Adeleh Yarmohammadi1, Linda M Zangwill1, Alberto Diniz-Filho1, Luke J Saunders1, Min Hee Suh2, Zhichao Wu1, Patricia Isabel C Manalastas1, Tadamichi Akagi3, Felipe A Medeiros1, Robert N Weinreb4. 1. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea. 3. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: rweinreb@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare hemifield differences in the vessel density of the peripapillary and macula in open-angle glaucoma eyes with visual field (VF) defect confined to one hemifield using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 58 eyes of 58 patients with glaucoma with VF loss confined to a single hemifield and 28 healthy eyes. METHODS: Retinal vasculature information was summarized as circumpapillary vessel density (cpVD) and perifoveal vessel density (pfVD). Circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex (mGCC) thickness were calculated using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT). Paired and unpaired t tests were used to evaluate differences between the perimetrically affected and intact hemiretinae and healthy hemiretinae. Linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between VF measures with vascular and structural measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total and hemispheric cpVD, pfVD, cpRNFL, mGCC, and mean sensitivity (MS). RESULTS: Mean cpVD and pfVD in the intact hemiretinae of glaucoma eyes (59.0% and 51.1%, respectively) were higher than in the affected hemiretinae (54.7% and 48.3%, respectively; P < 0.001) but lower than in healthy eyes (62.4% and 53.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Similar results were noted with cpRNFL and mGCC thickness measurements (P < 0.05 for both). The strongest associations between MS in the affected hemifields were found for cpVD (r = 0.707), followed by pfVD (r = 0.615), cpRNFL (r = 0.496), and mGCC (r = 0.482) in the corresponding hemiretinae (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, the correlations in the intact hemifields between MS with cpVD and pfVD were higher (r = 0.450 and 0.403) than the correlations between MS and cpRNFL and mGCC thickness measurements (r = 0.340 and 0.290; P values <0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced peripapillary and macular vessel density was detectable in the perimetrically intact hemiretinae of glaucoma eyes with a single-hemifield defect. Vessel density attenuation in both affected and intact hemiretinae was associated with the extent of VF damage in the corresponding hemifields. Optical coherence tomography angiography potentially shows promise for identifying glaucomatous damage before focal VF defects are detectable.
PURPOSE: To compare hemifield differences in the vessel density of the peripapillary and macula in open-angle glaucoma eyes with visual field (VF) defect confined to one hemifield using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 58 eyes of 58 patients with glaucoma with VF loss confined to a single hemifield and 28 healthy eyes. METHODS: Retinal vasculature information was summarized as circumpapillary vessel density (cpVD) and perifoveal vessel density (pfVD). Circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex (mGCC) thickness were calculated using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT). Paired and unpaired t tests were used to evaluate differences between the perimetrically affected and intact hemiretinae and healthy hemiretinae. Linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between VF measures with vascular and structural measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total and hemispheric cpVD, pfVD, cpRNFL, mGCC, and mean sensitivity (MS). RESULTS: Mean cpVD and pfVD in the intact hemiretinae of glaucoma eyes (59.0% and 51.1%, respectively) were higher than in the affected hemiretinae (54.7% and 48.3%, respectively; P < 0.001) but lower than in healthy eyes (62.4% and 53.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Similar results were noted with cpRNFL and mGCC thickness measurements (P < 0.05 for both). The strongest associations between MS in the affected hemifields were found for cpVD (r = 0.707), followed by pfVD (r = 0.615), cpRNFL (r = 0.496), and mGCC (r = 0.482) in the corresponding hemiretinae (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, the correlations in the intact hemifields between MS with cpVD and pfVD were higher (r = 0.450 and 0.403) than the correlations between MS and cpRNFL and mGCC thickness measurements (r = 0.340 and 0.290; P values <0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced peripapillary and macular vessel density was detectable in the perimetrically intact hemiretinae of glaucoma eyes with a single-hemifield defect. Vessel density attenuation in both affected and intact hemiretinae was associated with the extent of VF damage in the corresponding hemifields. Optical coherence tomography angiography potentially shows promise for identifying glaucomatous damage before focal VF defects are detectable.
Authors: Liang Liu; Yali Jia; Hana L Takusagawa; Alex D Pechauer; Beth Edmunds; Lorinna Lombardi; Ellen Davis; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Mitra Sehi; Iman Goharian; Ranjith Konduru; Ou Tan; Sowmya Srinivas; Srinivas R Sadda; Brian A Francis; David Huang; David S Greenfield Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yali Jia; John C Morrison; Jason Tokayer; Ou Tan; Lorinna Lombardi; Bernhard Baumann; Chen D Lu; Woojhon Choi; James G Fujimoto; David Huang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ryuna Chang; Andrew J Nelson; Vivian LeTran; Brian Vu; Bruce Burkemper; Zhongdi Chu; Ali Fard; Amir H Kashani; Benjamin Y Xu; Ruikang K Wang; Rohit Varma; Grace M Richter Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Patricia I C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; Fabio B Daga; Mark A Christopher; Luke J Saunders; Takuhei Shoji; Tadamichi Akagi; Rafaella C Penteado; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Min H Suh; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Shawn Philip; Ahmad Najafi; Apichat Tantraworasin; Toco Y P Chui; Richard B Rosen; Robert Ritch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Nathanael J Fuller; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Luke J Saunders; Min Hee Suh; Kyle Hasenstab; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Patricia I C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; Luke J Saunders; Kaweh Mansouri; Akram Belghith; Min Hee Suh; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Rafaella C Penteado; Tadamichi Akagi; Takuhei Shoji; Robert N Weinreb Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.503