| Literature DB >> 26220105 |
Aldo M Riesgo1, Jason P Hochfelder1, Edward M Adler1, James D Slover1, Lawrence M Specht2, Richard Iorio1.
Abstract
We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.Entities:
Keywords: Restoration Modular; loosening; mid-modular femoral stem; revision hip arthroplasty; subsidence
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26220105 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757