S Mehta1,2,3, A McIntyre1,2,3, S Guy1,2,3, R W Teasell1,2,3, E Loh1,2,3. 1. Aging, Rehabilitation, and Geriatric Care, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on reducing neuropathic pain intensity in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases were searched for all relevant articles published from 1980 to November 2014. Trials were included if (i) tDCS intervention group and a placebo control group were present; (ii) at least 50% of participants in the study had an SCI and there were at least three participants; (iii) participants were aged 18 years or older; and (iv) persistent pain for at least 3 months. Studies were excluded if: (i) the tDCS intervention group was compared with an active treatment group; (ii) there was insufficient reporting detail to enable pooling of data; and (iii) it was a nonclinical trial (that is, reviews, epidemiology, basic sciences). A standardized mean difference (SMD) ± s.e. and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each outcome of interest and the results were pooled using a fixed or random effects model, as appropriate. Effect sizes were interpreted as: small > 0.2, moderate > 0.5, large > 0.8. RESULTS: Five studies met inclusion criteria of which four were randomized controlled trials and one was a prospective controlled trial. The pooled analysis found a significant effect of tDCS on reducing neuropathic pain after SCI post treatment (SMD = 0.510 ± 0.202; 95% CI, 0.114-0.906; P < 0.012); however, this effect was not maintained at follow-up (SMD = 0.353 ± 0.272; 95% CI, -0.179 to 0.886; P < 0.194). A reduction of 1.33 units on a 10-item scale was observed post treatment. No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Meta-analytic results indicate a moderate effect of tDCS in reducing neuropathic pain among individuals with SCI; however, the effect was not maintained at follow-up. A mean pooled decrease of 1.33 units on a 10-item scale was found post treatment. Several factors were implicated in the effectiveness of tDCS in reducing pain. Due to the limited number of studies and lack of follow-up, more evidence is required before treatment recommendations can be made.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on reducing neuropathic pain intensity in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases were searched for all relevant articles published from 1980 to November 2014. Trials were included if (i) tDCS intervention group and a placebo control group were present; (ii) at least 50% of participants in the study had an SCI and there were at least three participants; (iii) participants were aged 18 years or older; and (iv) persistent pain for at least 3 months. Studies were excluded if: (i) the tDCS intervention group was compared with an active treatment group; (ii) there was insufficient reporting detail to enable pooling of data; and (iii) it was a nonclinical trial (that is, reviews, epidemiology, basic sciences). A standardized mean difference (SMD) ± s.e. and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each outcome of interest and the results were pooled using a fixed or random effects model, as appropriate. Effect sizes were interpreted as: small > 0.2, moderate > 0.5, large > 0.8. RESULTS: Five studies met inclusion criteria of which four were randomized controlled trials and one was a prospective controlled trial. The pooled analysis found a significant effect of tDCS on reducing neuropathic pain after SCI post treatment (SMD = 0.510 ± 0.202; 95% CI, 0.114-0.906; P < 0.012); however, this effect was not maintained at follow-up (SMD = 0.353 ± 0.272; 95% CI, -0.179 to 0.886; P < 0.194). A reduction of 1.33 units on a 10-item scale was observed post treatment. No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Meta-analytic results indicate a moderate effect of tDCS in reducing neuropathic pain among individuals with SCI; however, the effect was not maintained at follow-up. A mean pooled decrease of 1.33 units on a 10-item scale was found post treatment. Several factors were implicated in the effectiveness of tDCS in reducing pain. Due to the limited number of studies and lack of follow-up, more evidence is required before treatment recommendations can be made.
Authors: L García-Larrea; R Peyron; P Mertens; M C Gregoire; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; P Convers; F Mauguière; M Sindou; B Laurent Journal: Pain Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Felipe Fregni; Paulo S Boggio; Moises C Lima; Merari J L Ferreira; Tim Wagner; Sergio P Rigonatti; Anita W Castro; Daniel R Souza; Marcelo Riberto; Steven D Freedman; Michael A Nitsche; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Pain Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Paul J Wrigley; Sylvia M Gustin; Leigh N McIndoe; Rosemary J Chakiath; Luke A Henderson; Philip J Siddall Journal: Pain Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Nancy Brandenburg; Daniel B Carr; Charles Cleeland; Raymond Dionne; John T Farrar; Bradley S Galer; David J Hewitt; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; James P Robinson; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; James Witter Journal: Pain Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Eldon Loh; Magdalena Mirkowski; Alexandria Roa Agudelo; David J Allison; Brooke Benton; Thomas N Bryce; Sara Guilcher; Tara Jeji; Anna Kras-Dupuis; Denise Kreutzwiser; Oda Lanizi; Gary Lee-Tai-Fuy; James W Middleton; Dwight E Moulin; Colleen O'Connell; Steve Orenczuk; Patrick Potter; Christine Short; Robert Teasell; Andrea Townson; Eva Widerström-Noga; Dalton L Wolfe; Nancy Xia; Swati Mehta Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Ana Sánchez-Kuhn; Cristian Pérez-Fernández; Rosa Cánovas; Pilar Flores; Fernando Sánchez-Santed Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Wei-Ju Chang; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges; Rana S Hinman; Carolyn L Young; Valentina Buscemi; Matthew B Liston; Siobhan M Schabrun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240