Literature DB >> 26209009

Shared decision making: why do patients choose ureteroscopy?

Mohamed Omar1, Sarah Tarplin1, Robert Brown1, Sri Sivalingam1, Manoj Monga2.   

Abstract

To evaluate patient's characteristics that affects their decision on the management of asymptomatic renal calculi, and to determine the impact of anesthetic on the selection of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). A survey was distributed to 100 patients in our multi-disciplinary stone clinic. The patients were given a hypothetical scenario of an asymptomatic 8 mm lower pole stone and descriptions for managements options including active surveillance (annual radiography, 40% chance of growth >10 mm within 4 years, 20% chance of passage), SWL under conscious sedation (65% success rate), and URS (90% success rate, with stent placement for 1 week). Patients were asked what was the most important variable impacting the choice of treatment. Patients preferred SWL (45%) over URS (32%) and active surveillance (23%). Patients with a previous experience with URS were more likely to choose it again (p = 0.0433). Decisions were driven primarily by success rate (52%), followed by risk of complications (29%), postoperative pain (7%) and others (12%). Patients choosing URS had the highest magnitude of history of pain (p = 0.03) and were more likely to prioritize success (78%) and less likely to prioritize surgical risk (13%) or anticipated pain after surgery (0%) (p = 0.01). Most (85%) of the patients would rely on the physician's recommendation for the treatment modality. Patients place differing value on risk versus success. As they rely heavily on the physician's recommendation, it is important that their urologist determine whether risk or success is of highest priority for them to facilitate a shared medical decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counseling; Patients’ preference; SWL; URS; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26209009     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0806-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  15 in total

1.  Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results.

Authors:  D M Albala; D G Assimos; R V Clayman; J D Denstedt; M Grasso; J Gutierrez-Aceves; R I Kahn; R J Leveillee; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso; L C Munch; S Y Nakada; R C Newman; M S Pearle; G M Preminger; J Teichman; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  T S SZASZ; M H HOLLENDER
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1956-05

3.  Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis.

Authors:  H B Joshi; A Stainthorpe; F X Keeley; R MacDonagh; A G Timoney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Dean G Assimos; Peter Alken; Colin Buck; Michele Gallucci; Thomas Knoll; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret Sue Pearle; Kemal Sarica; Christian Türk; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; Y I Siegel; B Steele; A W Nyhuis; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Geoffrey Joyce; Anga R Timilsina
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones.

Authors:  F X Keeley; K Tilling; A Elves; P Menezes; M Wills; N Rao; R Feneley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; G Schubert; T Rosenkranz; A Weigl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: balancing benefit and risk.

Authors:  Carl Sarkissian; Mark Noble; Jianbo Li; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Stones in 2015: Changes in stone management - suspending belief for evidence.

Authors:  Sapan N Ambani; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Treatment options and outcomes for lower pole stone management: are we there yet?

Authors:  Patrick Jones; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Omar Aboumarzouk; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Decision-making and improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with kidney stones: comparing surgery versus observation using a mixed methods analysis.

Authors:  Connor M Forbes; Kemberlee Bonnet; Tracy Bryant; David G Schlundt; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Ryan S Hsi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.861

5.  Contemporary treatment trends for upper urinary tract stones in a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2019: will shock wave lithotripsy become extinct?

Authors:  Roman Herout; Martin Baunacke; Christer Groeben; Cem Aksoy; Björn Volkmer; Marcel Schmidt; Nicole Eisenmenger; Rainer Koch; Sven Oehlschläger; Christian Thomas; Johannes Huber
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

Authors:  Laura A Shinkunas; Caleb J Klipowicz; Erica M Carlisle
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.