Literature DB >> 26203807

Superconductivity emerging from a suppressed large magnetoresistant state in tungsten ditelluride.

Defen Kang1, Yazhou Zhou1, Wei Yi1, Chongli Yang1, Jing Guo1, Youguo Shi1, Shan Zhang1, Zhe Wang1, Chao Zhang1, Sheng Jiang2, Aiguo Li2, Ke Yang2, Qi Wu1, Guangming Zhang3, Liling Sun4, Zhongxian Zhao4.   

Abstract

The recent discovery of large magnetoresistance in tungsten ditelluride provides a unique playground to find new phenomena and significant perspective for potential applications. The large magnetoresistance effect originates from a perfect balance of hole and electron carriers, which is sensitive to external pressure. Here we report the suppression of the large magnetoresistance and emergence of superconductivity in pressurized tungsten ditelluride via high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electrical resistance, magnetoresistance and alternating current magnetic susceptibility measurements. Upon increasing pressure, the positive large magnetoresistance effect is gradually suppressed and turned off at a critical pressure of 10.5 GPa, where superconductivity accordingly emerges. No structural phase transition is observed under the pressure investigated. In situ high-pressure Hall coefficient measurements at low temperatures demonstrate that elevating pressure decreases the population of hole carriers but increases that of the electron ones. Significantly, at the critical pressure, a sign change of the Hall coefficient is observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26203807      PMCID: PMC4525168          DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Tungsten ditelluride (WTe2) is a well-known non-magnetically thermoelectric semimetal123. Recently, its unexpected property of large magnetoresistance (LMR) has been discovered4, yielding a research hotspot in condensed matter physics and material science. The LMR effect found in WTe2 and some other nonmagnetic compounds45678910 is a peculiar transport property. At ambient pressure, WTe2 crystallizes in a crystal structure of distorted MoS2 (ref. 11), and the distortion is induced by the tungsten chains that are arranged along the a axis of the orthorhombic unit cell. The electrical resistance along the a axis increases markedly when magnetic field is applied perpendicularly to the dichalcogenide layers (along the c axis), resulting in the LMR effect. Theoretical and experimental investigations indicate that the LMR effect is resulted from the perfect balance between electron and hole Fermi pockets along the Γ–X direction in the Brillouin zone41213, different from that of giant and colossal magnetoresistance previously found in magnetic materials1415. Due to the complicated band structure with multiple Fermi pockets in WTe2, the fine details of the electronic structure play a significant role in the LMR effect. It is well known that pressure as an important control parameter can effectively tune lattice structures and the corresponding electronic states in a more systematic fashion, avoiding the complexity brought by chemical doping131617181920. In particular, the Fermi surface changes had been observed in pressurized NbSe2 and NbS2 (ref. 21 and ref. 22, respectively). Therefore, the high-pressure studies on WTe2 are important to explore novel phenomena and understand the physics behind. We demonstrate here that how external pressure suppresses the LMR state and induces the emergence of superconductivity in WTe2 with the experimental results from multiple in situ high-pressure measurements. We find that, upon increasing pressure, the inter-plane lattice constant c is substantially reduced without structural phase transition, while the LMR effect is gradually suppressed and turned off at a critical pressure of 10.5 GPa where superconductivity accordingly emerges. The superconducting transition temperature (Tc) reaches 6.5 K at ∼13.0 GPa and then decreases monotonically with increasing pressure down to 2.6 K at ∼24.0 GPa. Significantly, our Hall measurements reveal a sign change in the Hall coefficient at the critical pressure, indicating a quantum phase transition of the Fermi surface reconstruction. During the preparation of this manuscript, we became aware of an arXiv paper that reports the evidence of pressure-induced superconductivity in WTe2 from electrical resistance measurements without a pressure-transmitting medium23.

Results

Structure under pressure

We first characterize the structure of the WTe2 sample at ambient pressure. Figure 1a shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of a powdered sample that is ground from a few pieces of single crystals. As it can be seen, the Bragg peaks in the pattern can be well indexed by orthorhombic structure. To clarify whether there is a structure change in pressurized WTe2, we perform in situ high-pressure synchrotron XRD measurements. The results shown in Fig. 2a indicate no first-order structure phase transition under pressure up to 20.1 GPa. Then we extract the lattice parameters as a function of pressure, shown in Fig. 2b,c. The pressure dependence of volume also displays in Fig. 2d. It is found that the lattice constants (a, b and c) as well as the volume decrease continuously upon increasing pressure. However, the reduction of c is substantial, compared with those of the in-plane parameters.
Figure 1

Experimental and indexed X-ray diffraction patterns of WTe2 at ambient pressure.

The purple crosses represent experimental data, and the cyan line and bars represent calculated Bragg reflection pattern and positions. The inset shows the three-dimensional layer structure constructed by an edge-shared WTe6 octahedron.

Figure 2

Structure information of WTe2 sample at high pressure.

(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of WTe2 collected at different pressures, showing no crystal structure transition. (b,c) Pressure dependence of lattice constants (a, b and c). The error bars represent s.d. (d) Volume change as a function of pressure.

Pressure-induced superconductivity

The electrical resistance measurement for the single crystal is performed under quasi-hydrostatic pressure. Since WTe2 has an anisotropic electron structure, the LMR effect was discovered along the tungsten chain direction (a axis)4. To reveal the pressure effect on the LMR state, we apply the magnetic field and current in the same manner as ambient pressure. Figure 3 shows the typical temperature dependence of electrical resistance measured at zero magnetic field for pressures ranging from 0.3 to 24.0 GPa. In Fig. 3a, the electrical resistance curve at 0.3 GPa shares the similar behaviour to that measured at ambient pressure413. Upon increasing pressure below 13.0 GPa, the electrical resistance in the whole temperature range is suppressed, while it is enhanced above 13.0 GPa. Intriguingly, at the pressure of 10.5 GPa, the resistance drops abruptly at 2.8 K. Such a drop becomes more pronounced at higher pressures, and the zero-electrical resistance is achieved between 11.0 and 24.0 GPa (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3

Electrical resistance and susceptibility features of single-crystal WTe2 at different pressures.

(a) The plot of electrical resistance as a function of temperature measured without magnetic field for the pressures ranging from 0.3 to 13.0 GPa. The inset displays the enlarged view of the low-temperature electrical resistance, where a characteristic temperature is defined by the minimum resistance and is taken as turn-on temperature (T*ZF) of the LMR effect, as indicated by arrows. (b) Temperature dependence of electrical resistance measured at different pressures between 13.0 and 24.0 GPa. The inset clearly shows electrical resistance drops and zero-resistance behaviour. (c) The real part of the a.c. magnetic susceptibility (χ′) versus temperature for the single-crystal WTe2 at different pressures, which confirms the diamagnetism at the selected pressures of 15.0 and 18.3 GPa, respectively. The arrows indicate the onset temperatures of the superconducting transitions.

To confirm whether the zero-electrical resistance state is superconducting or not, we carry out in situ high-pressure alternating-current (a.c.) susceptibility measurements. The Meissner effect is observed at the selected pressures of 15.0 and 18.3 GPa, respectively (Fig. 3c). The onset temperatures of the diamagnetism are consistent with that of the electrical resistance drop (Fig. 3b). Both electrical resistance and magnetic measurements coordinately confirm that pressure induces a superconducting transition in WTe2. The Tc can reach to 6.5 K at ∼13.0 GPa and monotonically decreases down to 2.6 K at ∼24.0 GPa.

Suppression of the LMR state

To reveal how the LMR state evolves into the superconducting state, we systematically investigate the temperature dependence of electrical resistance at fixed pressures under different magnetic fields. We find that the positive LMR effect of WTe2 is suppressed by applying pressure (Fig. 4a,b). At the pressure of 11.0 GPa and above, the positive magnetoresistance effect no longer exists (Fig. 4c,d), and the superconductivity appears simultaneously.
Figure 4

High-pressure electrical resistance versus temperature under different magnetic fields.

(a,b) The electrical resistance as a function of temperature at 0.3 and 2.4 GPa, respectively, illustrating the obvious suppression of the LMR effect by increasing pressure. (c) The plot of resistance versus temperature at 11.0 GPa. The inset shows an enlarged view of a full suppression of the positive magnetoresistance and a zero resistance at 3.2 K. (d) The temperature dependence of electrical resistance at 13.0 GPa. The inset displays the elimination of superconductivity by magnetic fields.

Determination of upper critical magnetic field

Notably, the superconductivity of the sample is fully suppressed at 13.0 GPa under 3 and 7 Tesla (Fig. 4d). To determine the value of upper critical magnetic field (Hc2) precisely, we perform the temperature dependence of resistance measurements under lower magnetic fields on the pressurized sample (Fig. 5a–c). Using the Ginzburg–Landau formula to fit the experimental data yields the values of upper critical magnetic field at zero temperature: 1.86 T at 13.7 GPa, 1.44 T at 16.0 GPa and 0.85 T at 19.4 GPa (Fig. 5d).
Figure 5

Determination of the value of upper critical field (Hc2) for the superconducting WTe2.

(a–c) Temperature dependence of electrical resistance at fixed pressures under different magnetic fields. (d) Hc2 as a function of temperature. The dashed lines represent the Ginzburg–Landau (GL) fits.

Pressure–temperature phase diagram

A characteristic temperature (T*ZF) as the turn-on temperature of the LMR effect at zero field is defined, as indicated by the arrows in the inset of Fig. 3a. Such a definition of the T*ZF is coincident with the temperature of the linear extrapolation of turn-on LMR temperatures under different magnetic fields. Then we summarize our experimental results in the pressure–temperature phase diagram (Fig. 6a). There are two distinct regions in the diagram: the LMR state and the superconducting state. It is found that the T*ZF of the LMR state decreases with increasing pressure and vanishes at the critical pressure 10.5 GPa, where the superconductivity emerges at 2.8 K. The value of Tc increases up to a maximum at 13.0 GPa and then declines with further increasing pressure. This phase diagram clearly demonstrates how the pressure can effectively suppress the LMR state and induce superconductivity.
Figure 6

Pressure–temperature phase diagram of WTe2 and pressure-dependent Hall coefficient.

(a) The T*ZF and Tc versus pressure. The red, pink and blue solid circles represent Tc extracted from different runs of electrical resistance measurements, and the green triangles represent the Tc determined from the a.c. susceptibility measurements. The acronyms LMR and SC stand for the large magnetoresistant state and superconducting state, respectively. The error bars represent the s.d. (b) Hall coefficient (RH) as a function of pressure measured at 10 K and 1 Tesla, displaying a sign change from the positive to the negative at the critical pressure of 10.5 GPa. Solid purple circles and pink squares represent the RH obtained from different runs. The inset shows the second derivative of the Hall coefficient, the maximum of which corresponds to the sign change of Hall coefficient. The shaded area indicates the pressure range where the superconductivity emerges and the sign of RH changes.

Change of Hall coefficient with pressure

It is known that the perfect balance between hole and electron populations accounts for the ambient-pressure LMR effect412. To understand the suppression of the LMR effect under pressure, we conduct the in situ high-pressure Hall coefficient (RH) measurements at low temperature (Fig. 6b). The set-up of our high-pressure Hall measurements leads to the detected RH combining signals from the two components of parallel and perpendicular to the tungsten chains (see Methods). Thus, the obtained results involve contributions from both hole and electron carries at the Fermi surface in the Brillouin zone. Below 10.5 GPa, the RH is positive and it decreases with elevating pressure. On further increasing pressure, significantly, we find that the RH suffers from a sign change from the positive to the negative at the critical pressure of 10.5 GPa, where the LMR state vanishes and superconductivity emerges.

Discussion

The sign change in RH is an indication of a significant reconstruction of Fermi surface, in good agreement with the reported Shubnikov-de-Hass oscillation measurements13. At the critical pressure, the second derivative of the Hall coefficient with respect to pressure shows a maximum, which is expected to become divergent in the zero temperature limit. Actually, our high-pressure XRD measurements indicate that, at the critical pressure, the c axis is compressed by 6.5%, almost 10-fold of the a-axis compressibility (0.6%) and twofold of the b-axis compressibility (3.3%). These results suggest that the reconstruction of Fermi surface is associated with anisotropic reductions of the lattice. We thus propose that a quantum phase transition occurs at the critical pressure, separating the LMR state and superconducting state. Such a kind of quantum phase transition with the changes of the Fermi surface structure can be characterized by the Lifshitz phase transition24, so the emergence of superconductivity observed in the pressurized WTe2 may be connected with this transition, reminiscent of what is seen in Fe-based superconductors25. The mechanism of superconductivity in WTe2 deserves further investigations from both experimental and theoretical sides.

Methods

Single-crystal growth

Single crystals of WTe2 were grown by means of a solid-state reaction. Tungsten powder (99.9%) was mixed with excessive amounts of tellurium (99.999%) and placed in an alumina ampoule, then sealed in an evacuated quartz tube. The operation above was performed in a glove box filled with high-purity argon gas. The mixture was heated in a furnace to 1,000 °C with a rate of 100 °C h−1, followed by keeping the temperature at 1,000 °C for 5 h. After reaction, the sample was cooled down to 800 °C at a rate of 1 °C h−1, then to 700 °C at a rate of 5 °C h−1. The quartz tube was then taken out from the furnace, and put in a centrifuge to remove the Te flux.

Experimental details of high-pressure measurements

Pressure was generated by a device, the so-called diamond anvil cell that consists of two opposing anvils sitting on the supporting plates. Diamond anvils of 300-μm flats were used for this study. Nonmagnetic rhenium gaskets with a 100-μm diameter hole were used for different runs of the high-pressure studies. The four-probe method was applied in the ab plane of the single-crystal WTe2 for all high-pressure transport measurements. For the high-pressure Hall coefficient measurements, the van der Pauw method was applied in this study. A constant current goes through the squared sample diagonally, and the Hall voltage is measured from the other diagonal. To keep the sample in a quasi-hydrostatic pressure environment, NaCl powder was employed as the pressure medium. The high-pressure alternating-current susceptibilities were detected using a primary/secondary-compensated coil system surrounding the sample26. High-pressure XRD experiments were performed at beam line 15U at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. A monochromatic X-ray beam with a wavelength of 0.6199 Å was chosen for all XRD measurements. Diamonds with low birefringence were selected for the experiments. To maintain the sample in a hydrostatic pressure environment, silicon oil was used as a pressure medium in the high-pressure XRD measurements. Pressure was determined by the ruby fluorescence method27.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Kang, D. et al. Superconductivity emerging from a suppressed large magnetoresistant state in tungsten ditelluride. Nat. Commun. 6:7804 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8804 (2015).
  13 in total

1.  Re-emerging superconductivity at 48 kelvin in iron chalcogenides.

Authors:  Liling Sun; Xiao-Jia Chen; Jing Guo; Peiwen Gao; Qing-Zhen Huang; Hangdong Wang; Minghu Fang; Xiaolong Chen; Genfu Chen; Qi Wu; Chao Zhang; Dachun Gu; Xiaoli Dong; Lin Wang; Ke Yang; Aiguo Li; Xi Dai; Ho-kwang Mao; Zhongxian Zhao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1988-11-21       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Drastic Pressure Effect on the Extremely Large Magnetoresistance in WTe2: Quantum Oscillation Study.

Authors:  P L Cai; J Hu; L P He; J Pan; X C Hong; Z Zhang; J Zhang; J Wei; Z Q Mao; S Y Li
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Physics. A quantum critical route to field-induced superconductivity.

Authors:  A P Mackenzie; S A Grigera
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pressure induced effects on the Fermi surface of superconducting 2H-NbSe2.

Authors:  H Suderow; V G Tissen; J P Brison; J L Martínez; S Vieira
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Electronic structure basis for the extraordinary magnetoresistance in WTe2.

Authors:  I Pletikosić; Mazhar N Ali; A V Fedorov; R J Cava; T Valla
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2.

Authors:  Tian Liang; Quinn Gibson; Mazhar N Ali; Minhao Liu; R J Cava; N P Ong
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 43.841

8.  Large, non-saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2.

Authors:  Mazhar N Ali; Jun Xiong; Steven Flynn; Jing Tao; Quinn D Gibson; Leslie M Schoop; Tian Liang; Neel Haldolaarachchige; Max Hirschberger; N P Ong; R J Cava
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Pressure-driven dome-shaped superconductivity and electronic structural evolution in tungsten ditelluride.

Authors:  Xing-Chen Pan; Xuliang Chen; Huimei Liu; Yanqing Feng; Zhongxia Wei; Yonghui Zhou; Zhenhua Chi; Li Pi; Fei Yen; Fengqi Song; Xiangang Wan; Zhaorong Yang; Baigeng Wang; Guanghou Wang; Yuheng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Pressure-induced superconducting state of europium metal at low temperatures.

Authors:  M Debessai; T Matsuoka; J J Hamlin; J S Schilling; K Shimizu
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  21 in total

1.  Pressure-induced phase transitions and superconductivity in a black phosphorus single crystal.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Jianping Sun; Prashant Shahi; Miao Gao; Allan H MacDonald; Yoshiya Uwatoko; Tao Xiang; John B Goodenough; Jinguang Cheng; Jianshi Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The structural phases and vibrational properties of Mo1-xWxTe2 alloys.

Authors:  Sean M Oliver; Ryan Beams; Sergiy Krylyuk; Irina Kalish; Arunima K Singh; Alina Bruma; Francesca Tavazza; Jaydeep Joshi; Iris R Stone; Stephan J Stranick; Albert V Davydov; Patrick M Vora
Journal:  2d Mater       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.103

3.  Characterization of Few-Layer 1T' MoTe2 by Polarization-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation and Raman Scattering.

Authors:  Ryan Beams; Luiz Gustavo Cançado; Sergiy Krylyuk; Irina Kalish; Berç Kalanyan; Arunima K Singh; Kamal Choudhary; Alina Bruma; Patrick M Vora; Francesca Tavazza; Albert V Davydov; Stephan J Stranick
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Magnetoelastoresistance in WTe2: Exploring electronic structure and extremely large magnetoresistance under strain.

Authors:  Na Hyun Jo; Lin-Lin Wang; Peter P Orth; Sergey L Bud'ko; Paul C Canfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Two-dimensional inorganic analogues of graphene: transition metal dichalcogenides.

Authors:  Manoj K Jana; C N R Rao
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Prediction of an arc-tunable Weyl Fermion metallic state in Mo(x)W(1-x)Te2.

Authors:  Tay-Rong Chang; Su-Yang Xu; Guoqing Chang; Chi-Cheng Lee; Shin-Ming Huang; BaoKai Wang; Guang Bian; Hao Zheng; Daniel S Sanchez; Ilya Belopolski; Nasser Alidoust; Madhab Neupane; Arun Bansil; Horng-Tay Jeng; Hsin Lin; M Zahid Hasan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Critical enhancement of thermopower in a chemically tuned polar semimetal MoTe2.

Authors:  Hideaki Sakai; Koji Ikeura; Mohammad Saeed Bahramy; Naoki Ogawa; Daisuke Hashizume; Jun Fujioka; Yoshinori Tokura; Shintaro Ishiwata
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Coherent optical phonon oscillation and possible electronic softening in WTe2 crystals.

Authors:  Bin He; Chunfeng Zhang; Weida Zhu; Yufeng Li; Shenghua Liu; Xiyu Zhu; Xuewei Wu; Xiaoyong Wang; Hai-Hu Wen; Min Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2.

Authors:  Yanpeng Qi; Pavel G Naumov; Mazhar N Ali; Catherine R Rajamathi; Walter Schnelle; Oleg Barkalov; Michael Hanfland; Shu-Chun Wu; Chandra Shekhar; Yan Sun; Vicky Süß; Marcus Schmidt; Ulrich Schwarz; Eckhard Pippel; Peter Werner; Reinald Hillebrand; Tobias Förster; Erik Kampert; Stuart Parkin; R J Cava; Claudia Felser; Binghai Yan; Sergey A Medvedev
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Signatures of the topological s +- superconducting order parameter in the type-II Weyl semimetal T d-MoTe2.

Authors:  Z Guguchia; F von Rohr; Z Shermadini; A T Lee; S Banerjee; A R Wieteska; C A Marianetti; B A Frandsen; H Luetkens; Z Gong; S C Cheung; C Baines; A Shengelaya; G Taniashvili; A N Pasupathy; E Morenzoni; S J L Billinge; A Amato; R J Cava; R Khasanov; Y J Uemura
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.