Literature DB >> 28497248

[Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement : One-stage revision ankle arthroplasty].

G Pagenstert1, M D Wimmer2, M Jacxsens1,3, C L Saltzman4, A Barg5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To revise one or both loosened prosthesis components, to achieve postoperative pain relief, and preserve ankle range of motion. INDICATIONS: Aseptic loosening of the tibial and/or talar ankle prosthesis components without substantial bone defect of the tibial or talar bone stock. CONTRAINDICATIONS: General surgical or anesthesiological risks, infections, critical soft tissue conditions, nonmanageable hindfoot instability, neurovascular impairment of the lower extremity, neuroarthropathy (e. g. Charcot arthropathy), substantial nonreconstructable osseous defects with or without cysts on the tibial and/or talar side, non-compliance, patients with primary total ankle replacement (TAR) using intramedullary fixation (stem fixation), patients with severely reduced bone quality, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, smoking, unrealistic patient expectations, patients with high activity in sports. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the ankle joint using the previous incision (anterior or lateral transfibular approach). Mobilization and removal of loosened prosthesis component. Careful debridement of bone stock at bone-prosthesis interface. Determination of prosthesis component size. Implantation of definitive prosthesis components. Wound closure in layers. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A soft wound dressing is used. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended. Patient mobilization starts at postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot or cast for 6 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated gradually.
RESULTS: Between January 2007 and December 2012 a one-stage revision TAR was performed in 14 patients with a mean age of 52.7 ± 12.0 years (29.8-70.5 years). The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening of one or both prosthesis components. The mean time between the initial TAR and revision surgery was 5.9 ± 2.9 years (2.0-11.5 years). In 2 patients a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was performed due to painful aseptic loosening of revision TAR. In all patients a significant pain relief was observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrodesis; Articulatio talocruralis; Prosthesis failure; Surgical revision; Total ankle replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497248     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-017-0497-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  34 in total

Review 1.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.653

2.  Insert position in three-component total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Andreas Elsner; Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography.

Authors:  Robin S Hanna; Steven L Haddad; Martin L Lazarus
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 4.  Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.

Authors:  G Labek; M Thaler; W Janda; M Agreiter; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  Agility to INBONE: anterior and posterior approaches to the difficult revision total ankle replacement.

Authors:  J George DeVries; Ryan T Scott; Gregory C Berlet; Christopher F Hyer; Thomas H Lee; James K DeOrio
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.231

Review 6.  Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Michael Liebensteiner; Mark Agreiter; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Single-stage supramalleolar osteotomy for coronal plane deformity.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  Medial ankle instability.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.653

9.  [Osteotomies in varus malalignment of the ankle].

Authors:  Markus Knupp; Geert Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 10.  The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Zaidi; S Cro; K Gurusamy; N Siva; A Macgregor; A Henricson; A Goldberg
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Buchhorn; S F Baumbach; W Böcker; D Szymski; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.