Literature DB >> 15640647

Length of stay and mortality in neurocritically ill patients: impact of a specialized neurocritical care team.

Jose I Suarez1, Osama O Zaidat, Muhammad F Suri, Eliahu S Feen, Gwendolyn Lynch, Janice Hickman, Alexandros Georgiadis, Warren R Selman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality and length of stay in patients admitted to the neurosciences critical care unit.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database.
SETTING: Neurosciences critical care unit of a large academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients (n = 2381) admitted to our neurosciences critical care unit from January 1997 to April 2000.
INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of a specialized neurocritical care team.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data obtained from the database included demographics, admission source, length of stay, neurosciences critical care unit and hospital disposition, admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, and principal and secondary diagnoses. The introduction of a neurocritical care team in September 1998 was also collected, as was death at 1 yr after admission. Univariate analysis was carried out using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test (significance, p < .05). A logistic regression model was used to create a prediction model for in-hospital and long-term mortality. A general linear model was used to determine predictors of length of stay (after log transformation). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality included APACHE III (odds ratio, 1.07 [1.06-1.08]) and admission from another intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.9 [1.4-6.2]). The presence of a neurocritical care team was an independent predictor of decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.7 [0.5-1.0], p = .044). Admission after the neurocritical care team was implemented was associated with reduced length of stay in both the neurosciences critical care unit (4.2 +/- 4.0 vs. 3.7 +/- 3.4, p < .001) and the hospital (9.9 +/- 8.0 vs. 8.4 +/- 6.9, p < .0001). There was no difference in readmission rates to the intensive care unit or discharge disposition to home before and after the neurocritical care team was established. The availability of the neurocritical care team was not associated with significant changes in long-term mortality. Factors independently associated with long-term mortality included female gender, admission from another intensive care unit, APACHE III score, and being moderately disabled before admission.
CONCLUSION: Introduction of a neurocritical care team, including a full-time neurointensivist who coordinated care, was associated with significantly reduced in-hospital mortality and length of stay without changes in readmission rates or long-term mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15640647     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000146132.29042.4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  99 in total

1.  [Indications and outcome of ventilated patients treated in a neurological intensive care unit].

Authors:  D Steffling; M Ritzka; W Jakob; A Steinbrecher; S Schwab-Malek; B Kaiser; P Hau; S Boy; K Fuchs; U Bogdahn; F Schlachetzki
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Emergency and critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen A Figueroa; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Cutting edge of neurocritical care.

Authors:  Jonathan Rosand; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Pediatric neurocritical care.

Authors:  Sarah Murphy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  The appointment of neurointensivists is financially beneficial to the employer.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Varelas; Tamer Abdelhak; Jody Wellwood; Donald Benczarski; Stanton B Elias; Mark Rosenblum
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Continuous electroencephalography for subarachnoid hemorrhage has come of age.

Authors:  Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  A Novel Neuroscience Intermediate-Level Care Unit Model: Retrospective Analysis of Impact on Patient Flow and Safety.

Authors:  Alexandra E Quimby; Michel C F Shamy; Deanna M Rothwell; Erin Y Liu; Dar Dowlatshahi; Grant Stotts
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2016-10-15

8.  Impact of interhospital transfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashley R Catalano; H R Winn; Errol Gordon; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Impact of hospital case-volume on subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes: A nationwide analysis adjusting for hemorrhage severity.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Kali Romano; Mohammad Ashkanani; Robert C McDermid; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  Expertise Matters.

Authors:  Edward M Manno; William D Freeman; Sarah Livesay; Romergryko G Geocadin; Michel Torbey; Paul Nyquist; Claude Hemphill
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.