Waqas T Qureshi1, Zaid Alirhayim2,3, Fatima Khalid1, Mouaz H Al-Mallah4,5,6. 1. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA. 2. Henry Ford Hospital/Wayne State University, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 3. The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. 4. Henry Ford Hospital/Wayne State University, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. mouaz74@gmail.com. 5. Wayne State University, 540 E Canfield St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. mouaz74@gmail.com. 6. King Abdul-Aziz Cardiac Center, King Abdul-Aziz Medical City (Riyadh), Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, MC 1413, P.O. Box 22490, Riyadh, 11426, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. mouaz74@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attenuation corrected computed tomography (CTAC) is often performed to improve the specificity of single-photon emission tomography imaging. Extracardiac incidental findings are frequently observed. It is unclear whether these findings have any prognostic value. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 1139) at a tertiary care center were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings on CTAC. Clinically significant incidental findings were defined as findings warranting physician follow-up. Information regarding subsequent resource utilization was obtained by chart review. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for demographic and clinical variables was used to evaluate association of these incidental findings with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 135 (12%) patients with incidental findings were identified, 83 of whom (68%) were newly diagnosed. Lung nodules were the most common finding, present in 92 (68%) patients. Over a median follow-up of 468 days, incidental findings were not significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.77-2.33, P = 0.29) but was significantly associated with cancer-specific mortality (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.26-8.14, P = 0.01). This association remained statistically significant when the analysis was limited to newly diagnosed incidental findings. Among patients with incidental findings, follow-up radiographic studies were conducted in 87%, and invasive procedures performed in 32%. Physician office-based follow-up of these findings occurred in 42% of patients and incidental finding-related hospitalization occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that incidental findings are common and were associated with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality but only the later remained statistically significant after multivariable adjustment.
BACKGROUND: Attenuation corrected computed tomography (CTAC) is often performed to improve the specificity of single-photon emission tomography imaging. Extracardiac incidental findings are frequently observed. It is unclear whether these findings have any prognostic value. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 1139) at a tertiary care center were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings on CTAC. Clinically significant incidental findings were defined as findings warranting physician follow-up. Information regarding subsequent resource utilization was obtained by chart review. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for demographic and clinical variables was used to evaluate association of these incidental findings with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 135 (12%) patients with incidental findings were identified, 83 of whom (68%) were newly diagnosed. Lung nodules were the most common finding, present in 92 (68%) patients. Over a median follow-up of 468 days, incidental findings were not significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.77-2.33, P = 0.29) but was significantly associated with cancer-specific mortality (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.26-8.14, P = 0.01). This association remained statistically significant when the analysis was limited to newly diagnosed incidental findings. Among patients with incidental findings, follow-up radiographic studies were conducted in 87%, and invasive procedures performed in 32%. Physician office-based follow-up of these findings occurred in 42% of patients and incidental finding-related hospitalization occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that incidental findings are common and were associated with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality but only the later remained statistically significant after multivariable adjustment.
Authors: Gary V Heller; Jonathan Links; Timothy M Bateman; Jack A Ziffer; Edward Ficaro; Mylan C Cohen; Robert C Hendel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Lars Husmann; Fuminari Tatsugami; Ursina Aepli; Bernhard A Herzog; Ines Valenta; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Ronny R Buechel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jimmy Machaalany; Yeung Yam; Terrence D Ruddy; Arun Abraham; Li Chen; Rob S Beanlands; Benjamin J W Chow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexander Goehler; Pamela M McMahon; Heidi S Lumish; Carol C Wu; Vidit Munshi; Michael Gilmore; Jonathan H Chung; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Daniel Mark; Quynh A Truong; G Scott Gazelle; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 3.872