Literature DB >> 22487045

How can a Bayesian approach inform neuroscience?

Jill X O'Reilly1, Saad Jbabdi, Timothy E J Behrens.   

Abstract

In this review we consider how Bayesian logic can help neuroscientists to understand behaviour and brain function. Firstly, we review some key characteristics of Bayesian systems - they integrate information making rational use of uncertainty, they apply prior knowledge in the interpretation of new observations, and (for several reasons) they are very effective learners. Secondly, we illustrate how some well-known psychological phenomena including visual illusions, categorical perception and attention can be understood in terms of Bayesian inference. We also consider how formal models can clarify our understanding of psychological constructs, by giving a truly computational definition of psychological processes. Finally, we consider how probabilistic representations and hence Bayesian algorithms could be implemented by neural populations. In particular, we explore how different types of population coding may lead to different predictions about activity in both single-unit and imaging studies, and draw a distinction in this context between the representation of parameters and implementation of computations.
© 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487045     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  28 in total

1.  Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance.

Authors:  Nikos Gekas; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The neural underpinnings of cross-cultural differences in creativity.

Authors:  Tal Ivancovsky; Oded Kleinmintz; Joo Lee; Jenny Kurman; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modules or Mean-Fields?

Authors:  Thomas Parr; Noor Sajid; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Learned rather than online relative weighting of visual-proprioceptive sensory cues.

Authors:  Laura Mikula; Valérie Gaveau; Laure Pisella; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Value normalization in decision making: theory and evidence.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; John A Clithero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Scaling prediction errors to reward variability benefits error-driven learning in humans.

Authors:  Kelly M J Diederen; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  When kinesthesia becomes visual: a theoretical justification for executing motor tasks in visual space.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Learning what to expect (in visual perception).

Authors:  Peggy Seriès; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Population Code Dynamics in Categorical Perception.

Authors:  Chihiro I Tajima; Satohiro Tajima; Kowa Koida; Hidehiko Komatsu; Kazuyuki Aihara; Hideyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Unifying Probabilistic View of Associative Learning.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.