Literature DB >> 25015342

Cost-effectiveness of follow-up of pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on cardiac computed tomographic angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Alexander Goehler1, Pamela M McMahon2, Heidi S Lumish2, Carol C Wu2, Vidit Munshi2, Michael Gilmore2, Jonathan H Chung2, Brian B Ghoshhajra2, Daniel Mark2, Quynh A Truong2, G Scott Gazelle2, Udo Hoffmann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary nodules (PNs) are often detected incidentally during coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography, which is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with chest pain symptoms. However, the efficiency of following up on incidentally detected PN is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We determined demographic and clinical characteristics of stable symptomatic patients referred for coronary CT angiography in whom incidentally detected PNs warranted follow-up. A validated lung cancer simulation model was populated with data from these patients, and clinical and economic consequences of follow-up per Fleischner guidelines versus no follow-up were simulated. Of the 3665 patients referred for coronary CT angiography, 591 (16%) had PNs requiring follow-up. The mean age of patients with PNs was 59±10 years; 66% were male; 67% had ever smoked; and 21% had obstructive coronary artery disease. The projected overall lung cancer incidence was 5.8% in these patients, but the majority died of coronary artery disease (38%) and other causes (57%). Follow-up of PNs was associated with a 4.6% relative reduction in cumulative lung cancer mortality (absolute mortality: follow-up, 4.33% versus non-follow-up, 4.54%), more downstream testing (follow-up, 2.34 CTs per patient versus non-follow-up, 1.01 CTs per patient), and an average increase in quality-adjusted life of 7 days. Costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained were $154 700 to follow up the entire cohort and $129 800 per quality-adjusted life-year when only smokers were included.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up of PNs incidentally detected in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography for chest pain evaluation is associated with a small reduction in lung cancer mortality. However, significant downstream testing contributes to limited efficiency, as demonstrated by a high cost per quality-adjusted life-year, especially in nonsmokers.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness research; computer simulation; coronary artery disease; cost-benefit analysis; health policy; pulmonary nodules, solitary; tomography, x-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25015342      PMCID: PMC4139449          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

1.  Extracardiac findings on coronary CT angiograms: Limited versus complete image review.

Authors:  Kevin M Johnson; Jolanta M Dennis; David A Dowe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Myrna C B Godoy; David P Naidich
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Comparison of three measurements on computed tomography for the prediction of less invasiveness in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Haruhisa Matsuguma; Izumi Oki; Rie Nakahara; Haruko Suzuki; Takashi Kasai; Yukari Kamiyama; Seiji Igarashi; Kiyoshi Mori; Shunsuke Endo; Kohei Yokoi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Microsimulation model predicts survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy versus radiotherapy for treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Chung Yin Kong; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Michael Lanuti; G Scott Gazelle; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; Kevin ten Haaf; Chung Yin Kong; Ayca Erdogan; William C Black; Martin C Tammemagi; Sung Eun Choi; Jihyoun Jeon; Summer S Han; Vidit Munshi; Joost van Rosmalen; Paul Pinsky; Pamela M McMahon; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer; William D Hazelton; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Chapter 2: Birth-cohort-specific estimates of smoking behaviors for the U.S. population.

Authors:  Christy M Anderson; David M Burns; Kevin W Dodd; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Chapter 9: The MGH-HMS lung cancer policy model: tobacco control versus screening.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Chung Yin Kong; Bruce E Johnson; Milton C Weinstein; Jane C Weeks; Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Colleen Bouzan; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong; David A Schoenfeld; Eric T Chou; Pamela K Woodard; John T Nagurney; J Hector Pope; Thomas H Hauser; Charles S White; Scott G Weiner; Shant Kalanjian; Michael E Mullins; Issam Mikati; W Frank Peacock; Pearl Zakroysky; Douglas Hayden; Alexander Goehler; Hang Lee; G Scott Gazelle; Stephen D Wiviott; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Persistent pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules ≥ 10 mm in diameter at CT scan: histopathologic comparisons and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Hyun-Ju Lim; Soomin Ahn; Kyung Soo Lee; Joungho Han; Young Mog Shim; Sookyoung Woo; Jae-Hun Kim; Miyeon Yie; Ho Yun Lee; Chin A Yi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; Kevin ten Haaf; Vidit N Munshi; Jihyoun Jeon; Saadet Ayca Erdogan; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Sung Eun Choi; Paul F Pinsky; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Martin C Tammemägi; William D Hazelton; Eric J Feuer; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prognostic value of extracardiac incidental findings on attenuation correction cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Waqas T Qureshi; Zaid Alirhayim; Fatima Khalid; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The good, bad, and ugly of incidental findings on cardiovascular-computed tomography.

Authors:  Pradeep Bhambhvani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prevalence and variability in reporting of clinically actionable incidental findings on attenuation-correction CT scans in a veteran population.

Authors:  B Julie He; Brian J Malm; Michelle Carino; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Safety of coronary CT angiography and functional testing for stable chest pain in the PROMISE trial: A randomized comparison of test complications, incidental findings, and radiation dose.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Pamela S Douglas; James E Udelson; Elizabeth Adami; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Michael H Picard; Rhonda Roberts; Kerry L Lee; Andrew J Einstein; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez; William Carter; Michael Ridner; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 5.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of chest pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  High pitch third generation dual-source CT: Coronary and cardiac visualization on routine chest CT.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Mark A Ahlman; Elizabeth C Jones; Mariana Selwaness; Marcus Y Chen; Les R Folio; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-04-20

7.  Incidental pulmonary nodules in emergent coronary CT angiography for suspected acute coronary syndrome: Impact of revised 2017 Fleischner Society Guidelines.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Scholtz; Michael T Lu; Sandeep Hedgire; Nina M Meyersohn; George R Oliveira; Anand M Prabhakar; Rajiv Gupta; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-11-14

8.  Relationship of soluble ST2 to pulmonary hypertension severity in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Beaudoin; Jackie Szymonifka; Zachary Lavender; Roderick C Deaño; Qing Zhou; James L Januzzi; Jagmeet P Singh; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Conventional Computed Tomographic Calcium Scoring vs full chest CTCS for lung cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Boxiang Jiang; Philip A Linden; Amit Gupta; Craig Jarrett; Stephanie G Worrell; Vanessa P Ho; Yaron Perry; Christopher W Towe
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 10.  Incidental Non-cardiac Findings in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Mark T Macmillan; Michelle C Williams
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.