Pat Zanzonico1, Jorge A Carrasquillo2, Neeta Pandit-Taskar2, Joseph A O'Donoghue3, John L Humm3, Peter Smith-Jones2,4, Shutian Ruan2, Chaitanya Divgi5, Andrew M Scott6, Nancy E Kemeny7, Yuman Fong8,9, Douglas Wong7, David Scheinberg7, Gerd Ritter10, Achem Jungbluth10, Lloyd J Old10, Steven M Larson2. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. zanzonip@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 4. Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 5. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. 10. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The molecular specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against tumor antigens has proven effective for targeted therapy of human cancers, as shown by a growing list of successful antibody-based drug products. We describe a novel, nonlinear compartmental model using PET-derived data to determine the "best-fit" parameters and model-derived quantities for optimizing biodistribution of intravenously injected (124)I-labeled antitumor antibodies. METHODS: As an example of this paradigm, quantitative image and kinetic analyses of anti-A33 humanized mAb (also known as "A33") were performed in 11 colorectal cancer patients. Serial whole-body PET scans of (124)I-labeled A33 and blood samples were acquired and the resulting tissue time-activity data for each patient were fit to a nonlinear compartmental model using the SAAM II computer code. RESULTS: Excellent agreement was observed between fitted and measured parameters of tumor uptake, "off-target" uptake in bowel mucosa, blood clearance, tumor antigen levels, and percent antigen occupancy. CONCLUSION: This approach should be generally applicable to antibody-antigen systems in human tumors for which the masses of antigen-expressing tumor and of normal tissues can be estimated and for which antibody kinetics can be measured with PET. Ultimately, based on each patient's resulting "best-fit" nonlinear model, a patient-specific optimum mAb dose (in micromoles, for example) may be derived.
PURPOSE: The molecular specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against tumor antigens has proven effective for targeted therapy of humancancers, as shown by a growing list of successful antibody-based drug products. We describe a novel, nonlinear compartmental model using PET-derived data to determine the "best-fit" parameters and model-derived quantities for optimizing biodistribution of intravenously injected (124)I-labeled antitumor antibodies. METHODS: As an example of this paradigm, quantitative image and kinetic analyses of anti-A33 humanized mAb (also known as "A33") were performed in 11 colorectal cancerpatients. Serial whole-body PET scans of (124)I-labeled A33 and blood samples were acquired and the resulting tissue time-activity data for each patient were fit to a nonlinear compartmental model using the SAAM II computer code. RESULTS: Excellent agreement was observed between fitted and measured parameters of tumor uptake, "off-target" uptake in bowel mucosa, blood clearance, tumor antigen levels, and percent antigen occupancy. CONCLUSION: This approach should be generally applicable to antibody-antigen systems in humantumors for which the masses of antigen-expressing tumor and of normal tissues can be estimated and for which antibody kinetics can be measured with PET. Ultimately, based on each patient's resulting "best-fit" nonlinear model, a patient-specific optimum mAb dose (in micromoles, for example) may be derived.
Authors: Sydney Welt; Gerd Ritter; Clarence Williams; Leonard S Cohen; Achim Jungbluth; Elizabeth A Richards; Lloyd J Old; Nancy E Kemeny Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J K Heath; S J White; C N Johnstone; B Catimel; R J Simpson; R L Moritz; G F Tu; H Ji; R H Whitehead; L C Groenen; A M Scott; G Ritter; L Cohen; S Welt; L J Old; E C Nice; A W Burgess Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-01-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Geoffrey Chong; Fook Thean Lee; Wendie Hopkins; Niall Tebbutt; Jonathan S Cebon; Angela J Mountain; Bridget Chappell; Anthony Papenfuss; Paul Schleyer; Paul U; Roger Murphy; Veronika Wirth; Fiona E Smyth; Nicole Potasz; Aurora Poon; Ian D Davis; Tim Saunder; Graeme J O'keefe; Antony W Burgess; Eric W Hoffman; Lloyd J Old; Andrew M Scott Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; John L Humm; Pat Zanzonico; Peter M Smith-Jones; Chaitanya R Divgi; Daniel A Pryma; Shutian Ruan; Nancy E Kemeny; Yuman Fong; Douglas Wong; Jaspreet S Jaggi; David A Scheinberg; Mithat Gonen; Katherine S Panageas; Gerd Ritter; Achim A Jungbluth; Lloyd J Old; Steven M Larson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: E C Barendswaard; A M Scott; C R Divgi; C Williams; K Coplan; E Riedel; T J Yao; O A Gansow; R D Finn; S M Larson; L J Old; S Welt Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: David M Goldenberg; Robert M Sharkey; Giovanni Paganelli; Jacques Barbet; Jean-François Chatal Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Margaret E Ackerman; Cecile Chalouni; Michael M Schmidt; Vivek V Raman; Gerd Ritter; Lloyd J Old; Ira Mellman; K Dane Wittrup Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott Journal: AAPS J Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: George Crișan; Nastasia Sanda Moldovean-Cioroianu; Diana-Gabriela Timaru; Gabriel Andrieș; Călin Căinap; Vasile Chiș Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Sarah M Cheal; Hong Xu; Hong-Fen Guo; Sang-Gyu Lee; Blesida Punzalan; Sandhya Chalasani; Edward K Fung; Achim Jungbluth; Pat B Zanzonico; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Joseph O'Donoghue; Peter M Smith-Jones; K Dane Wittrup; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Steven M Larson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Brendan M Ottemann; Austin J Helmink; Wenting Zhang; Insiya Mukadam; Christopher Woldstad; James R Hilaire; Yutong Liu; JoEllyn M McMillan; Benson J Edagwa; R Lee Mosley; Jered C Garrison; Bhavesh D Kevadiya; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Volkan Beylergil; Shutian Ruan; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Steven M Larson; Peter M Smith-Jones; Serge K Lyashchenko; Norihisa Ohishi; Toshihiko Ohtomo; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Edward K Fung; Sarah M Cheal; Shoaib B Fareedy; Blesida Punzalan; Volkan Beylergil; Jawaria Amir; Sandhya Chalasani; Wolfgang A Weber; Daniel E Spratt; Darren R Veach; Neil H Bander; Steven M Larson; Pat B Zanzonico; Joseph R Osborne Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 3.138