Literature DB >> 26220105

Survivorship and Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Mid-Modular Femoral Stem.

Aldo M Riesgo1, Jason P Hochfelder1, Edward M Adler1, James D Slover1, Lawrence M Specht2, Richard Iorio1.   

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Restoration Modular; loosening; mid-modular femoral stem; revision hip arthroplasty; subsidence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26220105     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Connor Kenney; Steven Dick; Justin Lea; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-02

2.  Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost

Authors:  Thomas J. Wood; Mohammad Alzahrani; `Jacquelyn D. Marsh; Lyndsay E. Somerville; Edward M. Vasarhelyi; Brent A. Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Authors:  Xianshang Zeng; Ke Zhan; Lili Zhang; Dan Zeng; Weiguang Yu; Xinchao Zhang; Mingdong Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Femoral Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed through the Interval of the Direct Anterior Approach.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Ban; Hermann Leitner; Ismail Khosravi; Michael Nogler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Matthias Sukopp; Dominic Taylor; Raimund Forst; Frank Seehaus
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 0.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.