Weifeng Zhao1,2, Karin Odelius1, Ulrica Edlund1, Changsheng Zhao2, Ann-Christine Albertsson1. 1. †Fiber and Polymer Technology, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Teknikringen 56-58 SE-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. ‡College of Polymer Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China.
Abstract
A one-pot synthetic methodology for fabricating stimuli-responsive hemicellulose-based hydrogels was developed that consists of the in situ formation of magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles during the covalent cross-linking of O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan (AcGGM). The Fe3O4 nanoparticle content controlled the thermal stability, macrostructure, swelling behavior, and magnetization of the hybrid hydrogels. In addition, the magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels (MFRHHs) exhibited excellent adsorption and controlled release profiles with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the model drug. Therefore, the MFRHHs have great potential to be utilized in the biomedical field for tissue engineering applications, controlled drug delivery, and magnetically assisted bioseparation. Magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels, prepared using a straightforward one-step process, expand the applications of biomass-derived polysaccharides by combining the renewability of hemicellulose and the magnetism of Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
A one-pot synthetic methodology for fabricating stimuli-responsive hemicellulose-based hydrogels was developed that consists of the in situ formation of magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles during the covalent cross-linking of O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan (AcGGM). The Fe3O4 nanoparticle content controlled the thermal stability, macrostructure, swelling behavior, and magnetization of the hybrid hydrogels. In addition, the magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels (MFRHHs) exhibited excellent adsorption and controlled release profiles with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the model drug. Therefore, the MFRHHs have great potential to be utilized in the biomedical field for tissue engineering applications, controlled drug delivery, and magnetically assisted bioseparation. Magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels, prepared using a straightforward one-step process, expand the applications of biomass-derived polysaccharides by combining the renewability of hemicellulose and the magnetism of Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Hydrogels
are cross-linked
hydrophilic polymeric networks that
can retain a considerable amount of water or biological fluids in
their porous structure while maintaining their structure.[1−3] Hydrogels from natural materials, particularly those from renewable
sources, are attracting considerable attention in a variety of fields
to achieve sustainable development. Polysaccharide-based hydrogels
typically exhibit valuable properties, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility,
eco-friendliness, low cost, easy availability and biological functions,
making them promising materials for a range of applications. Among
the natural polysaccharides, hemicelluloses such as O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan (AcGGM) are particularly interesting due
to their good solubility in both water (green solvent) and organic
solvents, in addition to the general advantages of polysaccharides
mentioned above.[4−6] Hemicelluloses belong to a family of heteropolysaccharides
and constitute one of the main components of plant cell walls. Hemicelluloses
may be considered a renewable biopolymer resource with the potential
to replace current petrochemical-based materials for positive economic
and ecological impacts.Due to their excellent optical, mechanical,
and magnetic properties,
magnetic nanoparticles have received considerable interest in the
areas of magnetic storage media,[7] ferrofluids,[8] bimetallic nanoparticles catalysts,[9] and in biomedicine and technology (including
photothermal therapy,[10] targeted drug delivery,[11−15] and contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging[16,17]). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4) are the primary focus in the field of magnetic nanoparticles
due to their larger magnetic moments, excellent superparamagnetism,
and high stability in aqueous media.[18] A
combination of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and polysaccharide
hydrogels can be utilized as magnetic field-responsive hydrogels.
Brain-resembling, superabsorbent hydrogel composites have been produced
via UV-induced copolymerization-cross-linking of vinyl-modified starch
with functional monomers in the presence of Fe3O4 particles for use as oral drug-delivery systems.[19] Composite hydrogels of Fe3O4@Au and
κ-carrageenan were fabricated for the controlled release of
methylene blue.[20] Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2starch-graft-poly(acrylic
acid) hydrogels were prepared and used as adsorbents for the removal
of crystal violet from aqueous solutions to avoid secondary pollution.[21] A new organic/inorganic hybrid was generated
through the self-assembly of cholesterol-bearing pullulan hydrogels
and Fe3O4 nanoparticles for potential application
in magnetic hyperthermia therapy.[22] A promising
xylan/poly(acrylic acid) magnetic hydrogel adsorbent for water treatment
applications was prepared from wheat straw xylan and Fe3O4 nanoparticles.[23] Thermoresponsive
and pH-sensitive magnetic nanohydrogels with low toxicity and enhanced
anticancer effects have been developed using biodegradable starch-maleate
as a cross-linker and a magnetic nanoparticle stabilizer.[24] Covalent TiO2-co-pectin microspheres containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles
were developed using an ultrasound-induced cross-linking/polymerization
reaction, resulting in a material with the potential for use in biological
environments.[25] However, multistep reactions
of these organic/inorganic composite hydrogels as well as their tedious
purification may limit their use. Therefore, a facile approach for
the preparation of magnetic field-responsive polysaccharide hydrogels
is desired.Hemicellulose hydrogels can be prepared through
either covalent
or physical cross-linking. A hybrid hydrogel was prepared from hemicelluloses,
poly(vinyl alcohol), and chitin nanowhiskers using the freeze–thaw
technique, and this hydrogel exhibited promising properties for tissue
engineering applications.[26] Hemicellulose/poly(2-hydroxyethyl
methacrylate) (PHEMA)-based hydrogels were prepared via the radical
polymerization of HEMA with hemicellulose specifically modified with
well-defined amounts of methacrylic functions using a redox initiator
system.[27] Recently, the fabrication of
hemicellulose-based hydrogels has focused on endowing them with stimuli-responsive
properties. A series of monomers were grafted in a controlled/living
polymerization from the prepared hemicellulose macroinitiator to prevent
gelation in aqueous solution.[28] To address
current global environmental and resource problems, ionic renewable
hydrogels based on xylan-rich hemicelluloses offer multiple responses
to pH, ions, and organic solvents, and exhibit properties applicable
in adsorption, separation, and drug-release systems.[29] A temperature-sensitive hemicellulose hydrogel exhibited
tunable swelling behavior and morphology, implying their potential
as smart materials for medical applications.[30] A pH-sensitive and biodegradable hemicellulose-based hydrogel was
prepared by grafting AAc to hemicellulose as a powerful carrier for
controlled drug delivery.[31] In our recent
study, a robust pathway for the synthesis of electrically conductive
hemicellulose hydrogels (ECHHs) based on AcGGM and a conductive aniline
tetramer was reported, and these hydrogels exhibited broad potential
for biomedical applications.[32] To prepare
ECHHs using a more facile and greener approach, a one-pot reaction
in water at ambient temperature was developed and resulted in gels
with controllable conductivity, tunable swelling behavior, and acceptable
mechanical properties.[33] More recently,
covalent cross-linking during spray drying offered the potential for
the green fabrication of microgels that exhibited a rapid stimuli
response and good blood compatibility, providing a platform for stimuli-responsive
hemicellulose microgels (SRHMGs).[34] To
expand the applications of a biomass-derived polysaccharide by combining
the renewability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability of hemicellulose
and the magnetism of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, we
were inspired to functionalize hemicelluloses with magnetic field-responsive
properties using a straightforward one-step process.Our aim
was to develop and demonstrate a one-pot pathway for fabricating
stimuli-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels via the in situ formation
of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles during the covalent
cross-linking of hemicellulose. We propose that the content of Fe3O4 nanoparticles can be employed to tune the thermal
stability, macrostructure, swelling behavior and magnetization of
the hybrid hydrogels. In addition, the protein adsorption and release
profiles of the magnetic field-responsive polysaccharide hydrogels
could be controlled.
Experimental
Section
Materials
FeCl2 and FeCl3*6H2O were purchased from Aladdin Chemical Company,
Inc. (China) and were used as the metal ion sources. Sodium hydroxide
(NaOH), epichlorohydrin (ECH) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. AcGGM originating from spruce (Picea abies) was extracted from thermo-mechanical
pulping (TMP) processed water, purified and concentrated by ultrafiltration
(membrane cutoff 1 kDa) and lyophilized using a Lyolab 300 lyophilizer.
The carbohydrate composition of the AcGGM isolate was 17 mol % glucose,
65 mol % mannose, and 15 mol % galactose. AcGGM had a number-average
molecular weight (Mn) of approximately
7500 g mol–1 (DP ∼ 40), a dispersity of 1.3,
and a degree of acetylation of 30%, as determined by size exclusion
chromatography calibrated with MALDI-TOF.[35] All of the other chemical reagents were of analytical grade, purchased
from Xiya Reagent (China), and used without further purification.
Preparation of Magnetic Field-Responsive Hemicellulose
Hydrogels (MFRHHs)
Magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose
hydrogels (MFRHHs) were prepared using a one-pot reaction with varying
feed compositions, as shown in Scheme and Table . The reaction and a detailed scheme of the cross-linking
reaction involving an alkaline-mediated deprotonation of polysaccharide
hydroxyls and ring opening of epichlorohydrin is shown in Schemes
S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information.
Scheme 1
Proposed Synthesis of Magnetic Field-Responsive Hemicellulose
Hydrogels
in Basic Media
Table 1
Composition of Hemicellulose
Hydrogels
with a Base Content of 200 mg AcGGM
sample
Fe3O4 content (%, w/w)
FeCl2 (mg)
FeCl3*6H2O (mg)
NaOH (mg)
ECH (mg)
water (mL)
M-0
0
0
0
200
200
2
M-5
5
13.2
36.0
200
200
2
M-10
10
26.4
72.0
200
200
2
M-15
15
39.6
108.0
200
200
2
Briefly, 200 mg of AcGGM was dissolved in 1
mL of a 2.5 M NaOH
aqueous solution. Then, epichlorohydrin (200 mg) was added to the
resulting solution as a cross-linker. The desired amounts of FeCl3*6H2O and FeCl2 (molar ratio of Fe3+:Fe2+ = 2:1) were each dissolved in 1 mL of water.
The solution containing iron ions was added to the AcGGM solution
followed by rapid evacuation to remove the bubbles formed during stirring.
The cross-linking reaction was conducted at 60 °C for 20 min,
and the formed gels were washed with deionized water for 48 h to remove
the unreacted reagents, such as NaOH and metal ions. The deionized
water was changed frequently. The MFRHHs were maintained in deionized
water prior to further characterization. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared in the same manner without adding hemicellulose
and epichlorohydrin.The MFRHHs with 5, 10, and 15% (w/w) Fe3O4 nanoparticles were annotated according to their
equivalents of %
(w/w) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles as calculated from
the loading of Fe ions during synthesis (Table ). For example, M-5 contained 5% (w/w) Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Hydrogels without Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized as reference samples
and denoted as M-0.
Characterization
The size and morphology
of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were investigated
using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai F20) at
an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The specimens were prepared by
dropping the nanoparticles dispersed in ethanol onto carbon-coated
copper microgrids followed by drying under a UV lamp.FTIR spectroscopy
was employed to confirm the molecular structure of the hemicellulose
hydrogels in the dry state. The IR spectra were recorded as the average
of 16 scans at a resolution of 4 cm–1 between 4000
and 600 cm–1 using an ATR-FTIR (PerkinElmer Spectrum).[36]The thermal stability (thermogravimetric
analysis, TGA) of the
hydrogels in the dry state was investigated from 30 to 900 °C
at a heating rate of 5 °C/min under a dry nitrogen atmosphere
(flow rate of 50 mL/min) using a TG209F1 (Netzsch, Germany). Approximately
15 mg of each sample was placed into a 70 μL ceramic cup without
a lid.The swelling ratio (SR) of the hydrogels was determined
by immersing
the dry hydrogels in buffer solutions (prepared from Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4, pH = 7.2–7.4)
at room temperature. The masses of the samples in the swollen state
(ms,t) at different time points were measured
after gently removing excess water with filter paper. The SR was calculated
using eq :where md denotes
the masses of the samples in the dry state.The cross-sectional
morphology of the hydrogels was observed using
a JSM-7500F (JEOL, Japan) at a voltage of 5 kV. The fully swollen
samples were lyophilized overnight in small vials, cross-sectioned,
attached to the sample supports using carbon tape, and coated with
a 7 nm gold layer.The magnetization value of the hemicellulose
hydrogels in unit
mass was investigated using a Lakeshore 7410 vibrating sample magnetometer
(VSM) with an applied magnetic field of 2.0 T at room temperature
to detect the room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops. For each
sample, the data were collected at magnetic fields in the range of
±500 kA m–1 to determine the magnetization.The hemicellulose hydrogels (∼30 mg in the dried state)
were immersed in 10 mL of a BSA solution (3 mg/mL). The resulting
mixture was continuously shaken at 200 rpm at room temperature for
12 h, and then the hybrid hydrogels were removed magnetically. The
protein concentration in the solution was analyzed with a UV spectrophotometer
(Shimadzu UV-160A, Japan) at 280 nm. The protein adsorption loading
of the microspheres was calculated according to the mass balance before
and after adsorption, as expressed in the following equation:where Q is the BSA
adsorption capacity onto the unit amount of the
hydrogel (mg/g), C0 is the initial BSA
concentration (mg/mL), Ce is the final
or equilibrium BSA concentration (mg/mL), V is the
volume of BSA solution (mL), and W is the dry weight
of the hydrogel (mg). The protein release profile on the hemicellulose
hydrogels was determined in the same manner.
Results and Discussion
Magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose
hydrogels (MFRHHs) were
prepared by combining the magnetism of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the biocompatibility and renewability of hemicelluloseAcGGM. The powerful chemical coprecipitation method produced Fe3O4 nanoparticles with an average size of 5.8 nm, which was
confirmed by SEM and TEM observations, as shown in Figures S1 and
S2 (Supporting Information). The one-pot
preparation of MFRHHs was performed via the chemical coprecipitation
of Fe3O4 nanoparticles during the covalent cross-linking
of AcGGM. The properties of the hydrogels, such as the swelling behavior
and magnetism, were defined by the Fe3O4 nanoparticle
content.
Preparation of Magnetic-Responsive Hemicellulose
Hydrogels
The as-prepared hemicellulose hydrogels and ECHHs
were free-standing (Figure ). The pure hemicellulose hydrogel was yellowish, and the
magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose hydrogel was black due to
the in situ formation of Fe3O4 particles. The
pure hemicellulose hydrogel was considerably softer than the hybrid
hydrogel, which is consistent with a previous report.[37] The reason was that the addition of Fe3O4 particles enhanced the mechanical integrity of the polysaccharide
hybrid hydrogel.
Figure 1
Freshly prepared hemicellulose hydrogel (M-0) and magnetic
field-responsive
hemicellulose hydrogel (M-15).
Freshly prepared hemicellulose hydrogel (M-0) and magnetic
field-responsive
hemicellulose hydrogel (M-15).ATR-FTIR was employed to confirm the structural composition
of
the final magnetic field- responsive hemicellulose hydrogels. The
ATR-FTIR spectra of AcGGM as well as M-0 hydrogel through M-15 hydrogel
are shown in Figure . Pristine AcGGM exhibited characteristic C=O stretching at
1724 cm–1, which corresponds to the acetylated pendant
groups, some C–O–C vibrations at approximately 1022
cm–1 from the sugar units, a band corresponding
to bound water at 1640 cm–1, and a hydroxyl band
at 3000–3600 cm–1 (Figure a). The disappearance of the peak at 1724
cm–1 indicated deacetylation of AcGGM in the M-0,
M-5, M-10, and M-15 samples. The degree of deacetylation of AcGGM
strongly depended on the concentration of NaOH. AcGGM can be fully
deacetylated when the concentration of NaOH in the aqueous solution
is higher than 1 mol/L.[33,34] NaOH is also used to
form Fe3O4 in the current study. When more Fe3O4 is formed, more NaOH is consumed. Therefore,
more than 1 mol/L NaOH (2.5 mol/L) was utilized in the one-pot preparation
of MFRHHs. The complete deacetylation of AcGGM (Figures b–e) indirectly indicates that 2.5
mol/L NaOH was required for the coprecipitation of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 2
ATR-FTIR spectra of AcGGM (a), M-0 hydrogel
(b), M-5 hydrogel (c),
M-10 hydrogel (d), and M-15 hydrogel (e).
ATR-FTIR spectra of AcGGM (a), M-0 hydrogel
(b), M-5 hydrogel (c),
M-10 hydrogel (d), and M-15 hydrogel (e).
Thermal Properties of Magnetic-Responsive
Hemicellulose Hydrogels
Because the thermal decomposition
of AcGGM and Fe3O4 differ, the thermal behavior
of MFRHHs provides insight into their composition (Figure ). All of the hemicellulose
hydrogels lost 8% (w/w) of their weight, corresponding to the evaporation
of bound water below 200 °C. The hemicellulose hydrogel without
Fe3O4 (M-0) underwent degradation between 300
and 400 °C. At temperatures above 400 °C, the thermal stability
of all of the MFRHHs was lower than that of hemicellulose hydrogel
(M-0). The thermal degradation between 600 and 700 °C corresponds
to the loss of the Curie temperature (loss of ferromagnetism) of the
magnetic Fe3O4 particles.[38] According to the TGA curves, the Fe3O4 content was 3.0, 6.6, and 9.1% (w/w) for the M-5, M-10 and M-15
hydrogels, respectively. The Fe3O4 content increased
as the Fe3O4 loading increased from 5 to 15%
(w/w), which indicates the successful incorporation of Fe3O4 into the hydrogels.
Figure 3
TGA thermograms of AcGGM, M-0, M-5, M-10,
and M-15.
TGA thermograms of AcGGM, M-0, M-5, M-10,
and M-15.
Swelling
Behavior of MFRHHs
The swelling
behavior of MFRHHs in water was determined by the weight gain as a
function of time. The swelling ratio (SR) of the hydrogels can be
controlled by altering the cross-linking densities either by the molar
ratio of the cross-linker or the concentration of the functional materials.[39] Therefore, we anticipated that the SRs of the
MFRHHs could be tuned by varying the amounts of the functional materials
(i.e., Fe3O4 nanoparticles) to meet the requirements
of specific applications. The Fe3O4 content
significantly influenced the swelling behaviors of the hydrogels (Figure ). All of the hydrogels
swelled and reached equilibrium within 17 h. An increase in the amount
of Fe3O4 nanoparticles led to a decrease in
both the swelling rate and the equilibrium swelling ratio. When more
Fe3O4 nanoparticles were formed, the water adsorption
ability of the hybrid hydrogels was less than that of the pure hemicellulose
hydrogels, which lowered the swelling ratios. The equilibrium SRs
for the M-5, M-10, and M-15 hydrogels were 12.1, 7.4, and 2.4, respectively.
As expected, these values are lower than that of the hydrogel without
Fe3O4 nanoparticles (SR = 27.0). Swelling will
open up the pores and facilitate migration by diffusion, and hence
it is possible that some nanoparticles were released from the hydrogels
during the swelling study, although their hydrophobicity makes this
scenario less likely.
Figure 4
Swelling curves of M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15.
Swelling curves of M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15.The photographs of cut pieces of the M-0, M-5,
M-10, and M-15 hydrogels
in both the dry and swollen states (Figure ) indicate a volume increase following 17
h of swelling in PBS (pH = 7.2–7.4). The morphology of the
hydrogels remained constant with only negligible alterations in their
shape during swelling, which indicated that the hydrogels exhibited
good structural stability.
Figure 5
Photographs of hemicellulose hydrogel (M-0)
and MFRHHs (M-5, M-10,
and M-15) in the dry state (M-0-a, M-5-a, M-10-a, and M-15-a) and
swollen state (M-0-b, M-5-b, M-10-b, and M-15-b).
Photographs of hemicellulose hydrogel (M-0)
and MFRHHs (M-5, M-10,
and M-15) in the dry state (M-0-a, M-5-a, M-10-a, and M-15-a) and
swollen state (M-0-b, M-5-b, M-10-b, and M-15-b).
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of MFRHHs
The morphological changes of the hydrogels with and without Fe3O4 nanoparticles provide further information on
their swelling behavior. The SEM images of a cross-section of the
M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15 hydrogels in the swollen state after freeze-drying
are shown in Figure . All of the hydrogels possessed a homogeneous macroporous structure
after 17 h of swelling, indicating that these hydrogels swelled in
a homogeneous manner. The M-0 hydrogel had the largest pore size as
well as the greatest ability to accommodate water. The pores and/or
walls of the M-5, M-10, and M-15 samples were instead filled with
and/or attached to small particles (i.e., possibly aggregates of Fe3O4 nanoparticles), which resulted in lower water
absorption.
Figure 6
SEM images of cross sections of M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15 with ×100
(M-0-a, M-5-a, M-10-a, and M-15-a), × 300 (M-0-b, M-5-b, M-10-b,
and M-15-b) and ×2000 (M-0-c, M-5-c, M-10-c, and M-15-c) magnification.
SEM images of cross sections of M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15 with ×100
(M-0-a, M-5-a, M-10-a, and M-15-a), × 300 (M-0-b, M-5-b, M-10-b,
and M-15-b) and ×2000 (M-0-c, M-5-c, M-10-c, and M-15-c) magnification.Figure shows the
energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) from the SEM of the M-0 and M-15
hydrogels. The C, O, Au, and Fe elements were detected in the composite
hydrogel. However, the hydrogels without Fe3O4 (M-0) only contained C, O, and Au, confirming that the MFRHHs were
successfully formed by in situ synthesis of Fe3O4 during the covalent cross-linking of AcGGM. The presence of Au was
due to the deposition of a 7 nm thick gold layer onto the hydrogels
prior to observation with a SEM. According to the EDS results, the
content of the Fe element in the M-15 hydrogels was 5.3% (w/w), which
indicates that the Fe3O4 content in the M-15
hydrogels was approximately 7.3% (w/w). This result is consistent
with the TGA results.
Figure 7
EDS spectra obtained from SEM for the M-0, M-5, M-10,
and M-15
samples.
EDS spectra obtained from SEM for the M-0, M-5, M-10,
and M-15
samples.
Magnetic
Response of MFRHHs
The photographs
of the aqueous suspension of the magnetic particles and the MFRHHs
placed in a magnetic field are shown in Figure . The magnetic particles assembled and moved
directly to the left side of the 10 mL vial where the magnetic field
was applied. The MFRHHs (M-15) also possessed a magnetic response.
Magnetic responsive materials have been shown useful in controlled
drug release and in clinical diagnosis.[40]
Figure 8
Magnetic
response of magnetic particles and magnetic field-responsive
hemicellulose hydrogel (M-15): without a magnetic field (left) and
with a magnetic field (right).
Magnetic
response of magnetic particles and magnetic field-responsive
hemicellulose hydrogel (M-15): without a magnetic field (left) and
with a magnetic field (right).The magnetization of the MFRHHs increased as the Fe3O4 nanoparticle content increased, indicating the successful
formation of MFRHHs (Figure 9).
Figure 9
Magnetic hysteresis loops
of the M-5, M-10 and M-15 samples at
25 °C.
Magnetic hysteresis loops
of the M-5, M-10 and M-15 samples at
25 °C.
Protein
Release Profile
The adsorption
and release behavior of BSA of MFRHHs were studied. The adsorption
amount of BSA by the hemicellulose hydrogels (M-0) and MFRHHs (M-15)
were 100.2 and 146.5 mg/g, respectively. Therefore, the MFRHHs exhibited
a much larger BSA adsorption capacity than the pure hemicellulose
hydrogels. Therefore, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles
in the adsorbent played an important role in improving the adsorption
capacity due to Fe3O4 being available to adsorb
several BSA molecules, where the NH2 groups can bind with
the orbitals of the Fe atom.[41]Upon
release of BSA, there was a burst of release during the initial stage
(Figure ) because
the BSA loaded near the hydrogel surface could be immediately released
from the hybrid hydrogels into the medium when the hydrogels were
placed in the buffer solution (PBS, pH = 7.2–7.4). After the
initial burst, the subsequent release may involve a diffusion process
from the inside to the surface of the hydrogels. Based on the release
curves, BSA was released more rapidly from the hydrogels during the
first 12 h. More than 80 mg/g (>80%) of BSA was released from M-0,
and 109 mg/g (less than 74%) of BSA was released from M-15 after 5
days. The release profiles of M-10 and M-5 were very similar to the
release from sample M-15. The MFRHHs with controllable adsorption
and release behaviors could be used as a carrier for drug delivery.
Figure 10
BSA
release behavior of hemicellulose hydrogels (M-0) and MFRHHs
(M-15).
BSA
release behavior of hemicellulose hydrogels (M-0) and MFRHHs
(M-15).
Conclusions
Stimuli-responsive hemicellulose hydrogels were created in a one-pot
pathway via the in situ formation of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
during the covalent cross-linking of hemicellulose. The ATR-FTIR and
TGA results confirmed the successful incorporation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into hemicellulose hydrogels. The equilibrium
swelling ratios for the M-0, M-5, M-10, and M-15 hydrogels were 27.0,
12.1, 7.4, and 2.4, respectively, indicating that the content of magnetic
nanoparticles controlled the swelling behaviors of the hemicellulose
hydrogels. The MFRHHs also exhibited a magnetic response and superparamagnetism
due to the incorporation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles
into these hemicellulose hydrogels. The MFRHHs containing 15% (w/w)
Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited a BSA adsorption
capacity of 146.5 mg/g. The drug-loaded magnetic-field responsive
hemicellulose hydrogels released 74% (109 mg/g) of BSA in 5 days.
The MFRHHs with tunable swelling behavior as well as controllable
adsorption and release properties have potential applications in the
biomedical field including in controlled drug release and protein
separation.
Authors: Elisangela P da Silva; Danielly L A Sitta; Vanessa H Fragal; Thelma S P Cellet; Marcos R Mauricio; Francielle P Garcia; Celso V Nakamura; Marcos R Guilherme; Adley F Rubira; Marcos H Kunita Journal: Int J Biol Macromol Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: M Isabel Rial-Hermida; Ana Rey-Rico; Barbara Blanco-Fernandez; Natalia Carballo-Pedrares; Eimear M Byrne; João F Mano Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2021-06-17