Literature DB >> 26197258

Speech preparation in adults with persistent developmental stuttering.

Jeffrey R Mock1, Anne L Foundas2, Edward J Golob3.   

Abstract

Motor efference copy conveys movement information to sensory areas before and during vocalization. We hypothesized speech preparation would modulate auditory processing, via motor efference copy, differently in men who stutter (MWS) vs. fluent adults. Participants (n=12/group) had EEG recorded during a cue-target paradigm with two conditions: speech which allowed for speech preparation, while a control condition did not. Acoustic stimuli probed auditory responsiveness between the cue and target. MWS had longer vocal reaction times (p<0.01) when the cue-target differed (10% of trials), suggesting a difficulty of rapidly updating their speech plans. Acoustic probes elicited a negative slow wave indexing motor efference copy that was smaller in MWS vs. fluent adults (p<0.03). Current density responses in MWS showed smaller left prefrontal responses and auditory responses that were delayed and correlated to stuttering rate. Taken together, the results provide insight into the cortical mechanisms underlying atypical speech planning and dysfluencies in MWS.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory event-related potentials; Motor efference copy; Speech preparation; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26197258      PMCID: PMC4586364          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  62 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Age-related differences in auditory event-related potentials during a cued attention task.

Authors:  Ilana J Bennett; Edward J Golob; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: a review.

Authors:  Michelle Lincoln; Ann Packman; Mark Onslow
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Modulation of sensory and motor cortex activity during speech preparation.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Unit study of monkey frontal cortex: active localization of auditory and of visual stimuli.

Authors:  E Vaadia; D A Benson; R D Hienz; M H Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Martin Sommer; Martin A Koch; Walter Paulus; Cornelius Weiller; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.791

View more
  11 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Perceptual manifestations of auditory modulation during speech planning.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Reza Ebrahimpour; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural correlates of auditory sensory memory dynamics in the aging brain.

Authors:  Sandeepa Sur; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

6.  Modulation of Auditory Responses to Speech vs. Nonspeech Stimuli during Speech Movement Planning.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Shifted dynamic interactions between subcortical nuclei and inferior frontal gyri during response preparation in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  F Luise Metzger; Tibor Auer; Gunther Helms; Walter Paulus; Jens Frahm; Martin Sommer; Nicole E Neef
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Limited Pre-Speech Auditory Modulation in Individuals Who Stutter: Data and Hypotheses.

Authors:  Ludo Max; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Abnormal Sensorimotor Integration in Adults Who Stutter: A Behavioral Study by Adaptation of Delayed Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Daichi Iimura; Nobuhiko Asakura; Takafumi Sasaoka; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Sensorimotor Integration Can Enhance Auditory Perception.

Authors:  John C Myers; Jeffrey R Mock; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.