Literature DB >> 29569140

Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis.

Won-Joon Cho1, Jong-Min Kim2, Won-Kyeong Kim3, Dong-Eun Kim4, Nam-Ki Kim5, Seong-Il Bin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: Patients with advanced medial compartment OA (Ahlbäck grade ≥ II) who underwent either MB-UKA with Oxford Knee or OWHTO were included. The minimum follow-up was two years. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, knee score (KS), and function score (FS) of the Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Pre-operative and post-operative values were compared within groups. Pre-operative and post-operative values and the degree of change were compared between the two groups. Radiologic progression of OA in either the lateral or patellofemoral compartment was evaluated.
RESULTS: Forty knees (20 received MB-UKA, 20 received OWHTO) were enrolled. The mean age was higher in the MB-UKA group (67.9 ± 9.0 years) than in the OWHTO group (58.4 ± 5.5 years). The HSS score, KS, and FS were significantly increased post-operatively in both groups. The preoperative HSS score, KS, and FS were significantly lower in the MB-UKA than in the OWHTO group; however, only the post-operative HSS score was significantly higher in the MB-UKA group. The changes in HSS score and KS were also greater in the MB-UKA group. There was no significant difference in OA progression.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an age difference between the two groups, MB-UKA demonstrated superior short-term clinical outcomes to OWHTO for advanced isolated medial OA. In particular, MB-UKA was more effective in terms of pain relief.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis; Clinical outcomes; Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29569140     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3880-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings.

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Hagen Schmal; Oliver Hauschild; Johanna von Heyden; Norbert P Südkamp; Wolfgang Köstler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

3.  Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique.

Authors:  R W Brouwer; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; A J van Koeveringe; J A N Verhaar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

4.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; K Barker; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

5.  The influence of open and closed high tibial osteotomy on dynamic patellar tracking: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Robert Gaasbeek; Roy Welsing; Marco Barink; Nico Verdonschot; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Todd Borus; Thomas Thornhill
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Gerrit Bode; Johanna von Heyden; Jan Pestka; Hagen Schmal; Gian Salzmann; Norbert Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; Y Ooishi; T Shimizu; H Sugiura; S Takahashi; H Ito; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: no difference in progression of patellofemoral joint arthritis.

Authors:  Kwang-Jun Oh; Young Chan Kim; Jong Seong Lee; Yong Suk Chang; Gautam M Shetty; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) versus mobile bearing unicondylar medial joint replacement: five years results.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Sebastian Metzlaff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  9 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Sueen Sohn; Ji Hwan Jeong; Yong In
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The forgotten joint score in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Jeroen Verhaegen; Barbara Favier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comment on Cho et al.: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Wanchun Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The patient results and satisfaction of knee arthroplasty in a validated grading system.

Authors:  Christiaan Rudolf Oosthuizen; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Innocent Maposa; Christian Hugo Snyckers; Duwayne Peter Vermaak; Sebastian Magobotha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Safety of simultaneous versus staged bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with locked plate and immediate weight bearing.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; David Giber; Arnaud Dubory; Jean Charles Auregan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A comparative study of 21,194 UKAs and 49,270 HTOs for the risk of unanticipated events in mid-age patients from the national claims data in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Hae-Rim Kim; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hangyu Ping; Jiaxin Wen; Yubo Liu; Haifeng Li; Xin Wang; Xiangpeng Kong; Wei Chai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.677

9.  Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol.

Authors:  Yongqiang Yin; Xu Zhang; Kaiming Zhang; Xiang He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.