Literature DB >> 26199034

[Dwyer osteotomy : Lateral sliding osteotomy of calcaneus].

A Barg1, H Hörterer, M Jacxsens, M Wiewiorski, J Paul, V Valderrabano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To correct the underlying inframalleolar varus deformity and to restore physiologic biomechanics of the hindfoot. INDICATIONS: Neurologic, posttraumatic, congenital, and idiopathic cavovarus deformity. In patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis with varus heel malposition as additional single-stage procedure complementing total ankle replacement. Severe peroneal tendinopathy with concomitant cavovarus deformity. CONTRAINDICATIONS: General surgical or anesthesiological risks, infections, critical soft tissue conditions, nonmanageable hindfoot instability, neurovascular impairment of the lower extremity, neuroarthropathy (e. g., Charcot arthropathy), end-stage osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint, severely reduced bone quality, high age, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, smoking. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The lateral calcaneus cortex is exposed using a lateral incision. The osteotomy is performed through an oscillating saw. The posterior osteotomy fragment is manually mobilized and shifted laterally. If needed, a laterally based wedge can be removed and/or the osteotomy fragment can be translated cranially. The osteotomy is stabilized with two cannulated screws, followed by wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A soft wound dressing is used. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended. Patient mobilization starts on postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot or cast for 6 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated step by step.
RESULTS: Between January 2009 and June 2013, a Dwyer osteotomy was performed in 31 patients with a mean age of 45.7 ± 16.3 years (range 21.5-77.4 years). All patients had a substantial inframalleolar cavovarus deformity with preoperative moment arm of the calcaneus of -17.9 ± 3.3 mm (range -22.5 to -10.5 mm), which has been improved significantly to 1.6 ± 5.9 mm (range -16.9 to 9.9 mm). Significant pain relief from 6.3 ± 1.9 (range 4-10) to 1.1 ± 1.1 (range 0-4) using the visual analogue scale was observed. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score significantly improved from 33.1 ± 14.2 (range 10-60) to 78.0 ± 10.5 (range 55-95).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26199034     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-015-0409-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  48 in total

1.  Insert position in three-component total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Andreas Elsner; Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Medial distal tibial angle: comparison between weightbearing mortise view and hindfoot alignment view.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Michael D Harris; Heath B Henninger; Richard L Amendola; Charles L Saltzman; Beat Hintermann; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 3.  Total ankle replacement using HINTEGRA, an unconstrained, three-component system: surgical technique and pitfalls.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Markus Knupp; Heath B Henninger; Lukas Zwicky; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.653

4.  Cavovarus foot treated with combined calcaneus and metatarsal osteotomies.

Authors:  G J Sammarco; R Taylor
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Medial calcaneal osteotomy for relapsed equinovarus deformity. Long-term study of the results of Frederick Dwyer.

Authors:  P N Kumar; P W Laing; L Klenerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-11

6.  A simple test for hindfoot flexibility in the cavovarus foot.

Authors:  S S Coleman; W J Chesnut
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  What is the role and limit of calcaneal osteotomy in the cavovarus foot?

Authors:  Jason T Bariteau; Brad D Blankenhorn; Josef N Tofte; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 8.  Pediatric issues with cavovarus foot deformities.

Authors:  Mark C Lee; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 9.  Foot and ankle manifestations of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  J R Holmes; S T Hansen
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1993-10

10.  [Osteotomies in varus malalignment of the ankle].

Authors:  Markus Knupp; Geert Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.154

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Percutaneous calcaneal sliding osteotomy].

Authors:  M Walther; S Kriegelstein; S Altenberger; A Röser
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement : Two-stage revision with bone augmentation of osseous defects and secondary prosthesis implantation].

Authors:  A Barg; M Wiewiorski; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement : One-stage revision ankle arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Pagenstert; M D Wimmer; M Jacxsens; C L Saltzman; A Barg
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  [Triple arthrodesis for correction of cavovarus deformity].

Authors:  A Barg; R Ruiz; B Hintermann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  [Components of the joint-sparing, combined bony and soft tissue correction of the cavovarus foot].

Authors:  A Wallroth; T Dreher
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Radiological outcome after treatment of juvenile flatfeet with subtalar arthroereisis: a matched pair analysis of 38 cases comparing neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients.

Authors:  H Kubo; R Krauspe; M Hufeland; C Lipp; M Ruppert; B Westhoff; H Pilge
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.