| Literature DB >> 26801327 |
Edward K Fung1,2, Sarah M Cheal3,4, Shoaib B Fareedy5, Blesida Punzalan6, Volkan Beylergil7,8, Jawaria Amir9, Sandhya Chalasani10, Wolfgang A Weber11,12, Daniel E Spratt13, Darren R Veach14, Neil H Bander15, Steven M Larson16,17,18, Pat B Zanzonico19,20, Joseph R Osborne21,22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We applied a non-linear immunokinetic model to quantitatively compare absolute antibody uptake and turnover in subcutaneous LNCaP human prostate cancer (PCa) xenografts of two radiolabeled forms of the humanized anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) monoclonal antibody J591 ((124)I-J591 and (89)Zr-J591). Using the model, we examined the impact of dose on the tumor and plasma positron emission tomography (PET)-derived time-activity curves. We also sought to predict the optimal targeting index (ratio of integrated-tumor-to-integrated-plasma activity concentrations) for radioimmunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: ImmunoPET; Iodine-124; J591; Non-linear kinetic model; PSMA; Zirconium-89
Year: 2016 PMID: 26801327 PMCID: PMC4723373 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0164-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the non-linear compartmental model developed to represent saturable antibody kinetics. General notation: k(a,b) indicates flow to compartment a from compartment b
Fig. 2Representative serial PET images at 24, 48, and 96 h p.i. of mice bearing s.c. LNCaP tumors imaged with either 89Zr-J591 (a) or 124I-J591 (b). The tumor is indicated in all of the transverse and coronal images by a white arrow. The thyroid is indicated by the red arrow in the coronal 124I-J591 images only. Time-activity curves for tumor and blood corresponding to the images in a and b of 89Zr- (c) and 124I-J591 (d) imaged mice
Fig. 3Representative data for 60-μg dose of 89Zr-J591 (top) and 180-μg dose of 124I-J591 (bottom). Model-fitted TACs shown over measured experimental data
Fig. 4Comparison of efflux rates for 124I- and 89Zr-labeled antibody (shown as average ± standard error of the mean; n = 7 and n = 5, respectively). There is an approximately ninefold difference in rates for the two radiolabeled forms
Fig. 5Targeting index defined as ratio of integral of activity at tumor to integral of activity in plasma as a function of dose. Projected targeting indices based on low-dose parameter estimates are shown for both our non-linear Ag-Ab binding model and for a conventional linear model
Fig. 6Simulated rate of surface binding and internalization for 180-μg Ab doses of 124I- and 89Zr-J591. Surface binding decreases with time, but activity detected at tumor remains high due to internalized Ab-Ag. Differences in total observed tumor activity can be explained primarily by differences in the internalized portion of injected dose while surface binding curves remain nearly identical across radiolabels