Literature DB >> 34936672

Where is emotional feeling felt in the body? An integrative review.

Steven Davey1, Jamin Halberstadt2, Elliot Bell3.   

Abstract

Contemporary research on "embodied emotion" emphasizes the role of the body in emotional feeling. The evidence base on interoception, arguably the most prominent strand of embodied emotion research, places emphasis on the cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. In turn, interoception has evidence-based links with improved emotion regulation. Despite the focus on separate bodily systems, it is unclear whether particular interoceptive locations play a greater role in emotional feeling and emotion regulation. Further, according to Gross' "process model", the sooner that regulation of an emotion occurs, the better; hence, it is additionally important to identify the first body areas to activate. These issues are investigated in a two-stage integrative review. The first stage was preliminary, giving an overview of the evidence base to highlight the distribution of measured body areas. This indicated that 86% of publications (n = 88) measured cardiac activity, 26% measured the respiratory system, and six percent the gastrointestinal system. Given the emphasis placed on all three systems in interoception theory and research on emotion, this suggests a dearth of comprehensive findings pertaining to feeling locations. The second stage investigated the core issues of where emotional feelings are felt in the body and time-related implications for regulation. This was based on ten texts, which together suggested that the head, throat and chest are the most consistently detected locations across and within numerous emotional contexts. Caution is required, however, since-among other reasons discussed-measurement was not time-restricted in these latter publications, and direct physiological measurement was found in only a minority of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34936672      PMCID: PMC8694467          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  130 in total

1.  Autonomic responses to affective visual stimuli.

Authors:  R Klorman; A R Wiesenfeld; M L Austin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review.

Authors:  Sylvia D Kreibig
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Bradygastric activity of the stomach predicts disgust sensitivity and perceived disgust intensity.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Eric R Muth; Beate M Herbert
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Comparison of physiological responses to affect eliciting pictures and music.

Authors:  Jongwan Kim; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Bodily maps of emotions are culturally universal.

Authors:  Sofia Volynets; Enrico Glerean; Jari K Hietanen; Riitta Hari; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  Interoceptive cardiac expectations to emotional stimuli predict visual perception.

Authors:  Amanda C Marshall; Antje Gentsch; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-07-01

7.  Emotional reactivity and interoceptive sensitivity: Exploring the role of age.

Authors:  Mai Bjørnskov Mikkelsen; Mia Skytte O'Toole; Marlene Skovgaard Lyby; Sebastian Wallot; Mimi Mehlsen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-08

8.  Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.

Authors:  J J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-01

9.  Bodily maps of emotions.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Enrico Glerean; Riitta Hari; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA).

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Cynthia Price; Jennifer J Daubenmier; Mike Acree; Elizabeth Bartmess; Anita Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.