| Literature DB >> 26198227 |
Camila Agnes Lumi Abe1, Carla Bertechini Faria2, Fausto Fernandes de Castro3, Sandra Regina de Souza4, Fabiane Cristina dos Santos5, Cleiltan Novais da Silva6, Dauri José Tessmann7, Ione Parra Barbosa-Tessmann8.
Abstract
Filamentous fungi produce a great variety of enzymes, and research on their biotechnological potential has recently intensified. The objective of this work was to identify, at the species level, using DNA barcoding, 46 fungal isolates obtained from maize grains with rot symptoms. We also analyzed the production of extracellular amylases, cellulases, proteases and lipases of 33 of those fungal isolates. The enzymatic activities were evaluated by the formation of a clear halo or a white precipitate around the colonies in defined substrate media. The found fungi belong to the genera Talaromyces, Stenocarpella, Penicillium, Phlebiopsis, Cladosporium, Hyphopichia, Epicoccum, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Irpex, Fusarium, Microdochium, Mucor and Sarocladium. In the genus Fusarium, the species Fusarium verticillioides was predominant and this genus presented the highest diversity, followed by the genera Aspergillus. The best genera for lipase production were Cladosporium and Penicillium; while Cladosporium, Aspergillus and Penicillium were best for cellulase activity; Hyphopichia, Aspergillus and Irpex for amylase activity; and Cladosporium and Sarocladium for proteases activity. In conclusion, a collection of fungi from maize seeds presenting rotten symptoms were obtained, among which exist important producers of hydrolases.Entities:
Keywords: amylase; cellulase; corn; fungi; lipase; protease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26198227 PMCID: PMC4519902 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160715328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Fungal isolates and molecular identification.
| Genera and Species | Isolate | Geographic Origin (City, State) | GenBank Accession Number | GenBank or Fusarium-ID (FD) Accession Number of Similar Sequences (Percentage of Identity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG 24 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691048 | KP036603.1 (100%), KM486551.1 (100%) | |
| BAN 12 | Bandeirantes, PR | - | # | |
| MGA 20 | Maringá, PR | - | # | |
| PG 18 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691043 | KM409566.1 (100%), AY373884.1 (100%) | |
| CMA 15 | Clementina, SP | KP691040 | KJ589558.1 (100%), KF986546.1 (100%) | |
| CMA 07 | Clementina, SP | KP691034 | KJ589558.1 (100%), JX406506.1 (100%) | |
| MGI 04 | Mandaguari, PR | - | # | |
| PG 16 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691041 | JX844158.1 (100%), KJ934366.1 (99%) | |
| PG 23 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691047 | KF990155.1 (99%), KC005662.1 (99%) | |
| CMA 14 | Clementina, SP | KP691039 | JX844158.1 (100%), KJ934366.1 (99%) | |
| CO 11 | Cruzeiro do Oeste, PR | KP691037 | KM111488.1 (100%), KP050561.1 (99%) | |
| RV 18-1 | Rio Verde, GO | KP336404 | KF962948.1 (97%), FD_01623 (97.5%) | |
| CMA 1-2 | Clementina, SP | KP336405 | KF962948.1 (97%), FD_01623 (97.5%) | |
| CMA 5-1 | Clementina, SP | KP336406 | KF962948.1 (97%), FD_01623 (97.5%) | |
| RV 23-2 | Rio Verde, GO | KP336408 | JX867945.1 (100%), KC964122.1 (98%) | |
| PG 1-2 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP336409 | KC964122.1 (99%), JF270302.1 (99%), | |
| CMA 3-1 | Clementina, SP | KP691051 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| RV 8-1 | Rio Verde, GO | KP691052 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| BAN 4-2 | Bandeirantes, PR | KP691053 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| MGI 1-1 | Mandaguari, PR | KP691054 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| BAN 2-2 | Bandeirantes, PR | KP691055 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| MGA 5-1 | Maringá, PR | KP691056 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| RV 12-2 | Rio Verde, GO | KP691057 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| MGA 2-2 | Maringá, PR | KP691058 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| CMA 2-1 | Clementina, SP | KP691059 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| CPÃ 1-1 | Camapuã, MS | KP691060 | KJ125822.1 (100%), KJ125764.1 (100%) | |
| MGI 3-2 | Mandaguari, PR | KP336410 | KF715263.1 (100%), KC599244.1 (99%) | |
| RV 12-2 | Rio Verde, GO | KP336411 | KF715263.1 (100%), KC599244.1 (99%) | |
| PG 4-1 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP336412 | KF715263.1 (100%), KC599244.1 (99%) | |
| RV 27-1 | Rio Verde, GO | KP336407 | JX974611.1 (99%), KC954401.1 (98%) | |
| MGI 21 | Mandaguari, PR | KP691045 | KM513614.1 (100%), KF624778.1 (100%) | |
| RV 27-2 | Rio Verde, GO | KP336403 | JF740790.1 (95%), HM243236.1 (95%) | |
| CMA 09 | Clementina, SP | KP691036 | KP132302.1 (99%), EU714323.1 (98%) | |
| CMA 19 | Clementina, SP | KP691044 | LN714557.1 (100%), KJ831879.1 (100%) | |
| PG 22 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691046 | JX280606.1 (98%), EF187912.1 (92%), | |
| CMA 25 | Clementina, SP | KP691049 | JQ972063.1 (99%), FN650655.1 (99%) | |
| CO 10 | Cruzeiro do Oeste, PR | - | # | |
| RV 06 | Rio Verde, GO | KP691033 | AY373910.1 (100%), KJ834506.1 (100%) | |
| MGI 01 | Mandaguari, PR | - | # | |
| CMA 08 | Clementina, SP | KP691035 | JQ781838.1 (98%), FJ791151.1 (98%) | |
| PG 1-1 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691050 | KP132614.1 (100%), KJ188657.1 (98%) | |
| MGI 03 | Mandaguari, PR | KP691031 | KM030331.1 (100%), KC311732.1 (100%) | |
| MGI 05 | Mandaguari, PR | KP691032 | JX157861.1 (99%), JQ422620.1 (99%) | |
| PG 17 | Ponta Grossa, PR | KP691042 | JX157861.1 (99%), JQ422620.1 (99%) | |
| MGI 02 | Mandaguari, PR | KP691030 | JX157861.1 (99%), JQ422620.1 (99%) | |
| CO 13 | Cruzeiro do Oeste, PR | KP691038 | KP050785.1 (100%), KF624792.1 (100%) |
* TEF1α sequence; # Isolates MGI 1, MGI 04, CO 10, Ban 12 and MGA 20 were only morphologically identified. GO—Goiás; MS—Mato Grosso do Sul; PR—Paraná; SP—São Paulo.
Figure 1The evolutionary history of the rDNA (A) and TEF1α (B) sequences. The optimal trees with the sum of branch length = 2.85730321 for rDNA and 0.36769626 for TEF1α are shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [26]. Bootstrap values lower than 50% are not shown. The trees are drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The analysis involved 31 nucleotide sequences for rDNA and 10 sequences for TEF1α. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. There were a total of 491 positions for rDNA and 645 for TEF1α in the final dataset. In (A) the F. verticillioides and E. nigrum branches are magnified. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [27].
Figure 2Petri dishes with defined substrate media for detection of the enzyme activities. (A) Amylolytic activity. Nutrient agar containing soluble starch. A. wentii-PG 18; (B) Cellulolytic activity. Medium containing microcrystalline cellulose. P. digitatum-RV 06; (C) Proteolytic activity. Medium containing milk casein. C. cladosporioides-CMA 15; (D) Lipolytic activity. Medium containing Tween 20 and CaCl2. E. nigrum-PG 16.
Enzymatic Index of hydrolytic enzymes production by fungi isolated from maize with rot symptoms.
| Fungal Strain | Strain | Amylase * | Cellulase * | Protease * | Lipase * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG 24 | 1.24 ± 0.08 b | 1.78 ± 0.03 b | 1.17 ± 0.01 b | 1.24 ± 0.04 f | |
| PG 18 | 3.33 ± 0.49 a | 3.92 ± 0.51 a | - | 3.01 ± 0.20 c | |
| BAN 12 | 1.04 ± 0.00 b | 1.84 ± 0.81 b | - | 1.15 ± 0.06 f | |
| MGA 20 | 1.31 ± 0.04 b | 1.57 ± 0.04 b | - | 1.82 ± 0.08 e | |
| CMA 07 | - | 4.47 ± 0.50 a | 2.27 ± 0.31 a | 5.60 ± 0.69 a | |
| CMA 15 | 2.20 ± 0.40 b | 4.13 ± 0.50 a | 2.33 ± 0.31 a | 5.67 ± 0.31 a | |
| MGI 04 | 1.04 ± 0.00 b | 1.36 ± 0.04 b | 1.29 ± 0.03 b | - | |
| CMA 14 | 1.46 ± 0.08 b | 1.62 ± 0.16 b | 1.31 ± 0.06 b | 1.77 ± 0.18 e | |
| PG 16 | 2.25 ± 0.00 b | 2.40 ± 0.36 b | 1.69 ± 0.63 b | 2.97 ± 0.69 c | |
| PG 23 | 1.92 ± 0.62 b | 1.67 ± 0.11 b | 1.09 ± 0.00 b | 2.21 ± 0.29 d | |
| CO 11 | 1.18 ± 0.03 b | 1.85 ± 0.08 b | 1.04 ± 0.04 b | 1.84 ± 0.28 e | |
| RV 27-1 | - | - | - | - | |
| MGI 21 | - | - | - | - | |
| RV 18-1 | - | - | - | 2.00 ± 0.00 d | |
| CMA 1-2 | - | - | - | 2.14 ± 0.05 d | |
| RV 27-2 | - | - | - | - | |
| RV 23-2 | - | - | - | 1.70 ± 0.19 e | |
| PG 1-2 | - | - | 1.29 ± 0.07 b | 1.64 ± 0.20 e | |
| MGI 3-2 | - | - | - | - | |
| RV 12-2 | - | - | - | - | |
| PG 4-1 | - | - | - | 1.26 ± 0.01 f | |
| CMA 09 | 4.37 ± 1.64 a | 2.10 ± 0.07 b | - | 2.23 ± 0.67 d | |
| CMA 19 | 3.90 ± 0.00 a | - | - | 2.01 ± 0.04 d | |
| CMA 25 | - | - | 1.13 ± 0.02 b | 1.08 ± 0.05 f | |
| CO 10 | - | - | 1.42 ± 0.03 b | 1.31 ± 0.03 f | |
| RV 06 | - | 3.67 ± 0.31 a | - | 3.87 ± 0.12 b | |
| MGI 01 | 1.74 ± 0.04 b | 2.31 ± 0.10 b | 1.53 ± 0.08 b | 1.60 ± 0.05 e | |
| MGI 03 | - | 1.36 ± 0.04 b | - | 1.36 ± 0.04 f | |
| PG 1-1 | 1.47 ± 0.20 b | 1.84 ± 0.03 b | 1.91 ± 0.09 a | 2.90 ± 0.18 c | |
| MGI 02 | - | 1.71 ± 0.09 b | - | 1.31 ± 0.11 f | |
| CO 13 | - | - | 1.27 ± 0.06 b | - | |
| MGI 05 | 1.04 ± 0.00 b | 1.42 ± 0.04 b | - | 1.40 ± 0.24 f | |
| PG 17 | - | 1.76 ± 0.05 b | - | - |
* The data are the average and the standard deviation of the results obtained in three repetitions. Averages followed by the same letter (a, b, c, d, e or f) are not significantly different according to the Scott-Knott test (α = 0.01). Enzyme Index = R/r, where R is the degradation halo average diameter and r is the average colony diameter.
Figure 3Enzyme activity analysis. The data are the average and standard deviation obtained in three repetitions. Enzyme activity was expressed as the Enzymatic Index (□) or as the 1-(C/H) index (■). Averages followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to the Scott-Knott test (α = 0.01). Averages are ordered following the Enzymatic Index.
Figure 4Time course of extracellular enzyme production by fungal producers on solid media containing the corresponding substrates. Enzymatic activity is expressed as Enzymatic Index (halo diameter/colony diameter). A known producer (■) and a novel producer (♦) were evaluated.