Literature DB >> 26209608

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals that Intact Histone H1 Phosphorylations are Variant Specific and Exhibit Single Molecule Hierarchical Dependence.

Yu Chen1, Michael E Hoover2, Xibei Dang3, Alan A Shomo3, Xiaoyan Guan1, Alan G Marshall4, Michael A Freitas5, Nicolas L Young6.   

Abstract

Breast cancer was the second leading cause of cancer related mortality for females in 2014. Recent studies suggest histone H1 phosphorylation may be useful as a clinical biomarker of breast and other cancers because of its ability to recognize proliferative cell populations. Although monitoring a single phosphorylated H1 residue is adequate to stratify high-grade breast tumors, expanding our knowledge of how H1 is phosphorylated through the cell cycle is paramount to understanding its role in carcinogenesis. H1 analysis by bottom-up MS is challenging because of the presence of highly homologous sequence variants expressed by most cells. These highly basic proteins are difficult to analyze by LC-MS/MS because of the small, hydrophilic nature of peptides produced by tryptic digestion. Although bottom-up methods permit identification of several H1 phosphorylation events, these peptides are not useful for observing the combinatorial post-translational modification (PTM) patterns on the protein of interest. To complement the information provided by bottom-up MS, we utilized a top-down MS/MS workflow to permit identification and quantitation of H1 proteoforms related to the progression of breast cells through the cell cycle. Histones H1.2 and H1.4 were observed in MDA-MB-231 metastatic breast cells, whereas an additional histone variant, histone H1.3, was identified only in nonneoplastic MCF-10A cells. Progressive phosphorylation of histone H1.4 was identified in both cell lines at mitosis (M phase). Phosphorylation occurred first at S172 followed successively by S187, T18, T146, and T154. Notably, phosphorylation at S173 of histone H1.2 and S172, S187, T18, T146, and T154 of H1.4 significantly increases during M phase relative to S phase, suggesting that these events are cell cycle-dependent and may serve as markers for proliferation. Finally, we report the observation of the H1.2 SNP variant A18V in MCF-10A cells.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209608      PMCID: PMC4813703          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M114.046441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  75 in total

1.  Sequential phsophorylation of histone subfractions in the Chinese hamster cell cycle.

Authors:  L R Gurley; R A Walters; R A Tobey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1975-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Improved ion extraction from a linear octopole ion trap: SIMION analysis and experimental demonstration.

Authors:  Bruce E Wilcox; Christopher L Hendrickson; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  PLU-1 is an H3K4 demethylase involved in transcriptional repression and breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Kenichi Yamane; Keisuke Tateishi; Robert J Klose; Jia Fang; Laura A Fabrizio; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Joyce Taylor-Papadimitriou; Paul Tempst; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Inhibition of histone phosphorylation by staurosporine leads to chromosome decondensation.

Authors:  J P Th'ng; X W Guo; R A Swank; H A Crissman; E M Bradbury
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Dephosphorylation of histones H1 and H3 during the isolation of metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  J A D'Anna; L R Gurley; L L Deaven
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Global histone H4K20 trimethylation predicts cancer-specific survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Christin Schneider; Lukas C Heukamp; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Guido Fechner; Patrick J Bastian; Alexander von Ruecker; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence.

Authors:  David B Seligson; Steve Horvath; Tao Shi; Hong Yu; Sheila Tze; Michael Grunstein; Siavash K Kurdistani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  One-pot shotgun quantitative mass spectrometry characterization of histones.

Authors:  Mariana D Plazas-Mayorca; Barry M Zee; Nicolas L Young; Ian M Fingerman; Gary LeRoy; Scott D Briggs; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Global levels of histone modifications predict prognosis in different cancers.

Authors:  David B Seligson; Steve Horvath; Matthew A McBrian; Vei Mah; Hong Yu; Sheila Tze; Qun Wang; David Chia; Lee Goodglick; Siavash K Kurdistani
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 4.307

View more
  18 in total

1.  Analyses of Histone Proteoforms Using Front-end Electron Transfer Dissociation-enabled Orbitrap Instruments.

Authors:  Lissa C Anderson; Kelly R Karch; Scott A Ugrin; Mariel Coradin; A Michelle English; Simone Sidoli; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Benjamin A Garcia; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Evaluation of Spectral Counting for Relative Quantitation of Proteoforms in Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Lucía Geis-Asteggiante; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg; Catherine Fenselau; Nathan J Edwards
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Integrating Proteomics and Targeted Metabolomics to Understand Global Changes in Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Johayra Simithy; Simone Sidoli; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  The impact of cruciferous vegetable isothiocyanates on histone acetylation and histone phosphorylation in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Besma Abbaoui; Kelly H Telu; Christopher R Lucas; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Steven J Schwartz; Steven K Clinton; Michael A Freitas; Amir Mortazavi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Middle-Down Characterization of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Histone H4 Posttranslational Modifications and Proteoforms.

Authors:  Tingting Jiang; Michael E Hoover; Matthew V Holt; Michael A Freitas; Alan G Marshall; Nicolas L Young
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Jake A Melby; David S Roberts; Eli J Larson; Kyle A Brown; Elizabeth F Bayne; Song Jin; Ying Ge
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Expeditious Extraction of Histones from Limited Cells or Tissue Samples and Quantitative Top-Down Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew V Holt; Tao Wang; Nicolas L Young
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2021-02

Review 8.  Histone variant-specific post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Faith M Joseph; Nicolas L Young
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 7.499

Review 9.  Mass spectrometry-based characterization of histones in clinical samples: applications, progress, and challenges.

Authors:  Roberta Noberini; Giulia Robusti; Tiziana Bonaldi
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.622

Review 10.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.