Literature DB >> 26194264

Fluorocholangiography: reincarnation in the laparoscopic era-evaluation of intra-operative cholangiography in 3635 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Ahmad H M Nassar1, Ahmad Mirza2, Haitham Qandeel2, Zubir Ahmed2, Samer Zino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) resulted in the decline of routine intra-operative cholangiography (IOC). Common bile duct stones are being diagnosed preoperatively using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). We aim to evaluate the use and benefits of IOC during laparoscopic biliary surgery at a high-volume biliary surgery unit.
METHODS: Prospective data from 4088 patients undergoing LC over 22 years were analysed. Referral protocols allow one firm to receive the great majority of biliary emergencies and all suspected ductal stones. All patients with gall stones on ultrasound scanning, fit for surgery, will undergo LC during the index admission. MRCP and ERCP are not part of preoperative investigation. A four-port LC is performed with a size 5Fr ureteric catheter within an open cannula to obtain an IOC through right sub-costal port.
RESULTS: Of 4088 patients, IOC was attempted in 3691 (90.2 %) and 3635 had a successful IOC (98.4 %). 75 % were females. The mean age was 59 years. Patients presented with one or more of the following: chronic biliary pain in 60 %, acute pain 26.7 %, acute cholecystitis 8.4 %, gallstone pancreatitis 7.8 % and jaundice with or without cholangitis in 19.2 %. A total of 1328 patients (36.5 %) had risk factors for CBD stones. The IOC was abnormal in 975 cases (26.8 %), recording 1599 abnormalities. IOC identified 774 patients with CBD stones (21.3 %), including previously unsuspected CBD stones in 4.7 %. IOC was false negative in 20 cases (0.5 %) found to have stones on basket exploration. A decision not to perform IOC in 453 cases (11 %) was made preoperatively in 74.2 % and intra-operatively in 12.3 %.
CONCLUSION: IOC can be safely and routinely performed in LC. It helps to identify CBD stones, even in patients with no known risk factors, delineate bile duct anatomy and facilitate single-stage management of CBD stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct exploration; Common bile duct stones; Intra-operative cholangiography; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26194264     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4449-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  [Operative cholangiography].

Authors:  P L MIRIZZI
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig Nutr       Date:  1950 May-Jun

Review 2.  Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Ford; M Soop; J Du; B P T Loveday; M Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jordan A G Miller; Brian Coan; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Faisal Hanif; Zubir Ahmed; M Abdel Samie; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Optimising laparoscopic cholangiography time using a simple cannulation technique.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Gamal El Shallaly; Ahmed H Hamouda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

8.  Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O A Khan; S Balaji; G Branagan; D H Bennett; N Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Management of complicated gallstones: results of an alternative approach to difficult cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Marco Maria Lirici; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.442

10.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jisheng Zhu; Shuju Tu; Zhengjiang Yang; Xiaowei Fu; Yong Li; Weidong Xiao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Utilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ewen A Griffiths; James Hodson; Ravi S Vohra; Paul Marriott; Tarek Katbeh; Samer Zino; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of the use of intraoperative cholangiography; time to revisit our approach to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Eoin Donnellan; Jonathan Coulter; Cherian Mathew; Michelle Choynowski; Louise Flanagan; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-08-15

4.  Operative Difficulty, Morbidity and Mortality Are Unrelated to Obesity in Elective or Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Khurram S Khan; Hwei J Ng; Mahmoud Sallam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Hartmann's Pouch Stones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: The Challenges and the Solutions.

Authors:  Khurram Shahzad Khan; Mohammed Ahmed Sajid; Ross Keir McMahon; Sajid Mahmud; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.