Literature DB >> 18392894

Optimising laparoscopic cholangiography time using a simple cannulation technique.

Ahmad H M Nassar1, Gamal El Shallaly, Ahmed H Hamouda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opponents of the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) express concern over its technical difficulty and the length of time it takes. AIM: To evaluate the impact of our cystic duct cannulation (CDC) technique, as implemented by one consultant and his trainees, on the IOC time.
METHODS: IOC is done routinely in all the laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) undertaken in our unit. We carried out a prospective audit over a period of 18 months, recording the IOC time in consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholangiography (LC) with and without laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). The total IOC time was considered to consist of two components: cystic duct cannulation (CDC) time and fluoroscopy time. The IOC time was further analysed according to the difficulty of cannulation and the operator experience. Special consideration was given to the LCBDE cases. We also describe the detailed steps of our CDC technique.
RESULTS: Over a period of 18 months 243 patients underwent LC. IOC was completed in 240 patients (98.8% success rate). Of those, 194 were females (81%). The mean age was 50 years (range 18-85 years). The mean total IOC time was 6 min, with a CDC time of 2 min, and fluoroscopy time of 4 min. On further analysis, CDC was considered easy in 86% of cases with a mean CDC time of 1.5 min and total IOC time of 4.3 min. When cannulation was difficult (14% of cases) a cholangiography clamp had to be used to prevent leakage of contrast. In difficult cases, the CDC and IOC mean times were 5 and 8.5 min, respectively. As would be expected, trainees spent more time performing cannulation and completing the IOC than the specialist surgeon (3.8 versus 1.8 min, and 7.2 versus 5.6 min, respectively). These differences were statistically but not clinically significant. Similarly, the IOC time was also significantly increased in LCBDE (13 min). This was mainly due to an increase in fluoroscopy time (10 min) rather than CDC time (3 min).
CONCLUSION: The IOC time could be optimised by using a simple and learnable cannulation technique to less than 5 min in most LCs. Surgeons should not, therefore, refrain from using this important investigation on selective or routine basis, subject to their policy for dealing with patients with suspected bile duct stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392894     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9853-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K Ludwig; J Bernhardt; H Steffen; D Lorenz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; Christopher Flowers; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Intraoperative cholangiography time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing the radiographer.

Authors:  G El Shallaly; C Seow; C Sharp; A Mughrabi; A H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 734 consecutive cases.

Authors:  L T Ladocsi; L D Benitez; D R Filippone; F C Nance
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Results of a change to routine fluorocholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D B Jones; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs selective policy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Shimi; S Banting; L K Nathanson; A Pietrabissa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Vezakis; D Davides; B J Ammori; I G Martin; M Larvin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Evaluation of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  G Ledniczky; N Fiore; G Bognár; P Ondrejka; J L Grosfeld
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2006 May-Jun

10.  Cost-effective laparoscopic cholangiography.

Authors:  J A Caprini
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1994-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Basket-in-catheter access for transcystic laparoscopic bile duct exploration: technique and results.

Authors:  Haitham Qandeel; Samer Zino; Zulfiqar Hanif; M Kazem Nassar; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Mostafa A Hamad; Ahmad A Nada; Mohamad Y Abdel-Atty; Ahmad S Kawashti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Fluorocholangiography: reincarnation in the laparoscopic era-evaluation of intra-operative cholangiography in 3635 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Ahmad Mirza; Haitham Qandeel; Zubir Ahmed; Samer Zino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Training Opportunities in an Emergency Biliary Service.

Authors:  Salman A A Jabbar; Zubir Ahmed; Ahmad Mirza; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Operative Difficulty, Morbidity and Mortality Are Unrelated to Obesity in Elective or Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Khurram S Khan; Hwei J Ng; Mahmoud Sallam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Optimising the outcomes of index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration for biliary emergencies: a service model.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Hwei J Ng; Zubir Ahmed; Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki; Colin Wood; Ayman Abdellatif
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Hartmann's Pouch Stones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: The Challenges and the Solutions.

Authors:  Khurram Shahzad Khan; Mohammed Ahmed Sajid; Ross Keir McMahon; Sajid Mahmud; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Open conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration: subspecialisation safely reduces the conversion rates.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Hisham El Zanati; Hwei J Ng; Khurram S Khan; Colin Wood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Reinterventions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration. A review of prospective data from 5740 patients.

Authors:  Hwei Jene Ng; Ahmad H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.