Literature DB >> 28534175

[Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement : Two-stage revision with bone augmentation of osseous defects and secondary prosthesis implantation].

A Barg1,2, M Wiewiorski3, V Valderrabano4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To remove loosened ankle prosthesis components, perform osseous defect augmentation, and reimplant definitive prosthesis components to preserve ankle range of motion. INDICATIONS: Aseptic loosening of the tibial and/or talar ankle prosthesis components with substantial bone defect. CONTRAINDICATIONS: General surgical/anesthesiological risks, infections, critical soft tissue conditions, nonmanageable hindfoot instability, neurovascular impairment of the lower extremity, neuroarthropathy, substantial nonreconstructable osseous defects with or without cysts on the tibial and/or talar side, noncompliance, primary total ankle replacement (TAR) using intramedullary fixation (stem fixation), severely reduced bone quality, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, smoking, unrealistic patients' expectations, high activity in sports. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the ankle joint using the previous incision. Mobilization and removal of loosened prosthesis components. Debridement of bone stock. Assessment and measurement of osseous defects. Harvesting of iliac crest autograft. Screw fixation of iliac crest autograft. Placement of polyethylene inlay as a spacer. Wound closure in layers at the ankle and the iliac crest. Implantation of definitive prosthesis components. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A soft wound dressing. Thromboprophylaxis recommended. Mobilization on postoperative day 1 using a stabilizing walking boot/cast for 6 weeks (sole contact but no weight bearing). Clinical and radiographic follow-up 3 months postoperatively including computed tomography to assess osseous consolidation. After the second surgery, patient mobilization on postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot/cast for 6 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated gradually.
RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2012, a two-stage revision TAR was performed in 5 patients (46.8 and 71.4 years). The time between the initial TAR and revision was 2.4-11.5 years. No intra-/perioperative complications. Substantial pain relief in all patients. Comparable preoperative and postoperative ankle range of motion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle joint; Grafting bone; Prosthesis loosening; Reimplantation; Revision surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28534175     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-017-0500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  42 in total

1.  Insert position in three-component total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Andreas Elsner; Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography.

Authors:  Robin S Hanna; Steven L Haddad; Martin L Lazarus
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft for salvage of large defects in the ankle.

Authors:  Clifford L Jeng; John T Campbell; Edward Y Tang; Rebecca A Cerrato; Mark S Myerson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 4.  Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.

Authors:  G Labek; M Thaler; W Janda; M Agreiter; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Michael Liebensteiner; Mark Agreiter; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Through a Posterior Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach.

Authors:  Manuel J Pellegrini; Adam P Schiff; Samuel B Adams; James K DeOrio; Mark E Easley; James A Nunley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 7.  Medial ankle instability.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.653

8.  The treatment and outcome of peri-prosthetic infection of the ankle: a single cohort-centre experience of 34 cases.

Authors:  B Kessler; M Knupp; P Graber; L Zwicky; B Hintermann; W Zimmerli; P Sendi
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  [Osteotomies in varus malalignment of the ankle].

Authors:  Markus Knupp; Geert Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 10.  The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Zaidi; S Cro; K Gurusamy; N Siva; A Macgregor; A Henricson; A Goldberg
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Buchhorn; S F Baumbach; W Böcker; D Szymski; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.