Literature DB >> 35804275

Offering Guidance and Learning to Prescribers to Initiate Parenteral Nutrition using a Validated Electronic Decision TREE (OLIVE TREE).

Evelyne Van den Broucke1,2, Barbara Deleenheer3,4, Ann Meulemans5,6, Julie Vanderstappen5, Nelle Pauwels5,7, Katrien Cosaert1, Isabel Spriet1,2, Hans Van Veer8,9, Roman Vangoitsenhoven5,6, João Sabino10,11, Peter Declercq1,2, Tim Vanuytsel10,7,11, Charlotte Quintens1,2.   

Abstract

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recommended in patients nutritionally at risk and unable to receive oral or enteral nutrition. A standardized electronic PN order format could enhance appropriate PN prescribing. We developed the OLIVE TREE (Offering guidance and Learning to prescribers to Initiate PN using a Validated Electronic decision TREE), embedded in our electronic health record. We aimed to evaluate its validity and impact on physicians' prescribing behavior. A non-randomized before-after study was carried out in a tertiary care center. The OLIVE TREE comprises 120 individual items. A process validation was performed to determine interrater agreement between a pharmacist and the treating physician. To estimate the proportion of patients for whom the OLIVE TREE had an effective and potential impact on physicians' prescribing behavior, a proof of concept study was conducted. The proportion of patients for whom PN was averted and the proportion of decisions not in line with the recommendation were also calculated. The process validation in 20 patients resulted in an interrater agreement of 95.0%. The proof of concept in 73 patients resulted in an effective and potential impact on prescribing behavior in 50.7% and 79.5% of these patients, respectively. Initiation of PN was not averted and recommendations of the OLIVE TREE were overruled in 42.5% of the patients. Our newly developed OLIVE TREE has a good process validity. A substantial impact on prescribing behavior was observed, although initiation of PN was not avoided. In the next phase, the decision tree will be implemented hospital-wide.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision tree; Parenteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition stewardship; Prescribing; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35804275     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01835-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.920


  45 in total

1.  ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002.

Authors:  J Kondrup; S P Allison; M Elia; B Vellas; M Plauth
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Specific topics and complications of parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Eduardo E Montalvo-Jave; José L Zarraga; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  A multicenter propensity score matched analysis in 73,843 patients of an association of nutritional risk with mortality, length of stay and readmission rates.

Authors:  Ann Meulemans; Christophe Matthys; Roman Vangoitsenhoven; Joao Sabino; Bart Van Der Schueren; Pieter Maertens; Chantal Pans; Pieter Stijnen; Luk Bruyneel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?

Authors:  Patricia Worthington; Jane Balint; Matthew Bechtold; Angela Bingham; Lingtak-Neander Chan; Sharon Durfee; Andrea K Jevenn; Ainsley Malone; Maria Mascarenhas; Daniel T Robinson; Beverly Holcombe
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Parenteral Nutrition Errors and Potential Errors Reported Over the Past 10 Years.

Authors:  Peggi Guenter; Phil Ayers; Joseph I Boullata; Kathleen M Gura; Beverly Holcombe; Gordon S Sacks
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  David S Seres; Monika Valcarcel; Alexandra Guillaume
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition.

Authors:  T Cederholm; R Barazzoni; P Austin; P Ballmer; G Biolo; S C Bischoff; C Compher; I Correia; T Higashiguchi; M Holst; G L Jensen; A Malone; M Muscaritoli; I Nyulasi; M Pirlich; E Rothenberg; K Schindler; S M Schneider; M A E de van der Schueren; C Sieber; L Valentini; J C Yu; A Van Gossum; P Singer
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 8.  The economic cost of hospital malnutrition in Europe; a narrative review.

Authors:  Saman Khalatbari-Soltani; Pedro Marques-Vidal
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  Association of nutritional risk and adverse medical outcomes across different medical inpatient populations.

Authors:  Susan Felder; Christian Lechtenboehmer; Martina Bally; Rebecca Fehr; Manuela Deiss; Lukas Faessler; Alexander Kutz; Deborah Steiner; Anna C Rast; Svenja Laukemann; Prasad Kulkarni; Zeno Stanga; Sebastian Haubitz; Andreas Huber; Beat Mueller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 10.  Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system.

Authors:  Lisa A Barker; Belinda S Gout; Timothy C Crowe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.