Alexandra E Quimby1, Michel C F Shamy2, Deanna M Rothwell3, Erin Y Liu3, Dar Dowlatshahi2, Grant Stotts4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurointensive care units have been shown to improve patient outcomes across a variety of neurological and neurosurgical conditions. However, the efficacy of less resource-intensive intermediate-level care units to deliver similar care has not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of neurocritical specialist comanagement on patient flow and safety in a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit. METHODS: Our intervention consisted of the addition of a physician with critical care experience as well as training in neurology, anesthesiology, or intensive care to a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit to comanage patients alongside neurology and neurosurgery staff during weekday daytime hours. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data pertaining to all patients admitted to the unit over a 3-year period, 1 year before our intervention and 2 years after. Patient statistics including wait times to admission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: Following the intervention, there were significant reductions in wait times to unit admission from both the emergency department and postanesthetic care unit, as well as reductions in the average LOS. No significant safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that the optimization of a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit involving comanagement of patients by a neurocritical specialist can reduce wait times to admission and lengths of stay, with preserved safety outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurointensive care units have been shown to improve patient outcomes across a variety of neurological and neurosurgical conditions. However, the efficacy of less resource-intensive intermediate-level care units to deliver similar care has not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of neurocritical specialist comanagement on patient flow and safety in a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit. METHODS: Our intervention consisted of the addition of a physician with critical care experience as well as training in neurology, anesthesiology, or intensive care to a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit to comanage patients alongside neurology and neurosurgery staff during weekday daytime hours. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data pertaining to all patients admitted to the unit over a 3-year period, 1 year before our intervention and 2 years after. Patient statistics including wait times to admission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: Following the intervention, there were significant reductions in wait times to unit admission from both the emergency department and postanesthetic care unit, as well as reductions in the average LOS. No significant safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that the optimization of a neuroscience intermediate-level care unit involving comanagement of patients by a neurocritical specialist can reduce wait times to admission and lengths of stay, with preserved safety outcomes.
Authors: J Claude Hemphill; Steven M Greenberg; Craig S Anderson; Kyra Becker; Bernard R Bendok; Mary Cushman; Gordon L Fung; Joshua N Goldstein; R Loch Macdonald; Pamela H Mitchell; Phillip A Scott; Magdy H Selim; Daniel Woo Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S Andrew Josephson; Vanja C Douglas; Michael T Lawton; Joey D English; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Boyd F Richards; J Brett Fleming; Chevis N Shannon; Beverly C Walters; Mark R Harrigan Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Gabriel J Escobar; John D Greene; Peter Scheirer; Marla N Gardner; David Draper; Patricia Kipnis Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Barbara C J Solberg; Carmen D Dirksen; Fred H M Nieman; Godefridus van Merode; Graham Ramsay; Paul Roekaerts; Martijn Poeze Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Corey R Fehnel; Kimberly M Glerum; Linda C Wendell; N Stevenson Potter; Brian Silver; Muhib Khan; Ali Saad; Shadi Yaghi; Richard N Jones; Karen Furie; Bradford B Thompson Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2017-06-02
Authors: Donna Lee Armaignac; Anshul Saxena; Muni Rubens; Carlos A Valle; Lisa-Mae S Williams; Emir Veledar; Louis T Gidel Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.598