Literature DB >> 30719541

Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics.

Sang Jun Song1, Dae Kyung Bae2, Kang Il Kim1, Cheol Hee Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival rates were compared between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTOs) and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with similar demographics.
METHODS: Sixty HTOs and 50 UKAs completed between 1992 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. There were no significant differences in pre-operative demographics. The mean follow-up period was 10.7 ± 5.7 years for HTO and 12.0 ± 7.1 years for UKA (n.s.). The Knee Society knee and function scores, WOMAC, and range of motion (ROM) were investigated. The mechanical axis and femorotibial angle were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed (failure: revision to TKA) and the failure modes were investigated.
RESULTS: Most of the clinical and radiographic results were not different at the last follow-up, except ROM; ROM was 135.3° ± 12.3° in HTO and 126.8° ± 13.3° in UKA (p = 0.005). The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival rates were 100%, 91.0%, 63.4%, and 48.3% for closed-wedge HTO, respectively, and 90.5%, 87.1%, 70.8%, and 66.4% for UKA (n.s.). The survival rate was higher than that for UKA until 12 years post-operatively but was higher in UKAs thereafter, following a remarkable decrease in HTO. The most common failure mode was degenerative osteoarthritic progression of medial compartment in HTO and femoral component loosening in UKA.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival did not differ significantly between closed-wedge HTO and fixed-bearing UKA in patients with similar pre-operative demographics and knee conditions. The difference in post-operative ROM and failure mode should be considered when selecting a procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee; Osteoarthritis; Osteotomy; Survival; Unicompartmental arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30719541     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05390-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A Gulati; R Chau; D J Simpson; C A F Dodd; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique.

Authors:  D K Bae; S J Song; K H Yoon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-09

6.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis using minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Sandeep Biswal; Roger W Brighton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component?

Authors:  Jorrit Zelle; Dennis Janssen; Jolanda Van Eijden; Maarten De Waal Malefijt; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study.

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman; C J Wirth; D Lazovic; A Wefer
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A mid term comparison of open wedge high tibial osteotomy vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Ryohei Takeuchi; Yusuke Umemoto; Masato Aratake; Haruhiko Bito; Izumi Saito; Ken Kumagai; Yohei Sasaki; Yasushi Akamatsu; Hiroyuki Ishikawa; Tomihisa Koshino; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  High tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Dong Chul Lee; Seong Joon Byun
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-31
View more
  8 in total

1.  Mobile bearing versus fixed bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement: an independent two center matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Hariri; Georg Hauer; Maria Smolle; Patrick Sadoghi; Andreas Leithner; Benjamin Panzram; Christian Merle; Tobias Renkawitz; Tilman Walker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Risk of Revision and Adverse Outcomes Following Partial Knee Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Hae-Rim Kim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  A Novel Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Formation After Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Kyota Ishibashi; Eiji Sasaki; Edward Wijaya; Shohei Yamauchi; Shizuka Sasaki; Yuka Kimura; Yuji Yamamoto; Takashi Shimbo; Katsuto Tamai; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  [Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dong Wu; Minzhi Yang; Zheng Cao; Xiangpeng Kong; Yi Wang; Renwen Guo; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

5.  Long-Term Survivorship of Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: Outcomes After 10 to 37 Years.

Authors:  Shinya Ishizuka; Hideki Hiraiwa; Satoshi Yamashita; Hiroki Oba; Yusuke Kawamura; Takefumi Sakaguchi; Masaru Idota; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-20

6.  A comparative study of 21,194 UKAs and 49,270 HTOs for the risk of unanticipated events in mid-age patients from the national claims data in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Hae-Rim Kim; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hangyu Ping; Jiaxin Wen; Yubo Liu; Haifeng Li; Xin Wang; Xiangpeng Kong; Wei Chai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  Return to sports activity after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients aged 70 years and older.

Authors:  Akio Otoshi; Ken Kumagai; Shunsuke Yamada; Shuntaro Nejima; Takahiro Fujisawa; Kazuma Miyatake; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.