Literature DB >> 26209280

Mandatory Intensivist Management Decreases Length of Stay, Facilitates an Increase in Admissions and Minimizes Closure of a Neurocritical Care Unit.

M B Rodricks1,2, S E Hawkins3, G A Anderson3, C Basignani3,4, M Tuppeny5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary objectives of this study were to identify patient and community benefits of mandatory intensivist management in a neurocritical care (NCC) unit. Our hospital recently mandated intensivist management for patients admitted to the NCC unit. As one of the only comprehensive stroke centers in Orlando, an unacceptably high number of patients were being denied admission because of overcapacity. We compared length of stay (LOS), complications, outcomes, total admissions, and emergency transfer center closure rates before and after implementation of mandatory intensivist management.
METHODS: A retrospective review comparing 1551 patients admitted to a 20 bed NCC unit from November 1, 2009 to October 31, 2010 (prior to mandatory intensivist management) with 1702 patients admitted from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (after the requirement) was performed. This included examining LOS, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (APACHE) scores, service line closure rates, and mortality during both time periods.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed that despite comparable APACHE scores, implementation of mandatory intensivist management reduced overall NCC LOS, 4.6 versus 3.7 days, (p < 0.01) and increased the number of monthly admissions, 129 versus 142, (p = 0.02). The percentage of patients declined admission because of a closed service line was reduced from 12.36 to 5.66 %, (p = 0.02). Mortality and infection rates remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of mandatory intensivist management in the NCC unit decreased LOS, increased admissions, and decreased service line closure rates, while maintaining patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensivist; Length of stay; Neurocritical care; Patient outcomes; Quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209280     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0148-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  11 in total

1.  Need for intensivists in intensive-care units.

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  A new ICU paradigm: intensivists as primary critical care physicians.

Authors:  Marc J Popovich; Shahpour Esfandiari; Azmy Boutros
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 3.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Derek C Angus; Todd Dorman; Karen A Robinson; Tony T Dremsizov; Tammy L Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effect on ICU mortality of a full-time critical care specialist.

Authors:  J J Brown; G Sullivan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Impact of a neuroscience intensive care unit on neurosurgical patient outcomes and cost of care: evidence-based support for an intensivist-directed specialty ICU model of care.

Authors:  M A Mirski; C W Chang; R Cowan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.956

6.  Impact of a dedicated neurocritical care team in treating patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Owen Samuels; Adam Webb; Steve Culler; Kathleen Martin; Daniel Barrow
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Improvement in intensive care unit outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage after initiation of neurointensivist co-management.

Authors:  S Andrew Josephson; Vanja C Douglas; Michael T Lawton; Joey D English; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Impact of a neurointensivist on outcomes in critically ill stroke patients.

Authors:  Lisa Knopf; Ilene Staff; Joao Gomes; Louise McCullough
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Impact of a neurointensivist on outcomes in patients with head trauma treated in a neurosciences intensive care unit.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Varelas; Dan Eastwood; Hyun J Yun; Marianna V Spanaki; Lotfi Hacein Bey; Christos Kessaris; Thomas A Gennarelli
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Length of stay and mortality in neurocritically ill patients: impact of a specialized neurocritical care team.

Authors:  Jose I Suarez; Osama O Zaidat; Muhammad F Suri; Eliahu S Feen; Gwendolyn Lynch; Janice Hickman; Alexandros Georgiadis; Warren R Selman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neuro-Intensivists as Effective Resource Managers. No, Really.

Authors:  Andrew M Naidech
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  A Novel Neuroscience Intermediate-Level Care Unit Model: Retrospective Analysis of Impact on Patient Flow and Safety.

Authors:  Alexandra E Quimby; Michel C F Shamy; Deanna M Rothwell; Erin Y Liu; Dar Dowlatshahi; Grant Stotts
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2016-10-15

3.  Evidence supports the superiority of closed ICUs for patients and families: Yes.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Twitter Journal Club Impact on Engagement Metrics of the Neurocritical Care Journal.

Authors:  Aarti Sarwal; Masoom Desai; Pallavi Juneja; Joni K Evans; Abhay Kumar; Eelco Wijdicks
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.532

5.  The impact of intensive care unit physician staffing change at a community hospital.

Authors:  Christopher D Adams; Luigi Brunetti; Liza Davidov; Jose Mujia; Michael Rodricks
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-01-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.