| Literature DB >> 26219661 |
T P Millard1, M Endrizzi1, N Everdell1, L Rigon2, F Arfelli2, R H Menk3, E Stride4, A Olivo1.
Abstract
X-rays are commonly used as a means to image the inside of objects opaque to visible light, as their short wavelength allows penetration through matter and the formation of high spatial resolution images. This physical effect has found particular importance in medicine where x-ray based imaging is routinely used as a diagnostic tool. Increasingly, however, imaging modalities that provide functional as well as morphological information are required. In this study the potential to use x-ray phase based imaging as a functional modality through the use of microbubbles that can be targeted to specific biological processes is explored. We show that the concentration of a microbubble suspension can be monitored quantitatively whilst in flow using x-ray phase contrast imaging. This could provide the basis for a dynamic imaging technique that combines the tissue penetration, spatial resolution, and high contrast of x-ray phase based imaging with the functional information offered by targeted imaging modalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26219661 PMCID: PMC4518216 DOI: 10.1038/srep12509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Stacked sequence of images taken whilst the microbubble concentration flowing through the tube was reduced. Time (s) elapsed from valve opening is indicated on the left of the figure for each frame in seconds, with all frames displayed using the same grayscale. (b) Diagram of the experimental set-up showing the x-ray beam incident on the tubing. (c) Diagram depicting how microbubbles were imaged while flowing through the tubing. (d) Schematic of the microbubble flow phantom showing the region imaged, the inlet and outlet, and the volumes V and Vp. (e) Photograph of the microbubble flow device installed at the SYRMEP beamline at the ELETTRA synchrotron (Italy).
Figure 2Average intensity calculated in a central region of the tube from three image sequences taken with a different microbubble concentration decay constant (D) for each.
Figure 3Plots demonstrating how signal intensity is related to microbubble concentration, (a) contains data from Fig. 2 where time has been converted to microbubble concentration, and (b) the result of subtracting the background intensity. (c) Shows the result of a linear fit to the experimental data in (b). (d) A plot of the residual of the experimental data and fit shown in Fig. 3c, to show the non-linearity of the system response. Markers are the residual, with the line depicting a perfect agreement between experiment and fit.