Chemical cross-linking during spray drying offers the potential for green fabrication of microgels with a rapid stimuli response and good blood compatibility and provides a platform for stimuli-responsive hemicellulose microgels (SRHMGs). The cross-linking reaction occurs rapidly in situ at elevated temperature during spray drying, enabling the production of microgels in a large scale within a few minutes. The SRHMGs with an average size range of ∼ 1-4 μm contain O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan as a matrix and poly(acrylic acid), aniline pentamer (AP), and iron as functional additives, which are responsive to external changes in pH, electrochemical stimuli, magnetic field, or dual-stimuli. The surface morphologies, chemical compositions, charge, pH, and mechanical properties of these smart microgels were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy, IR, zeta potential measurements, pH evaluation, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping, respectively. Different oxidation states were observed when AP was introduced, as confirmed by UV spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. Systematic blood compatibility evaluations revealed that the SRHMGs have good blood compatibility. This bottom-up strategy to synthesize SRHMGs enables a new route to the production of smart microgels for biomedical applications.
Chemical cross-linking during spray drying offers the potential for green fabrication of microgels with a rapid stimuli response and good blood compatibility and provides a platform for stimuli-responsive hemicellulose microgels (SRHMGs). The cross-linking reaction occurs rapidly in situ at elevated temperature during spray drying, enabling the production of microgels in a large scale within a few minutes. The SRHMGs with an average size range of ∼ 1-4 μm contain O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan as a matrix and poly(acrylic acid), aniline pentamer (AP), and iron as functional additives, which are responsive to external changes in pH, electrochemical stimuli, magnetic field, or dual-stimuli. The surface morphologies, chemical compositions, charge, pH, and mechanical properties of these smart microgels were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy, IR, zeta potential measurements, pH evaluation, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping, respectively. Different oxidation states were observed when AP was introduced, as confirmed by UV spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. Systematic blood compatibility evaluations revealed that the SRHMGs have good blood compatibility. This bottom-up strategy to synthesize SRHMGs enables a new route to the production of smart microgels for biomedical applications.
Chemical
cross-linking and curing have played vital roles in the
alteration of the structure–property relationships of polymer
materials. The highly cross-linked structure of a material is linked
to superior mechanical properties, such as high modulus, high fracture
strength, and solvent resistance. Conventional cross-linking chemistry
includes polycondensation with multifunctional monomers leading to
chain growth and simultaneous formation of a chemical network.[1] Recently, a broad range of cross-linking chemistries
have been applied to create advanced materials that can perform self-healing
mechanisms triggered by Diels–Alder couplings, photochemical
reactions, disulfide bridges, radical fission, anionic reactions,
or pH.[2] Unfortunately, some cross-linking
processes create harsh environments that cause incompatibility with
living cells and tissues if the material is utilized in biomedical
applications.[3,4] Some processes are also time-consuming
and/or include many steps to create a densely cross-linked structure
in polymer-based materials.[5,6]Hemicellulose,
a byproduct in the wood industry, is categorized
as the second most abundant group of polysaccharides in plants after
cellulose and constitutes 15–35% (w/w) of wood and higher plants.[7] The existence of multiple hydroxyl groups on
the hemicellulose backbone potentially creates a number of possibilities
for chemical modification and preparation of materials with new profiles
to enhance the utility of these natural polymers.[8] Hemicellulose hydrogels have been developed via robust
cross-linking pathways, which is attributed to the excellent solubility
of O-acetyl-galactoglucomannan (AcGGM) in water,
dimethylformarmide (DMF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).[9] Multistep reactions and tedious purification
are challenges necessary to overcome to produce other advanced materials
from hemicellulose that cover a broad range of applications and that
are tunable to the desired environment by oxidation–reduction
(redox), pH, and electric and magnetic field stimuli.Microgels
are micrometer-sized cross-linked hydrogels, which have
great potential for use in organic dye removal, controlled surface
patterning, and vocal fold regeneration, as well as for use as drug
delivery carriers and cell culture substrates.[10−14] Microgels, such as bulk hydrogels, are three-dimensional
hydrophilic networks that can absorb up to multiple times their dry
weight in water and therefore enable mimicking of the extracellular
environment of human organs.[15] The particular
structure and low viscosity of microgel suspensions make it possible
to inject them into the human body.[16] An
attractive subclass of microgels is stimuli-responsive microgel, in
which the volumetric expansion is a response to external stimuli such
as pH, ionic strength, light, or temperature.[17−21] Dual stimuli-responsive microgels have recently been
developed that respond to temperature and solvent concentration,[22] magnetic field and temperature,[23] pH and ionic strength,[24] pH
and an applied electric field,[25] and temperature
and UV light.[26] In addition, multiresponsive
microgels have attracted much attention because their multifunctions
can mimic the complex microenvironments in the human body[27−29] and potentially embrace a wide range of applications. They have
also been created to respond to the combined stimuli of (1) the temperature,
pH, and light irradiation,[27] (2) the temperature,
pH, and magnetic field,[28] and (3) the ionic
strength, temperature, and pH.[29]Spray drying offers advantages such as efficiency, high yield,
reproducibility, and more controllable distribution of particle size
compared with other particle fabrication techniques.[30,31] Thus, the production of spray-dried microparticles has gained interest
and is widely used in the pharmaceutical, food, and chemical industries.[32,33] Spray drying has been used to produce a reproducible coating layer
of hemicellulose particles on polyethylene terephthalate substrates,[34] stereocomplexed particles of a poly(lactic acid)
and poly(d-lactide) polymer blend,[35] and inorganic particles consisting of a mixed Ti/Al2O3 as a functional artificial tooth root.[36] It has also been used to modify calcium phosphate bone
cement composites[37] and to fabricate antigen-loaded
porous polyelectrolyte microparticles for use in oral antigen delivery.[33] If a strategy was developed for mediating the
cross-linking of microgels during spray drying, it could be connecting
the chemical modification of materials and industrial processing.Our aim is to develop a facile, fast, and functional (3F) approach
to creating stimuli-responsive hemicellulose microgels (SRHMGs) by
single-step chemical cross-linking of AcGGM during spray drying. Using
this strategy, cross-linking hemicellulose hydrogels with new profiles
enhances their physicochemical properties in a broad range of applications.
AcGGM was used to achieve renewable and value-added products; the
poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), aniline pentamer (AP), and iron (Fe) additive
provide SRHMGs that are responsive to external changes in pH, electrochemical
stimuli, magnetic field, or a combination (dual-stimuli). We anticipate
that this strategy will offer a 3F approach to produce SRHMGs without
tedious purification because the solvent and the unreacted cross-linker
will be removed during spray drying.
Experimental Section
Materials
Hydrochloric acid (HCl),
sodium hydroxide (NaOH), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), monosodium phosphate (NaH2PO4), epichlorohydrin (ECH), iron (Fe, 35–45 nm) particles, and
PAA (35 wt % aqueous solution) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and
used as received unless otherwise stated. Citric acid monohydrate
(C6H8O7·H2O) was
obtained from Acros Organics. AcGGM originating from spruce (Picea abies) was extracted from thermomechanical pulping
(TMP) processed water, purified, concentrated by ultrafiltration (membrane
cutoff 1 kDa), and lyophilized using a Lyolab 300 lyophilizer. The
carbohydrate composition of the AcGGM isolate was 17 mol % glucose,
65 mol % mannose, and 15 mol % galactose. AcGGM had a number-average
molecular weight (Mn) of approximately
7500 g mol–1 (DP ≈ 40), a dispersity (Đ) of 1.3, and a degree of acetylation (DSAc) of 30%, as determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) calibrated
with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass
spectrometry.[38] The AP was synthesized
according to a previous report.[39]
Methods
Fabricating Microgels
The cross-linked
hemicellulose-based
microparticles were prepared in a one-pot approach. The mixture of
1200 mg of AcGGM, 1200 mg of NaOH, 1440 mg of ECH, and certain amount
of functional materials were dissolved in 30 mL of water. The solutions
were fed from the glass container, heated at 185–200 °C
with a 35 m3/min aspirator, and then sprayed out as fine
droplets into the drying chamber, using a Mini Spray Dryer B-290 (Büchi
Labortechnik AG, Switzerland). By means of an air flow (500–700
Nl/h), the droplets were transported into a small chamber and eventually
precipitated into particles in a small vial. The prepared solutions
were sprayed through the 0.7 mm fluid nozzles in the spray dryer.
The detailed parameters for spray-drying procedure are listed in Table 1. The particles were washed with 50 mL of deionized
water and centrifuged at 5000 rpm five times. The stimuli-responsive
hemicellulose microgels were obtained after freeze-drying for 2 d
and kept in the desiccator.
Table 1
Parameters for Spray-Drying
Process
name
aspirator
degree (%)
inlet temperature
(°C)
outlet temperature
(°C)
gas flow (mL/min)
pump (%)
H40
100
185 ± 3
85 ± 2
45
10
H40AP16
100
185 ± 2
85 ± 4
35
10
H40PAA8
100
185 ± 3
85 ± 3
45
10
H40Fe16
100
185 ± 2
85 ± 3
45
10
H40AP8PAA4
100
200 ± 3
100 ± 4
45
10
Scanning Electron Microscope
The morphology of the
stimuli-responsive hemicellulose microgels was observed by Ultra-High
Resolution FE-SEM (Hitachi S-4800). The samples were lyophilized overnight
in small vials, attached to the sample supports using carbon tape,
and coated with a 3.5 nm gold layer.
Fourier Transform Infrared
FTIR spectra were recorded
using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 2000 spectrometer (PerkinElmer Instrument,
Inc.) equipped with a single reflection attenuated total reflectance
(ATR) accessory (golden gate) from Graseby Specac (Kent, U.K.). FTIR
was used to verify the molecular structure of the stimuli-responsive
hemicellulose microgels in a dry state. Each spectrum was recorded
as the average of 16 scans at a resolution of 4 cm–1 between 4000 and 600 cm–1.
Thermogravimetric
Analysis
For the thermal stability
of the hydrogels, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the stimuli-responsive
hemicellulose microgels was performed using a Mettler-Toledo TGA/SDTA
851e. Approximately 10 mg of each sample was put into a 70 μL
ceramic cup without a lid. TGA tests were conducted under an N2 atmosphere (flow rate of 50 mL/min) with a heating rate of
10 °C/min from 30 to 800 °C. The data were collected and
analyzed with Mettler STARe software.
UV–vis Tests
The UV–vis spectra of H40AP16 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels in pH 2.2–7.4
buffer solution were recorded on
a UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV-2401) with a wavelength of 280–900
nm.
Cyclic Voltammetry
CV measurements of the H40AP16 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels
were performed on a potentiostat with a scan rate of 60 mV·s–1. Platinum wires were used as the working and auxiliary
electrodes, and a K/KCl electrode was used as the reference. The samples
were prepared by dispersing 15 mg of the H40AP16 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels in 6 mL
of DMSO and doping the sample with three drops of 2 M HCl.
Zeta
Potential Measurements
Zeta potential measurements
were performed on a Nano Zetasizer with a 633 nm He–Ne laser
from Malvern Instrument U.K., Inc. Stimuli-responsive hemicellulose
microgels (0.8 g/L) were prepared with pH 2.2–7.4 buffer solution:
pH 2.2–6.38 buffer solutions were prepared from C6H8O7·H2O, HCl, and NaOH; pH
7.4 buffer solution was prepared from Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4. Each sample was measured three
times, while each measurement consisted of 30 acquisitions. A 120
s delay between each measurement was used to prevent “charging”
of the sample. All samples were measured at 25 °C with thermal
conducting plates and 1 min of thermal equilibration.
Swelling
Ratio Measurements
The swelling ratio (SR)
of the hydrogels was determined by immersing dry hydrogels in buffer
solutions (prepared from Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4, pH = 7.4) at room temperature. The weights
of the samples in the swollen state (ms,t) at different time points were measured after gently removing excess
water with filter paper. The SR was calculated using eq 1, where md denotes the weight
of the samples in the dry state.
Vibrating
Sample Magnetometer
A vibrating sample magnetometer
(EG&G Princeton Applied Research VSM model 155) was used to detect
the room-temperature magnetic hysteresis loops. For each sample the
data was collected at magnetic fields in the range of ±500 kA
m–1 to determine the magnetization.
Atomic Force
Microscopy
Mechanical properties on the
hemicellulose-based microspheres surface were characterized using
PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping (QNM) mode (PeakForce
QNM) of a nanoscope V8 multimode AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara,
CA) via 7850 EV scanner under ambient condition. The particulate samples
were scanned using silicon-based cantilever (TAP150, P/N MPP-12120-10)
with nominal spring constant of 5 N/m at a resonant frequency of 150
kHz. Actual spring constant of cantilever was in the range of 4.1–4.4
N/m after calibration with the thermal tune method. The calibrated
cantilever was ramped three times on the selected areas of 200 nm
× 200 nm on the hard surface (silica) to get the updated sensitivity.
It was later scanned on a standard polystyrene/low density polyethylene
(PS/LDPE) sample that was already known its mechanical contact. During
nanomechanical measurements, the obtained force profiles were analyzed
using Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov model.[40]According to this model, mechanical contact was expressed
from the following equation.where a, δ, F, R, W, and Etot are tip–sample contact
radius, deformation,
adhesion force, tip radius, work of adhesion per unit area, and the
reduced Young’s modulus, respectively.
Clotting
Time
To evaluate the antithrombogenicity of
the stimuli-responsive hemicellulose microgels, activated partial
thromboplastin time (APTT) and thrombin time (TT) were measured by
an automated blood coagulation analyzer CA-50 (Sysmex Corporation,
Kobe, Japan) according to the method described in a previous report.[41] Healthy human fresh blood was collected in vacuum
tubes containing sodium citrate as the anticoagulant (anticoagulant
to blood ratio, 1:9 v/v), and the platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was obtained
after centrifuging at 4000 rpm for 15 min. Stimuli-responsive hemicellulose
microgels (10 mg/mL) were prepared in buffer solution (pH = 7.4),
5 μL suspensions and 100 μL of PPP were incubated at 37
°C for 0.5 h, and 50 μL of incubated solution was then
added to the test cup, followed by the addition of 50 μL of
APTT agent (Dade Actin Activated Cephaloplastin Reagent, Siemens;
incubated 10 min before use). The solution was incubated at 37 °C
for another 3 min, and 50 μL of 0.025 M CaCl2 was
subsequently added. The APPT was recorded by an automated blood coagulation
analyzer CA-50. Two independent measurements were averaged to reach
a reliable value. The TT test was performed in a process similar to
that of the APTT test. The only difference is the APTT agent replaced
by Test Thrombin Reagent (Siemens; incubated 10 min before use).
Hemolysis Test
The hemolysis test was performed as
previously reported.[42] In brief, 10 mL
of whole blood was added to 20 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
solution (pH = 7.4) and then centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min five
times to isolate red blood cells (RBCs) from human plasma, and the
RBCs were diluted into PBS solution with a final volume of 100 mL.
Then, 0.2 mL of the diluted RBC suspension (∼5 × 108 cells/mL) was added to 1.8 mL of the 20 mg/mL stimuli-responsive
hemicellulose microgels. Deionized water dispersed RBCs was used as
the positive control, and the PBS (pH 7.4) dispersed RBCs were used
as the negative control. All the suspensions were incubated in a rocking
shaker at 37 °C for 3 h and then centrifuged at 10 016
g for 3 min. The absorbance of the released hemoglobin in the suspensions
was measured at 540 nm using a UV–vis spectrophotometer. The
hemolysis ratio was calculated using eq 4.
Whole Blood Clotting Time
To investigate the whole
blood clotting time (WBCT), 10 μL of the 10 mg/mL microgels
suspension in pH 7.4 buffer solution was added to 50 μL of fresh
blood without any anticoagulant, and timing was begun immediately
just after the blood came in contact with the particles. The whole
blood was monitored for clotting by manual dipping with a stainless-steel
wire hook coated with silicone into the blood to detect fibrin threads.
The clotting time was recorded at the first sign of any fibrin formation
on the hook. The test was repeated three times for each sample, and
a reliable value was obtained.
Results
and Discussion
In the past decade, spray drying has been
used to produce coatings[34] and microparticles[35] due to its efficiency, high yield, and reproducibility.
Here, a
chemical cross-linking process during spray drying was developed to
produce hemicellulose microgels to achieve value-added and renewable
products. The combination of the biocompatibility of hemicellulose
and the promising properties of the functional additives may offer
possibilities for the use of SRHMGs in biomedical applications.
Microgel Synthesis
The SRHMGs were
prepared via a 3F spray-drying process. A mixture of 1200 mg of AcGGM,
1200 mg of NaOH, 1440 mg of ECH, and specific amounts of functional
materials were dissolved in 30 mL of water. The solutions were pumped
and heated to 185–200 °C at the nozzle and then sprayed
out as fine droplets into a glass chamber using a mini spray dryer
(B-290, Büchi Labortechnik AG, Switzerland). PAA, AP, and Fe
nanopowders were chosen as stimuli-responsive additives to offer pH
sensitivity, electroactivity, and magnetic response, respectively.
The compositions of the reaction mixtures for the cross-linked microgels
are shown in Table 2. The SRHMGs were annotated
according to their concentrations (% w/v) in water. For example, H40AP16 contained 40 g/L of AcGGM and 16 g/L of AP
in an aqueous solution. Microgels without functional additives (H40) were synthesized as reference samples and were denoted
according to the same system.
Table 2
Compositions of Cross-Linked
Microgels
name
function
AcGGM (mg)
functional materials (mg)
NaOH
(mg)
ECH (mg)
H2O (mL)
H40
No
1200
0
1200
1440
30
H40AP16
electroactivity
1200
AP
480
1200
1440
30
H40PAA8
pH response
1200
PAA
240
1200
1440
30
H40Fe16
magnetism
1200
Fe powder
480
1200
1440
30
H40AP8PAA4
dual-function
1200
AP/PAA
240/120
1200
1440
30
The developed
spray-drying process is shown in Scheme 1 with
the sample H40AP16 as
an example. In addition to solubilizing AP, NaOH (aq) acted as a catalyst
and a proton scavenger for the cross-linking reaction. A 40 g/L AcGGM
aqueous solution could be cross-linked via 44 g/L ECH at room temperature
in 12 h, or it could be cross-liked in 1 h when heated to 65 °C.
Therefore, the hemicellulose network could be formed more rapidly
when higher temperatures (185–200 °C) were used during
the spray-drying process, and the functional additives were eventually
immobilized in the hemicellulose network. The short exposure time
to the high outlet temperature minimizes the risk of thermal degradation
of the hemicellulose polysaccharide backbone. The prepared SRHMGs
combined the nontoxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and
renewability of AcGGM with the functionalities of PAA, AP, and Fe.
The crude SRHMGs were dispersed in 35 mL of deionized water and centrifuged
at 5000 rpm. Images of the microgels before and after centrifugation
are shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). The SRHMGs were insoluble in water and remained at the bottom
of the tubes after centrifugation, indicating that the cross-linking
reaction was successfully performed and that no soluble fraction remained
after spray drying.
Scheme 1
SRHMG Production (with H40AP16 as an example)
via a Spray Dryer
There are several benefits of the present strategy: (1)
a single-step
cross-linking reaction occurs in situ during the spray-drying process;
(2) the spray dryer operating conditions are easily tuned within a
wide range to control the product quality; (3) compared with other
routes, spray drying rapidly produces the desired gels (within a few
minutes); and (4) because of the high processing temperature (200
°C), both the solvent (water, bp 100 °C) and the unreacted
cross-linker (ECH, bp 114 °C) can be completely removed during
spray drying.Of the freshly prepared SRHMGs, the H40 (a-1) and H40PAA8 (c-1) microgels were lighter
in color, whereas
the H40AP16 (b-1) and H40Fe16 (d-1) microgels were darker due to the colored AP and Fe. SEM images
of the SRHMGs are shown in Figure 1 (a-2, b-2,
c-2, d-2, and e-2). Most of the microgels showed spherical morphologies,
although a few of them had imperfect spherical or slightly shriveled
structures depending on the functional additives that were cosprayed
with the hemicellulose bulk material. The composition of the solution
appeared to influence the morphology of the particulate materials.
The microgel particle size distributions were calculated from the
SEM analyses, also shown in Figure 1 (a-3,
b-3, c-3, d-3, and e-3). The average particle size of the pure hemicellulose
microgels (H40) was ∼2.0 ± 1.0 μm, whereas
the H40AP16 and H40PAA8 microgels had the lowest average size (∼1.3 ± 0.3 μm).
The particle size increased to 2.7 ± 2.2 μm when AP and
PAA were simultaneously added. Specifically, a narrow particle size
distribution was observed when aniline oligomers (Figure 1b-3) or PAA (Figure 1c-3)
was incorporated into and/or adsorbed onto the cross-linked hemicellulose.
In contrast with the H40AP16 and H40PAA8 microgels, the introduction of AP and PAA resulted
in the broadest particle size distribution (Figure 1e-3). Clearly, the particle size differed between compositions
due to the introduction of additives. The diameter of the dried particle
is dependent on its droplet size and density of the droplet and particle.
The droplet itself is a function of the surface tension. A decrease
in the microgel diameter is caused by strong surface tension. AP appeared
to provide stronger attractive intermolecular interactions in the
cross-linked hemicellulose network than PAA, resulting in strong surface
tension. A smaller dried particle size could be then obtained. On
the contrary, the introduction of AP and PAA simultaneously reduced
the surface tension of the liquid droplet, leading to larger diameter
particles due to stronger repulsive intermolecular interactions inside
the hemicellulose matrix. Fe nanopowders have a high density and are
insoluble in water (were in suspension in the present research), which
induces a wide size distribution of H40Fe16 microgel
particles. The H40Fe16 microgels had an average
size greater than 1 μm, and magnetic field responsive particles
in this size range can be used for bowel contrast (mean diameter no
less than 300 nm) and liver/spleen imaging.[43] In addition, the dispersibility of the cross-linked microgels was
assessed to calculate their hydrodynamic diameters using dynamic light
scattering. The retrieved data was, however, ambiguous due to the
somewhat irregular shape, wide size distribution, and polydispersity
of the cross-linked microgels. As an alternative, we used an SEM coupled
with energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis to evaluate not only
the size and structural information on the cross-linked microgels
(Figure 1) but also the existence of functional
additives such as Fe that were randomly distributed on the surface
(Figure 5B).
Figure 1
Freshly prepared SRHMGs (a-1, b-1, c-1,
d-1, and e-1), SEM images
(a-2, b-2, c-2, d-2, and e-2) and size distribution (a-3, b-3, c-3,
d-3, and e-3) of H40 (a-1, a-2, and a-3), H40AP16 (b-1, b-2, and b-3), H40PAA8 (c-1, c-2, and c-3), H40Fe16 (d-1, d-2, and
d-3), and H40AP8PAA4 (e-1, e-2, and
e-3).
Figure 5
Magnetic
hysteresis of H40Fe16 (a), EDS spectrum
of H40Fe16 (b), and EDS spectrum of H40 (c) microgels.
Freshly prepared SRHMGs (a-1, b-1, c-1,
d-1, and e-1), SEM images
(a-2, b-2, c-2, d-2, and e-2) and size distribution (a-3, b-3, c-3,
d-3, and e-3) of H40 (a-1, a-2, and a-3), H40AP16 (b-1, b-2, and b-3), H40PAA8 (c-1, c-2, and c-3), H40Fe16 (d-1, d-2, and
d-3), and H40AP8PAA4 (e-1, e-2, and
e-3).The IR spectra of the SRHMGs are
shown in Figure S2 (Supporting Information). The pristine hemicellulose
microgels displayed an H–O–H deformation vibration of
absorbed water at ∼1635 cm–1 and a hydroxyl
band at 3000–3600 cm–1 (Figure S2a). The C=O stretching at 1730
cm–1 stemming from the acetylated pendant groups
disappeared due to the deacetylation of AcGGM in the presence of NaOH.[44] The IR spectrum of H40AP16 in Figure S2b shows not only amide group
absorption at 1655 cm–1 and the characteristic peaks
of the benzenoid ring at 1601 and 1509 cm–1 from
AP but also the signals from the H40 microgel, indicating
that AP was incorporated into and/or adsorbed onto the hemicellulose-based
microgels. In contrast, the H40PAA8 microgel
spectrum showed −C–O– group absorption bands
at 1662 and 1570 cm–1 from PAA (Figure S2c). The ATR-FTIR spectrum of the H40AP8PAA4 microgel in Figure S2e shows the signals of both H40AP16 and H40PAA8, which indicated the successful introduction
of PAA and AP into the composite microgels. Compared with H40, all of the other microgels displayed a small peak at 1736 cm–1, which was attributed to acetylated pendant groups
that indicated that the deacetylation of AcGGM was not complete.Because the thermal decomposition of AcGGM and the functional additives
are different, the thermal behavior of the SRHMGs yields information
about the microgel composition (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). The hemicellulose hydrogel (H40) underwent degradation between 300 and 400 °C. At temperatures
above 400 °C, all of the functional microgels had lower weight
loss compared with the pure hemicellulose microgel (H40) due to the higher onset temperatures for thermal degradation of
the functional additives. For the H40Fe16 microgel,
a sharp decrease in weight (or force) at 575 °C was due to the
Curie temperature (loss of ferromagnetism) of the magnetic particles.[45]The images, the IR spectra, and the thermal
decomposition of the
SRHMGs convinced us that the stimuli-responsive additives were blended
with the hemicellulose-based microgels. The content and percent incorporation
efficiency of functional additives in the SRHMGs are shown in Supporting Information, Table S1. The percent
incorporation efficiencies of various stimuli-responsive additives
are 70, 84, 42, and 52% for H40AP16, H40PAA8, H40Fe16, and H40AP8PAA4 microgels, respectively.
Electroactivity of the Microgels
The ability of materials
to transmit bioelectrical signals in vivo
and/or in vitro plays a significant role in their applications in
the biomedical field. To make a polymeric material electroactive,
the electrons must move within the materials, which is enabled by
oxidation or reduction.[46] AP is made electroactive
via chemical or electrochemical oxidation or reduction, which is attributed
to its conjugated structure. By introducing AP, hemicellulose microgels
are able to exhibit electroactivity. The minimum pH in the human body
is ∼1–2 in the stomach, whereas the body pH level (blood)
is slightly alkaline (pH ≈ 7.4). Therefore, the UV–vis
spectra of 0.8 g/L H40AP16 (a) and H40AP8PAA4 (b) microgels were recorded in buffer
solutions in a pH range of 2.2–7.4 (Figure 2). The H40AP16 (a) and H40AP8PAA4 (b) microgel suspensions showed two
characteristic peaks at 310 and 609 nm corresponding to the benzene
and quinoid groups at pH 7.4, respectively. Interestingly, these two
peaks gradually decreased with decreasing pH. The peak at 609 nm almost
disappeared when the pH of the aqueous buffer solution reached 2.2.
Two new peaks at 461 and 850 nm were related to the formation of polarons
from the electron transition of quinoid to benzenoid units, as shown
in Figure S4 (Supporting Information).[47] The intensities of these two peaks increased
with decreasing pH. The more H+ ions in solution, the higher
the concentration of radical cations (polarons) formed. In other words,
the reaction shifted to the polaron direction as the pH decreased.
This result explains why the color of the H40AP16 (c) and H40AP8PAA4 (d) microgel
solutions altered with pH (Figure 2).
Figure 2
UV–vis
spectra of H40AP16 (a) and
H40AP8PAA4 (b) in different pH aqueous
buffer solutions. Images of H40AP16 (c) and
H40AP8PAA4 (d) in different pH aqueous
buffer solutions. Cyclic voltammograms of H40AP16 (e) and H40AP8PAA4 (f) in DMSO
doped with three drops of 2 M HCl solution.
AP exhibits four different oxidation states of the aniline segments:
the fully reduced leucoemeraldine (LMAP), the emeraldine I (EMAP I),
the emeraldine II (EMAP II), and the fully oxidized pernigraniline
state.[46,48] The H40AP16 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels were prepared with
the fully reduced LMAP or the partially oxidized EMAP. Cyclic voltammetry
(CV) of H40AP16 (e) and H40AP8PAA4 (f) in DMSO doped with three drops of 2 M
HCl solution confirmed that the microgels were electroactive and that
the AP in these microgels retained its ability to be repeatedly oxidized
and reduced. The CV measurements also confirmed the reversibility
of oxidation and reduction. The H40AP16 microgels
(e) exhibited three characteristic redox peaks for AP (Figure S5 in
the Supporting Information). The first
redox peak corresponded to the transition from the LMAP state to the
EMAP I state, the second one from the EMAP I state to the EMAP II
state, and the last one from the EMAP II state to the fully oxidized
pernigraniline state (Figure S6, Supporting Information).[46,48] However, the second redox peak for the H40AP8PAA4 (f) microgel almost disappeared.
The reason for this result might be due to the complex interaction
between AP and the polymeric dopant PAA that allows AP to be quickly
oxidized and reduced from the EMAP I state to the EMAP II state.UV–vis
spectra of H40AP16 (a) and
H40AP8PAA4 (b) in different pH aqueous
buffer solutions. Images of H40AP16 (c) and
H40AP8PAA4 (d) in different pH aqueous
buffer solutions. Cyclic voltammograms of H40AP16 (e) and H40AP8PAA4 (f) in DMSO
doped with three drops of 2 M HCl solution.
Microgel pH Sensitivity
The swelling
behavior of the microgels was assessed in the 2.2–7.4 pH range
to demonstrate the pH sensitivity of the hybrid microgels (Figure 3). The equilibrium swelling ratio of the pure hemicellulose
(H40) microgels was as high as 25.5 at pH = 7.4, which
was due to the hydrophilicity of AcGGM. This value for the H40 microgels was stable even after two cycles of acidic/alkine treatments.
The H40PAA8 microgels exhibited a swelling/deswelling
behavior as the solvent conditions changed from pH = 7.4 to pH = 2.2.
Interestingly, the H40PAA8 microgels had a higher
equilibrium swelling ratio in comparison with that of the H40 microgels, which was likely due to the hydrogen bonding between
the hemicellulose (AcGGM) and PAA. PAA is a weak polyacid that is
sensitive to pH. At low pH, the acrylic acid groups undergo protonation,
and they become more ionized with increasing pH. In other words, repulsive
interactions among neighboring PAA chains tend to provide a strong
swelling effect, in particular at high pH, as shown in Figure 3a. Thus, their swelling behavior is governed by
conformational changes of the polymeric chains from low to high pH
values. The equilibrium swelling ratio of the H40AP8PAA4 microgels decreased due to the addition of
AP.[44] This result might be due to attractive
interactions between the acrylic acid groups and AP, shrinking the
chain conformation and shifting to deswelling behavior. The pH reversibility
of the swelling ratios of the H40PAA8 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels is also an indirect
way to confirm the successful cross-linking of hemicellulose. The
resulting microgels can swell and deswell in a predictable way as
the solvent conditions change based on environmental stimuli (pH),
thereby enabling improved control over their properties relative to
other reported approaches.
Figure 3
Equilibrium swelling ratio of the SRHMGs under
repeated pH changes
between 7.4 and 2.2 (a). Zeta potential of the SRHMGs (b).
Equilibrium swelling ratio of the SRHMGs under
repeated pH changes
between 7.4 and 2.2 (a). Zeta potential of the SRHMGs (b).The flexibility in tuning the charge properties
of the microgels
makes them a suitable choice for various biological applications.[49] Zeta potential measurements demonstrate whether
the microgels have a positive or negative surface charge. It can also
be used to evaluate the microgel stability in a liquid at specific
pH values. The higher the zeta potential, the higher the stability
of the particle suspension.[50] The zeta
potentials of the SRHMGs reflected their charge properties. They were
recorded on a Nano Zetasizer and plotted in Figure 3b. The zeta potential of all of the microgels decreased as
the pH increased. The H40 microgels had an almost linear
relationship between the zeta potential and pH. The H40AP16 microgels showed a decrease in zeta potential compared
with the H40 microgels at pH > 6 because of the ability
of AP to move protons. The H40PAA8 microgels
had a significant zeta potential decrease at pH > 4 continuing
to
−11 mV due to the pKa of PAA (∼4.1).
The carboxyl group of PAA is deprotonated when the pH is greater than
the pKa of PAA, and both the bulk and
surface of the microgels are therefore negatively charged, resulting
in a dramatic decrease in the zeta potential to more negative values.
The difference between H40 and H40PAA8 is that the latter contain PAA, which effectively is a polyelectrolyte
with ionizable pendant groups in every repeating unit. Hence, H40PAA8 is sensitive toward changes in pH, which
will be reflected in a significant change in the surface charge of
the microgels. When AP was added to the microgels (H40),
the starting zeta potential was ∼2 mV, which was followed by
a sharp decrease, finally reaching a value of −15 mV. The reason
for this result was because PAA could be a polymeric dopant of AP,
and they created a synergistic effect on their zeta potentials. The
H40AP8PAA4 microgels were the most
stable of the microgels at high pH due to more negative zeta potential.
This result means that their tendency to aggregate in liquid is much
less compared with other microgel-based systems. All of the SRHMGs
had a lower zeta potential at pH 7.4 than the pure hemicellulose microgels,
indicating their possibility for use in biomedical applications.
Microgel Magnetic Response
Pictures
of magnetic-responsive hemicellulose microgels (H40Fe16) placed in a magnetic field are shown in Figure 4. Clearly, the magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose
microgels in the solid state could be adsorbed to magnets within 25
s (Figure 4, left) as a result of the presence
of Fe nanopowders. Interestingly, the H40Fe16 microgels can be suspended into a 10 mg/mL aqueous solution (Figure 4, middle) due to the hydrophilicity of hemicellulose
(AcGGM). These microgels assembled within 30 s at the bottom of the
10 mL vial where the magnetic field was applied. The magnetic field-responsive
hemicellulose microgels could move directly to the left side of the
vial in 10 s, and the vial could be pulled away due to the force between
the magnetic field and the Fe nanopowders. Clearly, the magnetic field-responsive
hemicellulose microgels possessed a magnetic response, which provides
possibilities for use in biomedical applications. Magnetic field-induced
transference is very important for drug controlled release, as well
as in clinical diagnosis.[51] These microgels
could hypothetically be loaded with drug and then delivered to specific
locations. The videos related to Figure 4 are
shown in the Supporting Information (Videos
S1, S2, and S3).
Figure 4
Photos of SRHMGs (H40Fe16) in a
magnetic
field: solid powder state (left); 10 mg/mL in water with a magnet
field supplied at the bottom of the vial (middle); 10 mg/mL in water
with a magnet field supplied at left side of the vial (right).
Photos of SRHMGs (H40Fe16) in a
magnetic
field: solid powder state (left); 10 mg/mL in water with a magnet
field supplied at the bottom of the vial (middle); 10 mg/mL in water
with a magnet field supplied at left side of the vial (right).The magnetization of the H40Fe16 microgels
as a function of the magnetic field at 298 K was measured using a
vibrating sample magnetometer , shown in Figure 5a. The magnetization of the H40Fe16 microgels
increased with an increase in the magnetic field, indicating the successful
synthesis of magnetic field-responsive hemicellulose microgels. To
obtain the composition of the H40Fe16 microgels,
the EDS from SEM was measured and is shown in Figure 5b. There was only C, O, and Fe in the composite microgels,
whereas the microgels without Fe (H40) only showed C and
O (Figure 5c). The content
of Fe in the H40Fe16 microgels was 6.8 (% w/w).Magnetic
hysteresis of H40Fe16 (a), EDS spectrum
of H40Fe16 (b), and EDS spectrum of H40 (c) microgels.
Microgel
Mechanical Properties
Mechanical
properties are often essential for microgels. In the pharmaceutical
field, compact tablets prepared from compressed microparticles should
have sufficient mechanical strength to withstand the various handling
operations in the storage logistic chain to the patient.[52] In the tissue engineering field, some critical
factors such as biocompatibility and a load bearing ability cannot
be neglected when repairing damaged tissues. During tissue regeneration,
the living cells can sense or detect the presence the mechanical properties
in their surrounding environment and then convert these mechanical
responses to chemical responses.[53] Quantitative
nanomechanical mapping (QNM) was used to measure the stiffness of
the cross-linked microgels, quantified as the effective Young’s
modulus of the microgels and determined by fitting the measured tip–surface
contact force to the Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov model.[40,54,55] The adhesive forces between the
substrate and the tip determine the Young’s moduli. Compared
with the mechanical properties of the H40 microgels (Figure 6a), the addition of AP and Fe into the hemicellulose
matrix seemed to provide a narrow range distribution of the Young’s
moduli (Figure 6b,d). The high molar mass PAA
varied the force between the substrate and the silicon-based tip (Figure 6c,e). When indenting soft polymers such as PAA,
plastic deformation might occur, which means that the loading–unloading
forces on the substrate surface do not overlap. The exerted force
of the substrate surface varied from one position to another due to
plastic deformation. An uneven mapping or a broader range distribution
of the Young’s moduli could be observed because they were determined
by the interacting forces between the tip and the substrate surface.
In contrast with the tip-PAA interaction, the introduction of small
additives, namely, Fe and AP, might result in overlapping approach–withdrawal
forces, leading to elastic deformation on the surface of the microgels.
In other words, low molar mass additives such as Fe and AP gave rise
to elastic deformation. From the mechanical mapping distribution,
the cross-linked hemicellulose microgels demonstrated promising potential
for use in a broad range of applications that demand strong mechanical
properties on the surface. Different functional groups added to the
hemicellulose microgels influenced the surface roughness. A segmental
distribution of conformational chains, that is, loops, trains, or
tails of the soft polymer (PAA), might affect the topography of the
hemicellulose-based microgels, leading to an increase in the surface
roughness. When AP was mixed with PAA, a flattened conformation might
form during the microgel fabrication; therefore, a decrease in surface
roughness was observed. A uniform distribution of Fe nanoparticles
on the surface of the microgels slightly increased the surface roughness
of the hemicellulose microgels (Figure 6f).
Figure 6
Young’s
moduli of the SRHMGs measured using QNM: H40 (a), H40AP16 (b), H40PAA8 (c), H40Fe16 (d), and H40AP8PAA4 (e). (f) The surface roughness of these microgels.
Young’s
moduli of the SRHMGs measured using QNM: H40 (a), H40AP16 (b), H40PAA8 (c), H40Fe16 (d), and H40AP8PAA4 (e). (f) The surface roughness of these microgels.
Microgel
Blood Compatibility
Blood
compatibility testing of the SRHMGs was performed via a systematic
protocol and included measurements of the WBCT, APTT, and TT, as well
as hemolysis testing. The WBCT measurement provides an overview of
all of the intrinsic clotting factors in the absence of tissue factors,
and it plays an important role in blood-compatible materials that
are in direct contact with fresh blood.[56] Whole blood (50 μL) without any anticoagulant was used in
the present test, and the results are shown in Figure 7a. The WBCT of the pure hemicellulose microgels (467 s) was
much higher than that of poly(ether sulfone) (∼88 s), the latter
being a commonly used blood-contacting biomaterial.[51] All of the SRHMGs showed prolonged WBCTs with a maximum
of 553 s.
Figure 7
Blood compatibility measurements for the SRHMGs:
(a) whole blood
clotting time, (b) hemolysis, (c) activated partial thromboplastin
time, and (d) thrombin time. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation for n = 3.
The hemolysis test is to determine the solubility
of the RBCs in contact with foreign materials and has been a powerful
in vitro assay to evaluate the hemolysis property of biomaterials.[57] Hemoglobin is subsequently delivered from RBCs
when the foreign material breaks the cells, and the hemolysis of foreign
materials is then measured via the absorbance of visible light (Figure 7b). In general, a hemolysis percentage less than
5% is required for biomaterials to be used as drug release carriers
or implanted devices. Both the pure hemicellulose microgels and SRHMGs
had hemolysis percentages less than 3%, indicating that the hemicellulose
has good blood compatibility, and the hemolysis effect of these SRHMGs
is thus greatly suppressed.The blood compatibility of the SRHMGs
should be measured in depth
(lower than cell level) to address the complicated microenvironment
of the blood. Thus, APTT and TT were performed to address this need.
The APTT test is a global screening procedure to evaluate coagulation
abnormalities in the intrinsic pathway and the common plasma coagulation
pathways including Factors II, V, X, or fibrinogen.[56,58] The TT test evaluates the clot formation time for thrombin to convert
fibrinogen into fibrin in PPP.[41] The APTT
(Figure 7c) and TT (Figure 7d) tests of the SRHMGs were performed in a 10 μg/mL
solution. Both the pure hemicellulose microgels and SRHMGs showed
APTT or TT values comparative with the control reference (plasma in
this case). The H40PAA8 microgels had a clearly
increased APTT (to 58 s) compared with the plasma, which was due to
the presence of carboxyl groups on PAA. The TT of the H40PAA8 microgels exhibited the same behavior with a value
of 30 s. The prolonged APTT for the surface-immobilized carboxyl groups
has no relationship with the deficiency of Factor XII (likely related
to other components in plasma, such as calcium ions).[59] The interactions between carboxyl groups and calcium ions
prevent the formation of thrombin clots, and further led to prolonged
clotting times (APTT and TT). In summary, the SRHMGs had excellent
anticoagulation properties.Blood compatibility measurements for the SRHMGs:
(a) whole blood
clotting time, (b) hemolysis, (c) activated partial thromboplastin
time, and (d) thrombin time. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation for n = 3.In summary, the SRHMGs had a set of responses to changes
in the
environmental stimuli, such as pH, electronic field, and magnetic
field. In addition, the SRHMGs showed good blood compatibility. As
presented in Scheme 2, these microgels could
be applied in controlled drug release, magnetic resonance imaging,
biosensors, electronic devices, and tissue engineering.
Scheme 2
Synthesis
of SRHMGs and Suggested Application Fields of These Microgels
Conclusions
SRHMGs were successfully prepared via a single-step cross-linking
chemistry based on a 3F approach. The cross-linking reaction rapidly
occurred during spray drying, and the functional hemicellulose microgels
were made responsive to different external stimuli such as pH, electroactivity,
magnetic field, and dual-stimuli (pH and electric field). Changes
in the particle morphologies were observed due to the introduction
of different functional groups, as confirmed by SEM. In addition,
a spherical geometry of most of the particles was observed with an
average diameter size in the range of 1–4 μm. Alterations
in the surface chemistry and charge, as confirmed by IR, demonstrated
that the functional materials were incorporated into and/or adsorbed
onto the microparticles to provide stimuli response in different environments.
Different oxidation states of AP were demonstrated using UV spectroscopy
and CV, confirming the successful production of electroactive hemicellulose
microgels (H40AP16 and H40AP8PAA4). The H40PAA8 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels showed reversible
swelling behavior when the pH changed between 2.2 and 7.4 due to the
pH sensitivity of PAA. In addition, the zeta potentials of the H40PAA8 and H40AP8PAA4 microgels at pH 2.2–7.4 were in the range from 2 to −11
mV and from −0.5 to −15 mV, respectively, indicating
their tunable charge properties. H40Fe16 exhibited
a magnetic response in a magnetic field. Quantitative nanomechanical
mapping revealed a broad distribution of Young’s moduli (0–900
MPa) when the silicontip indented PAA and AP/PAA. This result could
be due to plastic deformation of the soft polymer, that is, PAA. Finally,
these SRHMGs had prolonged clotting times and low hemolysis effects
(<3%), which extends their applications to controlled drug release,
magnetic resonance imaging, biosensors, electronic devices, and tissue
engineering.
Authors: Lihong Huang; Jun Hu; Le Lang; Xin Wang; Peibiao Zhang; Xiabin Jing; Xianhong Wang; Xuesi Chen; Peter I Lelkes; Alan G Macdiarmid; Yen Wei Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Damla Keskin; Olga Mergel; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Patrick van Rijn Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 6.988