Mark MacKay1, Collin Anderson2, Sabrina Boehme2, Jared Cash2, Jeffery Zobell3. 1. Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah mark.mackay@imail.org. 2. Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has stated that parenteral nutrition (PN) is considered a high-risk medication and has the potential of causing harm. Three organizations--American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and National Advisory Group--have published guidelines for ordering, transcribing, compounding and administering PN. These national organizations have published data on compliance to the guidelines and the risk of errors. The purpose of this article is to compare total compliance with ordering, transcription, compounding, administration, and error rate with a large pediatric institution. METHOD: A computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) program was developed that incorporates dosing with soft and hard stop recommendations and simultaneously eliminating the need for paper transcription. A CPOE team prioritized and identified issues, then developed solutions and integrated innovative CPOE and automated compounding device (ACD) technologies and practice changes to minimize opportunities for medication errors in PN prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration. Thirty developmental processes were identified and integrated in the CPOE program, resulting in practices that were compliant with A.S.P.E.N. safety consensus recommendations. Data from 7 years of development and implementation were analyzed and compared with published literature comparing error, harm rates, and cost reductions to determine if our process showed lower error rates compared with national outcomes. RESULTS: The CPOE program developed was in total compliance with the A.S.P.E.N. guidelines for PN. The frequency of PN medication errors at our hospital over the 7 years was 230 errors/84,503 PN prescriptions, or 0.27% compared with national data that determined that 74 of 4730 (1.6%) of prescriptions over 1.5 years were associated with a medication error. Errors were categorized by steps in the PN process: prescribing, transcription, preparation, and administration. There were no transcription errors, and most (95%) errors occurred during administration. CONCLUSION: We conclude that PN practices that conferred a meaningful cost reduction and a lower error rate (2.7/1000 PN) than reported in the literature (15.6/1000 PN) were ascribed to the development and implementation of practices that conform to national PN guidelines and recommendations. Electronic ordering and compounding programs eliminated all transcription and related opportunities for errors.
INTRODUCTION: The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has stated that parenteral nutrition (PN) is considered a high-risk medication and has the potential of causing harm. Three organizations--American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and National Advisory Group--have published guidelines for ordering, transcribing, compounding and administering PN. These national organizations have published data on compliance to the guidelines and the risk of errors. The purpose of this article is to compare total compliance with ordering, transcription, compounding, administration, and error rate with a large pediatric institution. METHOD: A computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) program was developed that incorporates dosing with soft and hard stop recommendations and simultaneously eliminating the need for paper transcription. A CPOE team prioritized and identified issues, then developed solutions and integrated innovative CPOE and automated compounding device (ACD) technologies and practice changes to minimize opportunities for medication errors in PN prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration. Thirty developmental processes were identified and integrated in the CPOE program, resulting in practices that were compliant with A.S.P.E.N. safety consensus recommendations. Data from 7 years of development and implementation were analyzed and compared with published literature comparing error, harm rates, and cost reductions to determine if our process showed lower error rates compared with national outcomes. RESULTS: The CPOE program developed was in total compliance with the A.S.P.E.N. guidelines for PN. The frequency of PN medication errors at our hospital over the 7 years was 230 errors/84,503 PN prescriptions, or 0.27% compared with national data that determined that 74 of 4730 (1.6%) of prescriptions over 1.5 years were associated with a medication error. Errors were categorized by steps in the PN process: prescribing, transcription, preparation, and administration. There were no transcription errors, and most (95%) errors occurred during administration. CONCLUSION: We conclude that PN practices that conferred a meaningful cost reduction and a lower error rate (2.7/1000 PN) than reported in the literature (15.6/1000 PN) were ascribed to the development and implementation of practices that conform to national PN guidelines and recommendations. Electronic ordering and compounding programs eliminated all transcription and related opportunities for errors.
Authors: Emily M Powers; Richard N Shiffman; Edward R Melnick; Andrew Hickner; Mona Sharifi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Evelyne Van den Broucke; Barbara Deleenheer; Ann Meulemans; Julie Vanderstappen; Nelle Pauwels; Katrien Cosaert; Isabel Spriet; Hans Van Veer; Roman Vangoitsenhoven; João Sabino; Peter Declercq; Tim Vanuytsel; Charlotte Quintens Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 4.920
Authors: Theresa Hermanspann; Mark Schoberer; Eva Robel-Tillig; Christoph Härtel; Rangmar Goelz; Thorsten Orlikowsky; Albrecht Eisert Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Julia Hoffmann; Nadja Haiden; Jürgen Babl; Christoph Fusch; Johanna Kostenzer; Brar Piening; Sebastian Schubert; Silke Mader Journal: Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 0.656
Authors: Mercedes Cervera Peris; Víctor Manuel Alonso Rorís; Juan Manuel Santos Gago; Luis Álvarez Sabucedo; Carmina Wanden-Berghe; Javier Sanz-Valero Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 4.773