authors:  Reed G Williams; Debra A Klamen; William C McGaghie
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people.

Authors:  Jim Crossley; Brian Jolly
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.

Authors:  C P M van der Vleuten; L W T Schuwirth; E W Driessen; J Dijkstra; D Tigelaar; L K J Baartman; J van Tartwijk
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Competency-based education and training in internal medicine.

Authors:  Steven E Weinberger; Anne G Pereira; William F Iobst; Alex J Mechaber; Michael S Bronze
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  An evaluation of the use of the mini-CEX in the foundation programme.

Authors:  Dawn Jackson; David Wall
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.825

9.  Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students' clinical skills.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Lisa M Bellini; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills.

Authors:  John J Norcini; Linda L Blank; F Daniel Duffy; Gregory S Fortna
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Workplace-Based Assessment and Assessment for Learning: Threats to Validity.

Authors:  Marjan Govaerts
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

2.  Assessing Interpersonal and Communication Skills.

Authors:  Liana Puscas; Jennifer R Kogan; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Direct Observation Tools in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; Jaime Jordan; Jeffrey N Siegelman; Robert Cooney; Christine Stehman; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Design of a clinical competency committee to maximize formative feedback.

Authors:  Anthony A Donato; Richard Alweis; Suzanne Wenderoth
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2016-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.