Literature DB >> 26200407

Evaluation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, opening wedge, and dome-type high tibial osteotomies for knee arthritis.

İbrahim Tuncay1, Kerem Bilsel1, Mehmet Elmadağ1, Ömer Faruk Erkoçak2, Murat Aşçı3, Cengiz Şen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Three methods of surgery used in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) are mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Oxford UKA), opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and dome-type HTO. This article aimed to retrospectively compare these three methods in terms of outcomes for health status, patient satisfaction, and function.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2010, 255 knees of 235 patients underwent operations for medial knee OA. Three types of surgery were performed. Group 1 consisted of 109 knees of 94 patients who underwent Oxford UKA. Group 2 was made up of 36 knees of 36 patients who underwent HTO using circular external fixation, and Group 3 comprised 57 knees of 52 patients on whom opening wedge type HTO using locking plate fixation was performed. SF-36 and HSS knee scores were used to compare the functional outcomes among groups.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the preoperative and postoperative measures in all 3 of the treatment groups for physical function, physical role, pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role, and mental health according to SF-36 and HSS scores. In the 2nd group, the average correction of the mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 38 mm with 11.7º along the femorotibial axis and 6.2º along the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). In the 3rd group, the average correction in the MAD was 28 mm with 9.7º along the femorotibial axis and 5.6º along the MPTA. All 3 of the treatment alternatives were observed to be sufficient. Satisfactory postoperative results were achieved in the UKA group in terms of social function and mental health, and the patients were able to achieve early rehabilitation and return to their previous life activities.
CONCLUSION: UKA is the ideal option for patients who wish for the earliest possible return to social and recreational activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200407     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  9 in total

1.  Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Won-Joon Cho; Jong-Min Kim; Won-Kyeong Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Nam-Ki Kim; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  High tibial osteotomy with an external fixator or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for varus knee in young patients?

Authors:  Amit Kumar Yadav; Mangal Parihar; Ilaria Mariani; Riccardo Giorgino; Laura Mangiavini; Nicola Ursino; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Nimish Seth; Damien Gibson; Anish Rastogi; Kirk Lower; Aaron Rodwell; Warwick Bruce
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of high tibial osteotomy with combined fixator-assisted nailing and subtubercle tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Levent Bayam; Mehmet Erdem; Deniz Gülabi; Ahmet Can Erdem; Ahmet Çağrı Uyar; Alauddin Kochai
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review.

Authors:  Marcel Budhi Santoso; Lidong Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hangyu Ping; Jiaxin Wen; Yubo Liu; Haifeng Li; Xin Wang; Xiangpeng Kong; Wei Chai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  Better clinical outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty when comparing with high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Seung-Beom Han; Hee-Soo Kyung; In-Wook Seo; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Short-term outcomes of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with coronal subluxation of the knee: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Gang Xi; Hao-Hao Wang; Hao Li; Min Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.