Andy S Huang1, Patrick Skeba1, Myung S Yang2, Francis P Sgambati3, Christopher J Earley2, Richard P Allen4. 1. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. The Center for Interdisciplinary Sleep Research and Education, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: richardjhu@mac.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) script (MATPLM1) was developed to rigorously apply World Associations of Sleep Medicine (WASM) scoring criteria for periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS) from bilateral electromyographic (EMG) leg recordings. This study compares MATPLM1 with both standard technician and expert detailed visual PLMS scoring. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Validation was based on a 'macro' level by agreement for PLMS/h during a night recording and on a 'micro' level by agreement for the detection of each PLMS from a stratified random sample for each subject. Data available for these analyses were from 15 restless leg syndrome (RLS) (age: 61.5 ± 8.5, 60% female) and nine control subjects (age: 61.4 ± 7.1, 67% female) participating in another study. RESULTS: In the 'micro' analysis, MATPLM1 and the visual detection of PLMS events agreed 87.7% for technician scoring and 94.4% for expert scoring. The technician and MATPLM1 scoring disagreements were checked for 36 randomly selected events, 97% involved clear technician-scoring error. In the 'macro' analysis, MATPLM1 rates of PMLS/h correlated highly with visual scoring by the technician (r(2) = 0.97) and the expert scorer (r(2) = 0.99), but the technician scoring was consistently less than MATPLM1: median (quartiles) difference: 10 (5, 23). There was little disagreement with expert scorer [median (quartile) difference: -0.3 (-2.4, 0.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: The MATPLM1 produces reliable scoring of PLMS that matches expert scoring. The standard visual scoring without careful measuring of events tends to significantly underscore PLMS. These preliminary results support the use of MATPLM1 as a preferred method of scoring PLMS for EMG recordings that are of a good quality and without significant sleep-disordered breathing events.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) script (MATPLM1) was developed to rigorously apply World Associations of Sleep Medicine (WASM) scoring criteria for periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS) from bilateral electromyographic (EMG) leg recordings. This study compares MATPLM1 with both standard technician and expert detailed visual PLMS scoring. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Validation was based on a 'macro' level by agreement for PLMS/h during a night recording and on a 'micro' level by agreement for the detection of each PLMS from a stratified random sample for each subject. Data available for these analyses were from 15 restless leg syndrome (RLS) (age: 61.5 ± 8.5, 60% female) and nine control subjects (age: 61.4 ± 7.1, 67% female) participating in another study. RESULTS: In the 'micro' analysis, MATPLM1 and the visual detection of PLMS events agreed 87.7% for technician scoring and 94.4% for expert scoring. The technician and MATPLM1 scoring disagreements were checked for 36 randomly selected events, 97% involved clear technician-scoring error. In the 'macro' analysis, MATPLM1 rates of PMLS/h correlated highly with visual scoring by the technician (r(2) = 0.97) and the expert scorer (r(2) = 0.99), but the technician scoring was consistently less than MATPLM1: median (quartiles) difference: 10 (5, 23). There was little disagreement with expert scorer [median (quartile) difference: -0.3 (-2.4, 0.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: The MATPLM1 produces reliable scoring of PLMS that matches expert scoring. The standard visual scoring without careful measuring of events tends to significantly underscore PLMS. These preliminary results support the use of MATPLM1 as a preferred method of scoring PLMS for EMG recordings that are of a good quality and without significant sleep-disordered breathing events.
Authors: Marco Zucconi; Raffaele Ferri; Richard Allen; Paul Christian Baier; Oliviero Bruni; Sudhansu Chokroverty; Luigi Ferini-Strambi; Stephany Fulda; Diego Garcia-Borreguero; Wayne A Hening; Max Hirshkowitz; Birgit Högl; Magdolna Hornyak; Martin King; Pasquale Montagna; Liborio Parrino; Giuseppe Plazzi; Mario G Terzano Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2006-02-03 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Raffaele Ferri; Mauro Manconi; Bartolo Lanuzza; Filomena I I Cosentino; Oliviero Bruni; Luigi Ferini-Strambi; Marco Zucconi Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Richard P Allen; Daniel L Picchietti; Diego Garcia-Borreguero; William G Ondo; Arthur S Walters; John W Winkelman; Marco Zucconi; Raffaele Ferri; Claudia Trenkwalder; Hochang B Lee Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Thomas C Wetter; Gerhard Dirlich; Jonathan Streit; Claudia Trenkwalder; Andreas Schuld; Thomas Pollmächer Journal: Sleep Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Patrick Skeba; Stephany Fulda; Kasidet Hiranniramol; Christopher J Earley; Richard P Allen Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609