Literature DB >> 26211433

Gender differences in the neural network of facial mimicry of smiles--An rTMS study.

Sebastian Korb1, Jennifer Malsert2, Vincent Rochas3, Tonia A Rihs3, Sebastian W Rieger4, Samir Schwab5, Paula M Niedenthal6, Didier Grandjean2.   

Abstract

Under theories of embodied emotion, exposure to a facial expression triggers facial mimicry. Facial feedback is then used to recognize and judge the perceived expression. However, the neural bases of facial mimicry and of the use of facial feedback remain poorly understood. Furthermore, gender differences in facial mimicry and emotion recognition suggest that different neural substrates might accompany the production of facial mimicry, and the processing of facial feedback, in men and women. Here, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was applied to the right primary motor cortex (M1), the right primary somatosensory cortex (S1), or, in a control condition, the vertex (VTX). Facial mimicry of smiles and emotion judgments were recorded in response to video clips depicting changes from neutral or angry to happy facial expressions. While in females rTMS over M1 and S1 compared to VTX led to reduced mimicry and, in the case of M1, delayed detection of smiles, there was no effect of TMS condition for males. We conclude that in female participants M1 and S1 play a role in the mimicry and in the use of facial feedback for accurate processing of smiles.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial mimicry; Gender differences; Motor cortex; Somatosensory cortex; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26211433     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  21 in total

1.  Sensorimotor simulation and emotion processing: Impairing facial action increases semantic retrieval demands.

Authors:  Joshua D Davis; Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A sad thumbs up: incongruent gestures and disrupted sensorimotor activity both slow processing of facial expressions.

Authors:  Adrienne Wood; Jared D Martin; Martha W Alibali; Paula M Niedenthal
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-11-15

4.  Preferential activation for emotional Western classical music versus emotional environmental sounds in motor, interoceptive, and language brain areas.

Authors:  Rebecca J Lepping; Jared M Bruce; Kathleen M Gustafson; Jinxiang Hu; Laura E Martin; Cary R Savage; Ruth Ann Atchley
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The causal role of the somatosensory cortex in prosocial behaviour.

Authors:  Laila Blömer; Carolina Fernandes-Henriques; Anna Henschel; Balint Kalista Lammes; Tatjana Maskaljunas; Selene Gallo; Riccardo Paracampo; Laura Müller-Pinzler; Mario Carlo Severo; Judith Suttrup; Alessio Avenanti; Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Where is emotional feeling felt in the body? An integrative review.

Authors:  Steven Davey; Jamin Halberstadt; Elliot Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Blocking facial mimicry during binocular rivalry modulates visual awareness of faces with a neutral expression.

Authors:  Thomas Quettier; Filippo Gambarota; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Paola Sessa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does Facial Amimia Impact the Recognition of Facial Emotions? An EMG Study in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Soizic Argaud; Sylvain Delplanque; Jean-François Houvenaghel; Manon Auffret; Joan Duprez; Marc Vérin; Didier Grandjean; Paul Sauleau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spontaneous Facial Mimicry is Modulated by Joint Attention and Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Janina Neufeld; Christina Ioannou; Sebastian Korb; Leonhard Schilbach; Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.216

10.  She more than he: gender bias supports the empathic nature of yawn contagion in Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Ivan Norscia; Elisa Demuru; Elisabetta Palagi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.