Literature DB >> 19686297

Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior.

Justin M Carré1, Cheryl M McCormick, Catherine J Mondloch.   

Abstract

Facial width-to-height ratio is a sexually dimorphic metric that is independent of body size and may have been shaped by sexual selection. We recently showed that this metric is correlated with behavioral aggression in men. In Study 1, observers estimated the propensity for aggression of men photographed displaying neutral facial expressions and for whom a behavioral measure of aggression was obtained. The estimates were correlated strongly with the facial width-to-height ratio of the stimulus faces and with the actual aggression of the men. These results were replicated in Study 2, in which the exposure to each stimulus face was shortened to 39 ms. Participants' estimates of aggression for each stimulus face were highly correlated between Study 2 (39-ms exposure) and Study 1 (2,000-ms exposure). These findings suggest that the facial width-to-height ratio may be a cue used to predict propensity for aggression in others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  57 in total

1.  Reassessing the association between facial structure and baseball performance: a comment on Tsujimura & Banissy (2013).

Authors:  William J Mayew
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Testosterone responses to competition predict decreased trust ratings of emotionally neutral faces.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Colton D Baird-Rowe; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.

Authors:  Carmen E Lefevre; Peter J Etchells; Emma C Howell; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Suzanne Hillman; Henry Boc
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

6.  When a face type is perceived as threatening: Using general recognition theory to understand biased categorization of Afrocentric faces.

Authors:  Heather M Kleider-Offutt; Alesha D Bond; Sarah E Williams; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Low-level orientation information for social evaluation in face images.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; M Quiridumbay Verdugo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inferring character from faces: a developmental study.

Authors:  Emily J Cogsdill; Alexander T Todorov; Elizabeth S Spelke; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-02-25

10.  Face Shape and Behavior: Implications of Similarities in Infants and Adults.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Jasmine Boshyan
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2015-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.