Literature DB >> 26209232

Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses With Varying Add Powers.

Jin Sun Kim1, Ji Won Jung2, Ji Min Lee3, Kyoung Yul Seo3, Eung Kweon Kim3, Tae-Im Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes after implantation of TECNIS diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different add powers.
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, interventional case series.
METHODS: Subjects underwent cataract extraction and diffractive multifocal IOL implant. Subjects had an additional add power of +2.75 diopters (D) (Group 1, 23 eyes), +3.25 D (Group 2, 21 eyes), or +4.00 D (Group 3, 21 eyes). Evaluations were performed 1 and 3 months following cataract surgery, including measurement of monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refractive error (manifest refraction [MR]), and monocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 33, 40, and 50 cm. At 3 months, internal aberrations and contrast sensitivity were evaluated and subjects completed a questionnaire on outcomes satisfaction, visual symptoms, and spectacle use.
RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes (43 subjects) were included. After surgery, no significant differences between groups were observed in UDVA and MR values. UNVA at 33 cm was best in Group 3 (1 month: P = .032; 3 months: P = .031). Three months after surgery, UNVA was best in Group 1 at 50 cm (P = .017). No significant differences in internal aberration and contrast sensitivity were observed between groups and surgical satisfaction was worst in Group 3 (P = .001). A total of 87.0%, 85.7%, and 76.9% had spectacle independence in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .080).
CONCLUSIONS: TECNIS diffractive multifocal IOLs with lower add powers provide good vision over longer working distances and excellent distant vision. Subjects with lower add power had greater satisfaction, more spectacle independence, and fewer visual symptoms than those with +4.00 D add.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209232     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Özge Güngör Akkuş; Ikbal Seza Petriçli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Visual acuity of pseudophakic patients predicted from in-vitro measurements of intraocular lenses with different design.

Authors:  Fidel Vega; Maria S Millán; Nuria Garzón; Irene Altemir; Francisco Poyales; Jose Manuel Larrosa
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Clinical outcomes of a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Baha Toygar; Ozge Yabas Kiziloglu; Okan Toygar; Ali Murat Hacimustafaoglu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Predictive factors for photic phenomena after refractive, rotationally asymmetric, multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Hungwon Tchah; Kiyeun Nam; Aeri Yoo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Comparison of visual outcomes after two types of mix-and-match implanted trifocal extended-depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Jung Wan Kim; Youngsub Eom; Wonkyung Park; Jong Suk Song; Ji Won Jeong; Seh Kwang Park; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Clinical outcomes with a new design in multifocal intraocular lens: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Pilar Yébana; Mario Cantó; Ana B Plaza; Alfredo Vega; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Francisco Lugo
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-18

7.  Results of a clinical evaluation of a trifocal intraocular lens in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Yuka Ota; Ken Hayashi; Chizuka Igarashi; Noriyuki Sasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Prospective study of bilateral mix-and-match implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in Koreans.

Authors:  Chan Min Yang; Dong Hui Lim; Sungsoon Hwang; Joo Hyun; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Evaluation of activities of daily living following pseudophakic presbyopic correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Panagiota Ntonti; Maria Patsiamanidi; Haris Sideroudi; Kimon Georgantzoglou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-19

10.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.