Literature DB >> 26221100

Arcobacter butzleri and A. cryaerophilus in human, animals and food sources, in southern Chile.

Heriberto Fernandez1, Maria Paz Villanueva1, Ingrid Mansilla2, Mario Gonzalez1, Fadua Latif1.   

Abstract

The isolation frequency of Arcobacter species in children with diarrhea, fowls, mammals and food of avian and marine origin was established. In all the samples it was possible to isolate Arcobacter species corresponding 201 (39.4%) to A. butzleri and 24 (4.7) to A. cryaerophilus . Both species were simultaneously isolated in 19 (3.7%) being A. butzleri the most frequently isolated species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arcobacter diarrhea; food; reservoirs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26221100      PMCID: PMC4512057          DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246120140095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Introduction

Arcobacter sp. belongs to Campylobactereaceae family as was proposed by Vandamme . This genus included 18 species with A. butzleri , A. cryaerophilus and A. skirrowii been considered the only emerging enteropathogens of relevance for animals and humans ( Lehner ; Wesley and Miller, 2010 ; Collado and Figueras, 2011 ; Euzéby, 2014 ). A. skirrowii has been isolated from sheep and cattle with diarrhea, aborted pig fetus, and chronic and acute diarrhea in humans. A . cryaerophilus and A. butzleri have been associated with abortion and enteritis in animals as well as with diarrhea and bacteremia in children and adults. The transmission of these organisms occurred by fecal-oral, waterborne, by food of animal origin or by direct contact with animals ( Lehner ; Wesley and Miller, 2010 ; Collado and Figueras, 2011 ). In Chile there is scarce information regarding this group of bacteria. Fernández reported the first isolates in this country. Due to the clinical relevance of Arcobacter as foodborne pathogen and the need to get more information related to its ecological distribution and prevalence, we present this communication. We are reporting the prevalence of Arcobacter in children with diarrhea, in animal reservoirs and in food of animal origin. The study was performed in the south part of Chile (Los Rios Region, 39º16′ and 40º41′ latitude South and 71º35′ longitude West until the Pacific Ocean).

Material and Methods

We studied a total of 510 samples. The type and origin of the samples are described in Table 1 . Human feces (approx. 2 g) were inoculated into Arcobacter broth (20 mL) and food samples (approx. 25 g previously vortex) were added into 125 mL of Arcobacter broth ( Houf ). After 48 h of incubation at 30 °C under aerobic conditions, 100 microliters aliquots were streaked onto Arcobacter agar plates ( Houf ). Additionally, 400 microliters of enrichment broth were filtrated onto blood agar plates using a 0.45 mμ filter ( Fernández ). All the plates were incubated under the same conditions described above. Colonies with 2 to 4 mm diameter and smooth borders were tested for Gram stain, wet preparation for contrast microscopy, and oxidase and catalase tests. Those colonies with oxidase and catalase positive of rods gram negative with characteristic motility spinning around their long axes under the contrast microscope were considered presumptively Arcobacter sp.. Those colonies were streaked in blood agar plates for confirmatory testing using multiplex PCR as proposed by Houf for the confirmation of the three main species of Arcobacter .
Table 1

Prevalence of Arcobacter species among human, animal and food samples.

OriginTypeNumber A. butzleri A. cryaerophilus A. butzleri + A. cryaerophilus



%%%
ChildrenFeces8333.60000
PigFeces1355540.7139.6128.9
BovineFeces752026.756.734.0
ChickenFeces20210.7420.000
ChickenMeat1259072.021.632.4
ChickenStomach25832.00000
ChickenLiver251872.00014.0
SeafoodMussels22522.70000
Total51020139.4244.7193.7
Prevalence of Arcobacter species among human, animal and food samples.

Results

As indicated on Table 1 , Arcobacter was isolated from all the sample types. A total of 201 (39.4%) strains of A. butzleri , and 24 (4.7%) of A. cryaerophilus were isolated. In 19 (3.7%) of the samples studied both species were recovered simultaneously. From children with diarrhea and from mussels, only A. butzleri was isolated (3.6% and 22.7%, respectively). In chicken feces, A. cryaerophilus was most frequently isolated (20%) than A. butzleri (10%) but in pig and bovine feces occurred the opposite. The frequency of A. butzleri was 40.7% in pigs and 26.7% in bovines while for A. cryaerophylus they were 9.6 and 6.7%, respectively. High frequencies of Arcobacter were found in poultry meat ready for human consumption (chicken meat 92%, muscular stomach 32%, and liver 92%).

Discussion

A . butzleri has been described as the Arcobacter species more frequently isolated from clinical and environmental specimens, as well as from food of animal origin ( Lehner ; Wesley and Miller, 2010 ; Collado and Figueras, 2011 ), and it was confirmed as the most prevalent specie in this study. A. butzleri was the only Arcobacter specie isolated from children with diarrhea with 3.6% prevalence. The prevalence of Arcobacter in this study was higher to the prevalence found by Prouzet-Mauleon in France (1%) and to the prevalence previously reported by Collado in Valdivia, Chile (1.7%). However, the prevalence of Arcobacter in this study was similar to the prevalence observed by Vandenberg in Belgium (3.5%). Similar to the reports of Prouzet-Mauleon and Collado , we were unable to recovery A. skirrowii or A. cryaerophilus from feces of children with diarrhea. The only study in which A. cryaerophilus was isolated from feces of children with diarrhea was the report of Vandenberg but as in other studies included the present one, A. skirrowii was not recovered. In Europe, the reports indicated that Arcobacter species represent the 4 th place in frequency of isolation among the member of the Campylobactereaceae family in samples of fecal origin ( Vandenberg ; Prouzet-Mauleon ). The high prevalence of A. butzleri found in diarrhea, similarly at is occurs with Campylobacter jejuni / coli , might be an indicator of similar risk factors in the environment ( Wesley and Miller, 2010 , Fernández, 2011 ). In chicken feces, A. butzleri was isolated (10%) as well as A. cryaerophilus (20%). The prevalence found in this study is similar to previous studies ( Fernández ; Houf, 2010 ). However, the prevalence of Arcobacter species in pig and bovine feces was lower that the prevalence of Campylobacter species in the same type of samples ( Table 1 ). The findings in this study were similar to results previously reported in the bovine and pig samples ( Fernández, 2011 ; Fernández ; Houf, 2010 ). Some investigators have proposed that the low prevalence of Arcobacter species in chickens is an indicator that this organism is not a natural intestinal commensal in chicken and represent only a transient organism incapable to colonize the gut chicken. A potential explanation for this phenomenon is that the normal corporal temperature in chicken (40.5 to 42 °C) represents a limiting factor for the colonization of chicken with Arcobacter species because their optimal growth temperature range is from 26 to 30°C, contrasting with Campylobacter that is recovered in high prevalence in chicken due to its optimal growth temperature that is around 42°C ( Wesley and Miller, 2010 ; Houf, 2010 ). However, in contrast from the animal samples, the recovery of Arcobacter from poultry meat ready for human consumption is high (92% in chicken meat, 32% in muscular stomach, and 92% in liver). These results of prevalence of Arcobacter in poultry meat are in agreement with those previously reported ( Fernández ; Collado and Figueras, 2011 ). According to Wesley and Miller (2010) and Houf (2010) , the explanation for this discrepancy is that poultry may be contaminated in processing plants and the temperature used for storage of the product (4°C and/or room temperature) may favor the colonization by external sources. The frequency of recovery Arcobacter species was higher in feces from bovine, pigs, and poultry meat samples. Among those samples, A. butzleri and A. cryaerophilus were recovered simultaneously. This observation has been previously reported ( Lehner ; Collado and Figueras, 2011 ; Houf, 2010 ). The prevalence of A. butzleri in mussels was 22.7%, this prevalence was different from previous reports by Fernandez and Collado who reported higher prevalence of A. butzleri and the recovery of additional Arcobacter species in the same type of seafood. In summary, this report confirmed the presence of Arcobacter species in children with diarrhea in the south region of Chile. In addition, this report confirmed the presence of Arcobacter in animal reservoirs and in food of animal origin such as poultry meat and seafood. We believe that the presence of Arcobacter may be an indicator of fecal contamination in the human environment and food supplies. Therefore, it is imperative to establish a constant survey to determine its environmental distribution, its presence in other animal sources as well as the epidemiological relationship between Arcobacter strains isolated from different sources and their mode of transmission. This information will contribute to clarify and a better understanding of the epidemiology of this emerging enteropathogen.
  10 in total

1.  Development of a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and identification of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus and Arcobacter skirrowii.

Authors:  K Houf; A Tutenel; L De Zutter; J Van Hoof; P Vandamme
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  [Campylobacter and campylobacteriosis: a view from South America].

Authors:  Heriberto Fernández
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Taxonomy, epidemiology, and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Maria José Figueras
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Development of a new protocol for the isolation and quantification of Arcobacter species from poultry products.

Authors:  K Houf; L A Devriese; L De Zutter; J Van Hoof; P Vandamme
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-12-30       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov.

Authors:  P Vandamme; E Falsen; R Rossau; B Hoste; P Segers; R Tytgat; J De Ley
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1991-01

Review 6.  Relevant aspects of Arcobacter spp. as potential foodborne pathogen.

Authors:  A Lehner; T Tasara; R Stephan
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Prevalence of Arcobacter in meat and shellfish.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Josep Guarro; Maria José Figueras
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Assessment of the prevalence and diversity of emergent campylobacteria in human stool samples using a combination of traditional and molecular methods.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Magali Gutiérrez; Mario González; Heriberto Fernández
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Arcobacter species in humans.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenberg; Anne Dediste; Kurt Houf; Sandra Ibekwem; Hichem Souayah; Sammy Cadranel; Nicole Douat; G Zissis; J-P Butzler; P Vandamme
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Arcobacter butzleri: underestimated enteropathogen.

Authors:  Valérie Prouzet-Mauléon; Leila Labadi; Nathalie Bouges; Armelle Ménard; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Arcobacter spp. in fecal samples from Brazilian farmed caimans (Caiman yacare, Daudin 1802).

Authors:  Maria Gabriela Xavier Oliveira; Leandro Nogueira Pressinotti; Giovane Spínola Carvalho; Mirela Caroline Vilela Oliveira; Luisa Zanolli Moreno; Carlos Emilio Cabrera Matajira; Alessandro Spínola Bergamo; Victor Manuel Aleixo; Alexandre Caixeta Veiga; Elvis de Souza Corsino; Ana Paula Guarnieri Christ; Maria Inês Zanolli Sato; Andrea Micke Moreno; Terezinha Knöbl
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Shange; Pieter Gouws; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Urbanization Impacts the Physicochemical Characteristics and Abundance of Fecal Markers and Bacterial Pathogens in Surface Water.

Authors:  Tianma Yuan; Kiran Kumar Vadde; Jonathan D Tonkin; Jianjun Wang; Jing Lu; Zimeng Zhang; Yixin Zhang; Alan J McCarthy; Raju Sekar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Arcobacter species in human stool samples derived from out- and inpatients: the prospective German Arcobacter prevalence study Arcopath.

Authors:  Greta Gölz; Markus M Heimesaat; Vanessa Brückner; Ulrike Fiebiger; Ralf Ignatius; Johannes Friesen; Martin Eisenblätter; Marlies Höck; Thomas Alter; Stefan Bereswill
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.181

5.  Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence gene profiles of Arcobacter species isolated from human stool samples, foods of animal origin, ready-to-eat salad mixes and environmental water.

Authors:  Dainius Uljanovas; Greta Gölz; Vanessa Brückner; Audrone Grineviciene; Egle Tamuleviciene; Thomas Alter; Mindaugas Malakauskas
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.181

6.  Genetic diversity of Arcobacter isolated from bivalves of Adriatic and their interactions with Mytilus galloprovincialis hemocytes.

Authors:  Donatella Ottaviani; Francesco Mosca; Serena Chierichetti; Pietro Giorgio Tiscar; Francesca Leoni
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.139

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.