Literature DB >> 25162953

Characterization of patients receiving palliative chemo- and radiotherapy during end of life at a regional cancer center in Norway.

Malin Anshushaug1, Mari Aas Gynnild, Stein Kaasa, Anne Kvikstad, Bjørn H Grønberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many cancer patients receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy their last 30 days [end of life (EOL)]. The benefit is questionable and side effects are common. The aim of this study was to investigate what characterized the patients who received chemo- and radiotherapy during EOL, knowledge that might be used to improve practice.
METHODS: Patients dead from cancer in 2005 and 2009 were analyzed. Data were collected from hospital medical records. When performance status (PS) was not stated, PS was estimated from other information in the records. A Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) of 0, 1 or 2 was assessed from blood values (CRP and albumin). A higher score is associated with a shorter prognosis.
RESULTS: In total 616 patients died in 2005; 599 in 2009. Among the 723 analyzed, median age was 71; 42% had metastases at diagnosis (synchronous metastases); 53% had PS 2 and 16% PS 3-4 at the start of last cancer therapy. GPS at the start of last cancer therapy was assessable in 70%; of these, 26% had GPS 1 and 35% GPS 2. Overall, 10% received chemotherapy and 8% radiotherapy during EOL. The proportions varied significantly between the different types of cancer. Multivariate analyses revealed that those at age<70 years, GPS 2, no contact with our Palliative Care Unit and synchronous metastases received most chemotherapy the last 30 days. PS 3-4, GPS 2 and synchronous metastases were strongest associated with radiotherapy the last 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Ten percent received chemotherapy and 8% radiotherapy the last 30 days of life. GPS 2 and synchronous metastases were most significantly associated with cancer therapy the last 30 days of life, indicating that in general, patients with the shortest survival time after diagnosis of cancer received more chemo- and radiotherapy during EOL than other patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25162953     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.948061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  11 in total

1.  Prevalence and determinants of end-of-life chemotherapy use in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Aju Mathew; Tala Achkar; Shira Abberbock; Gurprataap S Sandhu; Mini Elizabeth Jacob; Vipin Das Villgran; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Shannon Puhalla; Adam M Brufsky
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Palliative radiotherapy during the last month of life: Predictability for referring physicians and radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Kent Angelo; Astrid Dalhaug; Adam Pawinski; Ellinor Haukland; Jan Norum
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life.

Authors:  Holly G Prigerson; Yuhua Bao; Manish A Shah; M Elizabeth Paulk; Thomas W LeBlanc; Bryan J Schneider; Melissa M Garrido; M Carrington Reid; David A Berlin; Kerin B Adelson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  The LabBM score is an excellent survival prediction tool in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Astrid Dalhaug; Ellinor Haukland
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-09-30

5.  Geriatric assessment factors are associated with mortality after hospitalization in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Sushma Jonna; Leslie Chiang; Jingxia Liu; Maria B Carroll; Kellie Flood; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Glasgow prognostic score: Useful information when prescribing palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Bård Mannsåker; Astrid Dalhaug; Adam Pawinski; Ellinor Haukland
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-26

7.  The healthcare costs of treating human papillomavirus-related cancers in Norway.

Authors:  Hannah Hylin; Helene Thrane; Kine Pedersen; Ivar S Kristiansen; Emily A Burger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Adverse events in deceased hospitalised cancer patients as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.

Authors:  Ellinor Christin Haukland; Christian von Plessen; Carsten Nieder; Barthold Vonen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Single-institution analysis of the prevalence, indications and outcomes of end-of-life radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sebastian M Christ; Markus Schettle; Annina Seiler; Matthias Guckenberger; David Blum; Nicolaus Andratschke; Caroline Hertler
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.